Darwin once called his theory "the devil's Bible"

This paper focuses on the comparison between anatomy and the destruction of legal evidence of embryonic development and reproduction.

The era when the theory of evolution was put forward coincided with the era when western society would actively expand by force to seek overseas markets, and material strength began to replace morality as the goal pursued by people. At the same time, after the Middle Ages, Zongxi's religion began to decline, and people gradually lost confidence in ancient beliefs. Either to survive or to enjoy, the unprecedented brutal competition of human beings has become the reality of social clubs. The idea of survival of the fittest undoubtedly catered to the social mentality at that time. Darwin once called his theory "the devil's Bible". Although this is aimed at fundamentalism, judging from the evolutionary history of 100 years, this name is really appropriate.

When Darwin published the Origin of Species, he questioned his theory, which can be seen from an example. In the first edition of the Origin of Species, Darwin used a bold idea that bears can go into the water and become aquatic animals, and finally become huge creatures like whales. So he said, as long as there is enough time, through natural selection, bears can also become whales. In later revisions, Darwin deleted this statement. But interestingly, his idea that this bear can become a whale through natural selection is the center of the whole theory of evolution: one species can become another.

Strictly speaking, evolution is just a hypothesis to explain biological phenomena. As can be seen from the above example of whale evolution, Darwin mixed his own very bold guess when summing up the existing examples and forming his own hypothesis. Darwin himself only hoped to find more and more conclusive evidence in the future.

However, some later scholars, out of their love for this hypothesis and their eager desire to put it on the theoretical level, spread it as a theory intentionally or unintentionally. Some "scientists" are in a hurry, trying their best to make material evidence, draw pictures and write articles to "prove" the authenticity and accuracy of evolution. With the spread of emotion and idealization more and more widely, people in the future will gradually take hypothesis as truth. As more and more people believe in evolution, those who don't believe will gradually get no chance to speak, and many people will drift with the tide and become the tail of evolution. This is especially true in China, the former Soviet Union and the former Eastern Europe.

For many years, it is difficult for outsiders to get involved in the study of evolution. The complex life structure and numerous technical terms make the study of life evolution a "patent" for evolutionists. In other words, evolutionists are thinking for the public and even deciding the truth for scientists in other fields.

We know that one of the methods of scientific research is to simplify complex problems and explain complex phenomena clearly in concise language. Here, on the basis of some recent breakthroughs in related fields, we will put forward the fatal problems of evolution from several aspects, leaving the opportunity for rational thinking to every listener.

The theory of evolution is based on three main aspects: comparative anatomy, paleontology, embryonic development and the recurrence law of education. But the research in recent years has made them collapse one by one. Today we will examine the theory of evolution from the perspective of comparative anatomy and the law of embryo development and reproduction.

First of all, let's analyze the fatal point of comparative anatomy-the misuse of inverse propositions.

If the proof of a scientific hypothesis contains any logical errors, the hypothesis cannot be promoted to theory by this proof. Using comparative anatomy to prove the theory of evolution, figuratively speaking, is: "if people evolved from apes, people and apes will have many similar characteristics;" Because humans and apes have many similar characteristics, humans evolved from apes. "This is, of course, the simplest and most naive logical error. We can make some analogies with things in real life, and you can see the problem:

For example, "If A is B's younger brother, A is smaller than B; Because A is smaller than B, A is B's brother. " Of these two sentences, the first one is right and the second one is wrong. Otherwise, all men in the world are brothers of the oldest people, and this generation will be in chaos, and irrelevant people will become a family.

For another example, "if a person can ride a horse, he will drive a car;" If a man can drive, he can ride a horse. "These two sentences are wrong, because there is no necessary logical connection between' riding' and' driving'.

However, there are also cases, such as "if a number is divisible by 2, it is an even number;" Because a number is even, it is divisible by 2. "These two propositions are all right; Because "divisible by two" is the definition of "even number", the proposition conditional on definition is reversible.

Now back to the proposition about evolution. "If people evolved from apes, people and apes will have many similar characteristics", which was originally the starting point of inductive evolution hypothesis, but it could not be proved at all. The only way to make the second sentence right is to directly define "golden flower" as "there are many similarities", but in this way, not only the monkey is your ancestor, but all the men, women and children in the street are your ancestors! Because anyone has more similarities with you than monkeys do with you. From this point of view, only the Devil's Bible can really make mankind become such a "pot of porridge".

Next, let's look at the denied laws of embryo development and reproduction.

1866, haeckel, a German, put forward the law of embryo development and reproduction, or the law of biological inheritance, and thought that the embryo development and reproduction of higher organisms would reproduce the evolutionary process of this species. In the era when evolution just laid the foundation, the law of repetition immediately became one of the most favorable "evidences" of evolution. With the development of biology, in the process of continuous development and extension, recursion law gradually exposes many problems, especially in recent years, which makes it fall into an unavoidable crisis in theory. Moreover, in-depth research and analysis show that the recursive law is only the result of rough observation and loses the support of facts.

Now, many scholars have proved that the law of repetition is an observation error. Blech Schmidt, a German human embryologist, wrote the book The Beginning of Human Life, which proved with detailed data that the human fetus was a human structure from the beginning. For example, it used to be thought that the fish-like "branchial fissure" of the early fetus was actually a wrinkle on the fetal face, which was completely the structure of the human face and was called "branchial fissure". The fetus is about 9 mm, and the lower end of the body protrudes like a tail. In fact, it doesn't have any structural features of the tail. It is a hollow sacred canal, which develops rapidly, grows in the direction of low resistance, temporarily protrudes to the end, and soon calms down. And it's not a residual organ at all.

For rare deformities: hairy children and children with long tails, evolution interprets them as the characteristics of human ancestors; According to this logic, if there is no brain, there will be more deformities, and then that person's ancestors will have no brain? Congenital limb defects and long fingers and toes are also common, so human limbs evolved from various deformities? If we think outside the framework of evolution, we will find that the so-called "atavism" is just a deformity or defect, a reflection of genetic diseases, and it is unreasonable to connect with human ancestors.

Richard Richardson, a British embryologist, organized scientists from 17 units to study the embryos of 50 different vertebrates and their growth process, and carefully observed and recorded them. Anatomy and parallel connection; The Journal of Embryology published their surprising results: "haeckel embryo" is the most famous deception in biology.

According to Richardson's research, there are many doubts about the law of recursion: for example, in order to paint the human embryo like a fish, haeckel dug up most of the internal organs of the human embryo, such as the nose, heart, liver, and germ of hands and feet, and then lengthened the spine into a tail! He also added it at will. For example, during this period, the eyes of chicken embryos are different from those of other animals. It has no pigment, but haeckel painted it black, making it comparable to other animals. Also, haeckel can change the size ratio at will, and his flexibility can reach ten times to increase the similarity of different embryos. Haeckel deliberately chose different animals as representatives, but left out the names of these representatives, making people think that animals of the same class must be the same.

It turns out that when haeckel was still teaching at the University of Jena, the fake drawings he forged had been exposed. Richardson personally went to the University of Jena to investigate this scam that has been concealed for 100 years. It proves that haeckel was accused by his colleagues that year, not only admitting forgery, but also being found guilty. So far, no pictures of haeckel can be found in German textbooks.

As we just talked about, the law of repetition itself is a false assumption without a solid foundation. If my own survival problems are not solved, how can I have extra energy to prove the theory of evolution?