Current location - Quotes Website - Excellent quotations - Useful aphorisms write argumentative essays on the subject.
Useful aphorisms write argumentative essays on the subject.
Reading breaks thousands of volumes, and writing is like a god; Books are the ladder of human progress. These two sentences are useful aphorisms.

Title: Opening books is beneficial.

In this information-based world, reading is one of the only ways for us to acquire knowledge. Reading more books can broaden our knowledge and enrich our literary accomplishment, which is of great help to our future speaking and writing. ?

The second paragraph: Our knowledge is like a reservoir. A lot of reading enables our reservoir to store a lot of knowledge. While we supplement our knowledge, our knowledge is constantly leaking out. At this time, if we stop reading or read less, the water in the reservoir will soon run out. Only by constantly enriching extracurricular reading can we enrich our knowledge without losing a lot. A lot of knowledge can provide enough material for your composition, otherwise you will only write some meaningless repetitive words if you hold it for a long time. ?

The third paragraph: It is beneficial to open books because Song Taizu said, "As long as you study, it will always be beneficial." . Since then, it has become an idiom to open books.

The fourth paragraph: You may ask, why do you want to talk about this? The reason is very simple, and the key lies in the word "total". This means that there will always be benefits, not just benefits. Therefore, it is necessary to demonstrate that reading is beneficial rather than harmless.

The fifth paragraph: First of all, it is good for good books, which everyone understands, so it is necessary to demonstrate whether the so-called bad books have some advantages. As far as the benefits of reading are concerned, it is big enough to make people fully realize, repent, move towards the bright road and succeed; Small enough to learn several kinds of writing, a few words and even know a few words. These are the benefits of reading, which is undeniable. So you can introduce a few points to demonstrate that bad books also have some benefits:

The first analysis: as long as it is called a bad book, it will definitely affect people's character and lead people astray. But please think about it, what if those bad books can't produce a certain * * * sound with readers and can't let people go deep into them? If the structural layout, expression, conception and language of this book are unremarkable, even worse than the general "running account" composition, how can it resonate with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad the book is, at least you can learn some writing methods in the so-called bad book, and at worst you can know a few words. Can you say it's useless?

The second analysis: whether a book is bad or good is judged according to whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. In other words, bad books also have certain benefits.

The third analysis: Laozi in ancient China had a view that everything has two sides. Since bad books are harmful, they must have their advantages.

The fourth analysis: Maybe you want to say: "Suppose there is a bad book, the content is unsightly, the layout of the article is completely wrong, and the whole article is full of wrong sentences and words ..." Until you can't find an advantage. But have you ever thought, even if there is such a book, can anyone read it? Will you go and see it? Since I won't read it, even the premise of "opening the book" is gone. How to talk about whether opening books is beneficial or harmful?

The fifth analysis: Although you can cite a bunch of examples of reading depravity, madness and crime, what can this show? It only shows that the reader's own mentality is wrong. It's a matter of mentality, and you can't blame it on books. Can anyone blame a knife for killing people with a knife?

Conclusion: Therefore, as long as you study, no matter how big or small, it will be beneficial. Therefore, it can be inferred that "opening books is beneficial" will certainly be established.

Conclusion: As for "opening books is not necessarily beneficial", it is a neutral word, half of which is right, but the other half is useless, so there is a problem: useless, not harmful. Just like a car on the road, it won't fly into the blue sky like an airplane. Can you say it's a drill? If the argument is "open book is harmful", then according to some arguments just now, it can naturally be established, but it is wrong to say "useless".