When I was in primary school, I abandoned my original principle because I wanted to integrate into a so-called collective. Like the little boy in Smelly Fish, I bullied my classmates who didn't look normal. The following is my punishment for everyone. I hope you like it.

Punish the feeling after reading 1

Later, Milla returned to the real Red Umbrella base, was tortured by Jill controlled by Starscream (a small machine that controls people), and was rescued by Li Bingbing. Then he had to break through three or four levels to escape from the Red Umbrella. Each level is a dreamland with different enemies. Please refer to the structure of Inception.

On the other side, a five-person team is going to blow up the whole red umbrella. After two hours of explosions, they should meet Milla. Here, Li Bingbing and Milla are breaking through the checkpoint. Here, the team is looking for them and finally meet.

After the Red Umbrella Base was destroyed by a fierce gunfight, there were only two people left in the five-person team. Milla took her daughter in the dreamland and got on a snow shovel. As a result, I met Jill and Michelle Starscream and Li Bingbing who was kidnapped. Then, Li Bingbing was stunned (I was so embarrassed that I had been lying in the snow, and I didn't make any effort during the decisive battle). After several people fought fiercely, there was only one unmanned team left. Milla and Li Bingbing, their daughter and Jill, who became better after being taken down by Starscream, went to the White House, where the last people on earth lived, all of whom were soldiers. Outside the wall of the White House, there are tens of thousands of zombies.

The flashback at the beginning and the scene of Milla fighting zombies in the village are really good! The flashback 3D effect at the beginning is very good! ! Sigh that it is worthwhile to buy tickets. Moreover, students who like zombies, take a good look at the front, because there are really no zombies next. . . . . Mulberry heart

later, as soon as he returned to the Red Umbrella Base, the whole thing immediately went low, and blabla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla. . . After Milla escaped from the Red Umbrella, he began to kill all kinds of zombies. Meet Li Bingbing, and then kill two axe monsters in new york. After the round with the squad, killing the giant Boss is just a variety of gun battles. The ugly boss looks very strong, but it has no destructive power. It doesn't eat people, but hides people in an egg. What a lovely boss. . . Later, fighting in the snow was a real action part, but nothing happened to Li Bingbing! ! Milla and the team fought against Starscream and Michelle, all kinds of fighting martial arts, and Michelle also used a reinforcing agent, which was particularly fierce, and the body recovered automatically, and the bullets could be excluded from the body. Holy shit. But in the end, the goddess Milla took Jill's spider down and killed it. Jill turned back into a good person, and Michelle was eaten by monsters in the water under the ice.

There are some scenes of flying axe and sickle in the middle, and the opening zombie part is also very emotional, but the plot is quite weak, but this is a film that doesn't pursue the plot, just watch it cool. It is said that this zombie is obviously more evolved than the previous ones, running fast, and everyone is equipped with petal tongues (let me call it that).

Punishing the feeling after reading 2

Recently, I read jane nelsen's "classic book that benefits millions of children, parents and teachers for life" and "Positive Discipline", which introduced many effective classical theories involving children's psychology, behavior, cognition and education in a simple way, which benefited me a lot, especially in chapter 7: using encouragement effectively made me understand encouragement more deeply. Without encouragement, they cannot survive. " Yes, children need the encouragement of adults to thrive. So what is encouragement? First of all, we should effectively distinguish between encouragement and praise.

The author also suggested that we give encouragement to children, not praise, which puzzled me at the moment. Is there any difference between the two? So difficult that we shouldn't praise the children? I went on reading with questions, and slowly realized the meaning of the words. The knowledge of encouragement is very deep, and I usually don't make good use of encouragement, but the book expounds it from several aspects, such as timing, mutual respect, focusing on advantages, etc., so that we can understand what is effective encouragement and self-reflection. I have many misunderstandings in this respect, such as: I often use this sentence to praise my children: "You are really a good boy, obedient and sensible, and an example for everyone to learn!" Under this kind of praise, the child will be very happy and bright, and she will feel that "adults recognize me and I am valuable." The author points out that praise points to the person who does things, so that people who do things often do things based on the consideration of "what others will think and see" When he is not recognized by others, he will be at a loss and confused.

This child (who will be an adult when he grows up) may form a self-concept that completely depends on other people's opinions, which may become "flatterer" and "always seeking others' approval". Encouragement refers to people's behavior, which often inspires them to think about "what do I think", "what should I do now" and "what have I learned and felt". It can make people introspect, make people think more and feel that they are valuable, and finally form a self-confident and self-reliant attitude without the approval of others. Children in small classes are young and have poor self-reflection ability, so teachers may use more praise than encouragement here, but with the passage of time and the growth of age, my previous sentence will only make children "change" and lack self-confidence. It is the author who let me know that the same word of praise and encouragement has different effects for different children. We should sincerely and appropriately praise and encourage them according to their age and personality.

This book has given me a lot of inspiration, which makes me learn more correct and positive ways to discipline my children in my post-menstrual work, so that children can grow up happily and healthily in a self-confident and self-reliant environment.

Punishing the feeling after reading 3

When I watched Positive Discipline, I couldn't help but think of the first class of students I took with me in my first year of work. At that time, I just came out of school and entered the school, and my status was changing. Although I had studied management knowledge at school before, participated in on-the-job training and listened to the experience of many experts and predecessors, I was still very uneasy. Although raw, but very enterprising to learn.

I remember that during the freshman training, as the head teacher, I asked each student to prepare a self-introduction in advance, with unlimited content, and invited the student "photographer" to record the moment and words of each student at the beginning of junior high school. When everyone graduated three years later, and when everyone got together five years and ten years after graduation, I would like to show you that young and full of vitality. Looking back, what kind of mood did you feel? Do you have regrets? Will you regret it?

I remember that I attended the class meeting once a week, especially the first class meeting-the formulation of the class convention. In fact, it's not an open democracy. I'll draw up a few yes and no, just ask the students to agree or not, so that everyone can reach a consensus. Although it is like going through the motions, the attitude is sincere in seeking students' opinions, and every classmate will feel involved in class management, which is in line with some theories mentioned in this book. In the regular class meeting, I will ask my classmates to comment on the events of the class in a week at will, and let the students take out the good and bad things to bask in the sun, so that they can have a sense of self-discipline, but they still don't comment. I still can't help but comment on every thing I say, because the purpose is too clear, that is, I will continue to do the good things and criticize and stop the bad things.

I remember that in those days, I enjoyed talking with students, learning, classmates and parents, and keeping abreast of students' ideological trends at any time. When I found something wrong, I would take the initiative to contact my parents by phone, sometimes a phone call lasted more than half an hour.

Later, I don't know when the class meeting class became shorter and shorter. Instead of asking students to organize the class meeting class, I will summarize the statement and mainly point out the bad things in the class. More time is spent in math class and practice.

I'm getting angry more and more easily. When I get angry, the whole class starts cursing, and it's even angrier to watch them all bow their heads and say nothing. In this book, I compare my own leadership style, and I think that my essence belongs to the eagle leadership style-I like the feeling that everything is under my control. Sometimes it will be super organized, and sometimes it will be super sloppy-I used to call this kind of personality emotional and put things off with the best wishes. I like to do things by myself, and it will make me feel uneasy to assign things. What if I can't do it well and can't achieve the results? I imagine myself as a "superman", and then where there is a real superman, I often feel very stressed, everything is beyond my control, sometimes I am particularly silent and retreat into my protective shell, and sometimes I attack others sharply and violently, turning into a screaming and attacking beast. Perhaps it is this impermanence that makes students unable to understand the teacher's situation, and they are not sure when they will step on the thunder. Slowly, the relationship becomes alienated.

Reflections on Punishment 4

When I saw the name Punishment, I felt that the child must have done something wrong. The adult was punishing him, but after reading the story, it gave me an unexpected result.

The story goes like this: Mr. Smith has five children, all of whom are very naughty. When something happens, they have to ask to the end. One day, as soon as Mr. Smith got home, his wife came forward to complain. It turned out that a child took down the alarm clock in order to know why the hands of the alarm clock moved, but did not go away. A child broke the glass by testing Galileo's law with a glass, a child cut the grass with a lawn mower but cut it into a big face, and a child fed sleeping pills to the dog to observe whether sleeping pills were effective for the dog. Only one child hasn't made a mistake all day. But unexpectedly, Mr. Smith didn't criticize the four children who made mistakes, but just wanted to punish the children who didn't make any mistakes. Why is this? It turned out that Mr. Smith didn't punish the mistake, because the child didn't do anything to avoid making mistakes, but he made an unforgivable mistake, which was a waste of time.

right and wrong depend on the criteria of judgment. In this article, it can be said that all four children did something "wrong" because they destroyed things at home, such as the broken alarm clock, the broken glass, the dog being drugged and the lawn being cut. However, the wise parent did not criticize them for the bad results they made, but affirmed their motivation and process, because they spent time and energy on research to explore what they didn't know, and they did meaningful things. On the contrary, the child who didn't make a mistake didn't do anything all day and wasted his time.

This story tells us that we must cherish time and do meaningful things. If you have nothing to do and waste time in order to avoid making mistakes, it will be a more serious mistake.

In our real life, many adults like obedient children, because they don't make mistakes and don't make people worry. They do whatever adults want, as if there is no chance to make mistakes at all. But in fact, in order to be called "good boy" and "good student" by others, such children try to do less things against the wishes of adults to ensure fewer mistakes. However, this qiaqia has made these children less creative, less exploration and practice, and less opportunities to do things better. This will be an unforgivable mistake. "An inch of time is worth an inch of gold, but an inch of gold can't buy an inch of time." If we spend every day exploring and learning and doing something meaningful every day, then we will live a meaningful life. Just as a famous saying in How Steel is Tempered: The most precious thing for people is life, and life belongs to people only once. A person's life should be spent like this: when he looks back on the past, he will not regret wasting his time, nor will he be ashamed of doing nothing. In this way, when he died, he could say: My whole life and all my energy have been dedicated to the greatest cause in the world.

Reflections on Punishment 5

The last book of Law Book Month is Punishment. Unlike the first two books (Crime and Guilt), the author Schirach gave up writing a case from the first perspective as a lawyer and told a story in the third person. Obviously, it is a pile of cases, but what I read is a story full of humanity. Human nature is not only bright, but also greedy, angry and stupid, helpless and sad on the bright back. And this helplessness is so sad that you can't bear to criticize and punish them.

The older you get, the more you find that it is really difficult to evaluate a person's quality. There are tens of millions of people in the world, and human nature is also complex and diverse. There is no reason for us to label a person just by virtue of a simple "good" or "bad". In the vast universe, people are so small and fragile, and people's spirit is so vulnerable. You don't know when, at a moment, at a point, this person's psychology will collapse. It may be that this person was doomed before he was born, or it may be caused by the acquired living environment. We don't know. Psychologists have no way to answer, and philosophers have no answer. Perhaps, it is precisely because of this that different lives have been created.

My heart pities the situation of the protagonists in each story, but I also know rationally that crime is a crime. I'm sighing that I can escape justice in this way? On the one hand, I have a certain understanding of the protagonist of the story. For example, in the story Neighbor, I try to understand the loneliness of the man and the selfish feelings he wants to possess. I may only understand him emotionally, but his behavior still scares me.

In The Bright Blue Sky, I interpreted the lynching revenge of the last woman as a kind of self-reproach, remorse and even hatred for a dead heart. I sympathize with her emotionally. Because in a small corner of my heart, I think she has suffered a lot, and I hope she will not go to jail again. I am so, as a legal illiterate who is not firm in his position, swinging between reason and sensibility.

Everyone has a few unknown hobbies to some extent, but as long as they don't cross the line, make principled mistakes or constitute a crime, there is no need for others to blame them. For example, in the story of Lydia, there is nothing wrong with a fetish man as long as he doesn't interfere with others. However, it is a very inhuman behavior for his neighbors to destroy the doll of the man just because they don't like his behavior. You can't understand how fragile a person's psychology is, and how much spiritual sustenance an item carries may be the whole motivation to support a person's survival. If he doesn't cross the line, just because he is different from ordinary people, to deny the meaning of this item is equivalent to destroying all the beliefs of a fragile person. Like the man in "The Diver", he was shocked after seeing the delivery, and then suddenly had a hobby. His hobby didn't die, but he did