1, so the scholar has a picture as a prison and can't enter; Cutting wood is an official, and it is up to the fresh to discuss its wrongness.
2, people are inherently mortal, and death is heavier than Mount Tai or lighter than a feather, which is also different.
3. In the dust. Ancient and modern integration, do not disgrace the mission.
4, people are inherently mortal, and death is heavier than Mount Tai or lighter than a feather.
5. From this perspective, it is courage and potential; Through this incident, we know that it is time to be bold and afraid.
6. I also want to learn from the changes of ancient and modern times and get married.
7. On the occasion of the study of heaven and man, the change of ancient and modern times has become a family statement.
8. The article "Ji Jia will cut" accuses others of shirking their responsibilities.
Overall appreciation
In the first paragraph, from the beginning to "Don't be too lucky", explain the contents of Ren An's letter first, and then apologize for the late reply. "Pushing a sage to be a scholar" is a euphemism for Ren An to ask the author to "intercede", and "dare not do so" is the core of this paragraph, which comes from Chen Jizhi.
The second paragraph, from "I heard" to "What are you talking about?" It shows that I am no longer a scholar because I am in prison, so it is difficult to participate in the preliminary discussion. Ren An saw Sima Qian's "respect", and he was inseparable from Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty. He thought he was very successful, so he asked Sima Qian to "promote the wise men." He didn't know that Sima Qian was as miserable as usual.
Ren An's words touched a sore spot. He first explained that he did not have the conditions to recommend sages and scholars, and then explained that he accepted castration, violated the code of conduct for gentlemen, despised himself as a gentleman, and did not have the identity to recommend sages and scholars. Finally, I explained that I was mediocre and incompetent before being punished, and I didn't get the attention of the emperor, nor did I have the capital to recommend sages and scholars.
In the third paragraph, from "things at the end of the story are not easy to understand" to "things of laity are not easy to understand", the reason why Chen Ming was imprisoned seems to be Li Ling's name, but in a broad sense, he is also a scholar. Sima Qian defended Li Ling. Many people thought he was wrong at that time. So he defended himself in the letter. He said that he "pushed the story" in front of Emperor Wu, in order to "broaden the meaning of the Lord", that is, to comfort Emperor Wu.
Besides, he has no personal relationship with Li Ling. He only admired Li Ling's outstanding TEDA performance and determination to go to the public enemy before going to war, and thought that although Li Ling lost his teacher, he did not humiliate the country according to his situation of beating the public with less, his desperate performance and his record of killing a large number of enemies. He thinks it is a misunderstanding that Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty said that he "lobbied for Li Ling". This part embodies Sima Qian's view of right and wrong.