1.(65438+ It can be seen that being a man is not a simple task that can be completed in a day or two! If everyone insists on "being a man first, then doing things" and dares to ask each other's friends, when can they start doing things?
(2) Can an inexperienced young employee simply stop working because he is not a good person? Anyway, they can say that they are still in the stage before doing things! Many contemporary neets really want to thank the other debaters for helping them find a just statement!
2.( 1) Ask your opponent to clearly point out the evaluation criteria for being a human being. If you are honest, you can ask the specific evaluation criteria of honesty. Obviously, we don't have a clear examination or institution to evaluate our living standards, so we can't judge whether others are qualified subjectively. If you follow the opponent's saying that "be a man before doing things", how can you be sure that this person is qualified and can start doing things?
(2) If a person can't know exactly whether he was a good person before doing something, what's the difference between the idea that the other person can never achieve it and Arabian Nights?
If your parents accuse you of focusing on doing things instead of being a man, you can say that "first" and "second" were explicitly mentioned in the debate. We have never denied the importance of being a man, but in a different order, because being a man is a macro concept composed of countless basic traces of doing things.