Current location - Quotes Website - Excellent quotations - Zhuangzi's Homogeneity Theory (4)
Zhuangzi's Homogeneity Theory (4)
Using referential metaphor to refer to non-reference, and not referring to non-reference with non-reference metaphor; A horse is not a horse, a horse is not a horse. Everything is a horse at the point of heaven and earth.

It's okay. It's okay. When the Tao is done, it will naturally become. Evil? However, naturally. Is it evil or not? Otherwise, it is not. Things are human beings, things are human beings. If there is nothing, there is nothing. Therefore, it is an example of success and failure, an example of success and failure, and an example of beauty and beauty.

Its point is also successful; Its success has also been destroyed. Everything comes to an end and becomes one. Only those who achieve their goals know that common sense is one, and they will not use it, but tolerate all kinds of mediocrity. If you are mediocre, you can use it; Use also, pass also; If you pass, you will get it; Just enough. Because it is already, it is already unknown, and this is the Tao.

Everything in the world is a horse.

Using referential metaphor to refer to non-reference, and not referring to non-reference with non-reference metaphor; A horse is not a horse, a horse is not a horse. Everything is a horse at the point of heaven and earth.

(Use fingers to explain that fingers are not fingers, it is better to use non-fingers to explain that fingers are not fingers; Using a white horse to explain that a white horse is not a horse is better than using a non-white horse to explain that a white horse is not a horse. From the point of view that Tao is one and everything is one, heaven and earth are just a finger, and everything is just a horse, and there is no difference. This explanation comes from another book that readers refer to.

Metaphor refers to non-metaphor, non-metaphor refers to metaphor, metaphor refers to horse and non-horse, and non-horse refers to horse. After a long time, what do you mean by horse? Or is the horse pointing at you? I don't know.

"Heaven and earth point, everything is a lion". Everything in this universe is equal to a lion. Lions have heads, tails and feet, and countless hairs. Every hair represents the lion, but every hair is not the lion.

"Heaven and earth point, everything is a horse", which is a famous saying of Zhuangzi, and many people have realized it. Zhuangzi's sentence is the expression of the unity of mind and matter. The world is a finger, not this finger, but what this finger refers to. "Everything is a horse" and everything in the universe is like a horse.

Finally together

It's okay. It's okay. When the Tao is done, it will naturally become. Evil? However, is it evil or not? Otherwise, it is not. Things are human beings, things are human beings. If there is nothing, there is nothing. Therefore, it is an example of success and failure, an example of success and failure, and an example of beauty and beauty.

The concept of right and wrong allows us to distinguish whether it should be or not. "It is possible, it is impossible." Whether this can be done depends entirely on subjectivity; It is our idea to be able to do it, and we can't do it if we can't. There is no concept of right and wrong outside the heart in the universe. His conclusion tells us that "when the Tao is done, it will naturally become." If you want to become this Tao and return to the metaphysical Tao, you can only become a Tao if you implement it and do something really.

"Things are natural", everything in the universe is right when we think it is right, and wrong when it is wrong. This thing is called whatever it is, and everything is an idealized effect. Therefore, the metaphysical Tao, "acting in moderation", can only be achieved by practice; Everything in the material world is man-made, and what you think is what it is, that is, "things are what it is."

"Evil? However, is it evil or not? Otherwise, it is not. " He said, "Is it evil?" What is the right thing to do? "Ran Yu Ran", your idea is right, otherwise it is idealism; "Is it evil?" What do you think is wrong? "Otherwise, otherwise." Either your idea is wrong.

Things are what they are, objects have their special properties and everything is inherent, so everything has its own standards and positioning. Water has the use of water, and fire has the use of fire. This is the case in physics. But metaphysically, "nothing is nothing, nothing is impossible." "Returning to the Tao body, fire and water become the original energy, just a kind of energy, so it explains a truth:" So, it is to fight for the fight, sharp and beautiful, restore the singularity, and the Tao is one. " "Zhou" is a straw, "Tan" is a curse, "Li" and "Li" are ugly and ugly, and "Li" is the first beauty stone in ancient times. People's present situation, personality, psychology and so on are different. He only talked about four categories: "restoration", open-minded and generous, regardless of anything; Hey ",the mind is very narrow; Hey ",very cunning; Weird ",very weird. These four are the external status quo, each with its own differences.

Ugly ugly, beautiful beauty, thin thin, thick thick, big mind, narrow narrow, cunning cunning, ancient eccentric. Each is different, the phenomenon is different, and the function is different, that is, "what is inherent in things is inherent in things."

However, "the unity of Tao" is something in metaphysics. For example, a person, good-looking or not, turns into bones after death, bones turn to ashes, beautiful or not, all are empty, that is "one"; Thatched straw, like a big stigma, turns to ash. This is also "one". Therefore, in the final analysis, it is still "the Tao is one."

Its point is also successful; Its success has also been destroyed. Everything comes to an end and becomes one. Only those who achieve their goals know that common sense is one, and they will not use it, but tolerate all kinds of mediocrity. If you are mediocre, you can use it; Use also, pass also; If you pass, you will get it; Just enough. Because it is already, it is already unknown, and this is the Tao.

"Its points also, into also; Its success was also destroyed. " This is the truth of physics. When one thing is separated, it is also a time of success. For example, after rice is cut, processed and ground into powder, it can be divided into many delicious things, and "the division is also successful." Communication is the beginning of another life. It means that the couple got married and gave birth to more than a dozen children, and these two people differentiated into a big family. However, "its success is also destroyed" is "the death of the party." When it succeeds, it is when it begins to be destroyed. For example, this house, when we successfully opened it, this day has already begun to be destroyed, and it will be broken slowly, and this house will be broken forever. So the conclusion is that "everything is successful and destroyed, and it is one." Nothing in the world is called success, nothing is eternal, and nothing is eternal destruction. Empty for a long time, naturally formed. The formation of this existence, coupled with the combination of many karma, will naturally exist, is a natural existence, and finally return to one.

Ordinary high wisdom

"The only one who knows everything is one, so he doesn't have to use it. If you are mediocre, you can use it; Use also, pass also; If you pass, you will get it; Just a few. "

Metaphysics between heaven and earth, there is no success or failure, right and wrong, good and evil. However, all phenomena in the physical world are uneven, while in the metaphysical world, they are uniform and "reconnected into one". Only those who truly get the word, "unity of knowledge and action", return to metaphysics as one; This is not one, but an absolute one. Therefore, people who are enlightened, "because they don't need it, they tolerate all kinds of mediocrity" and always don't need it. The so-called "putting all kinds of mediocrity together in order not to use it" is the mediocrity of the golden mean. This mediocrity means "use".

"Yong also, use also; Use also, pass also; People who understand have also got it. " Only those who know the Tao can get this mediocrity and mediocrity. Why? He himself has something to explain here, "enough is enough." I got this, which is what it says above, "Take it from the ring and make it infinite." The center of the circle is straight, and it is straight, not curved. "Comfortable", come on. "And a few", a few, all the same.

"Because it is already, it is already unknown, and this is the Tao." What do you mean by "putting everything into practice without using it"? Mediocrity is not sloppy, not identical, but just right. In other words, mediocrity is not mediocrity and is called mediocrity by later generations. High intelligence is extremely high, but it looks ordinary. This is a mediocre truth that can be applied to its precepts.

I'm not used to changing my mind.

Trying to understand one without knowing one is called "Trident Street". What is "Tide III"? Yue: I was given the honor of being a spy. Yue: I'm not four against three. All the snipers are angry. Yue: However, it is four sides and three sides. Everyone is very happy. It is also because the name is not worthy of the name and it is used angrily. So it is called the "two lines" between saints and right and wrong.

This passage is a curse and the clearest warning to the world. We don't know how to take advantage of this mediocrity. People who think they are clever like to play with their own cleverness, so cleverness is mistaken by cleverness. Where do fools suffer? I don't know how to play with my own stupidity, so I'm even more stupid. Smart people play with their own cleverness, so they are also stupid. Then why are these people stupid? "I didn't even bother to make it clear that it was the same thing" is to drill my spirit and intelligence to a point. This, not the one where Tao is integrated, is a dead end. "I don't know the same", but I don't know how to drill Datong. What are the names of these people? It's called chop and change.

People in the world are like this group of monkeys played by smart people; Anyway, it's just seven chestnuts for you. Different schedules, different seats, you don't know how happy you are! Call you an asshole, and you will fly into a rage; Hello, sir, I'm sorry, you are the best in the world, long live, you will be happy. Actually, it's all played by others. This is the truth of the three changes. So his final conclusion is "not worthy of the name", which is equal to the old man who feeds monkeys. Chestnuts are still fed seven times a day, and there is no change. Everyone can't stand it unless they change their minds.

Someone who knows how to reconcile.

"It is a saint rather than a non-saint, so it is called two lines." Metaphysical Tao is nothing but nothingness, neither good nor evil; Physiologically, there are right and wrong, good and evil. Then, the holiness of Tao lies in the shape of Tao. How can people get along with each other? The word "he" is right and wrong, and the right and wrong should be reconciled. This "harmony" is the "mediocrity" of the mean. So some people think that The Doctrine of the Mean is based on Zhuangzi. The Doctrine of the Mean also mentions the "harmony" of neutralization, "achieving the status of neutralization and heaven, and educating all things". Therefore, Taoist saints know that there is right and wrong in form, and they are getting sharper and sharper, so they have to reconcile and neutralize right and wrong. It would be much better to be neutral and humane.

However, it is necessary to go further. This is a noun in Zhuangzi. Heaven represents the metaphysical way; Jun is balance; As beautiful as heaven and earth. How can it be called fairness? Give you trouble during the day and rest at night! That's fair again. In the middle of this harmony, we understand the nature between heaven and earth, and rest on Tianjun, which Zhuangzi called "two lines".

All points will succeed, and all successes will be destroyed. So on the whole, there is no such thing as completion and destruction, and everything is always one. Only knowledgeable people can understand the seamless truth of everything, so they don't have to stick to the prejudice of ordinary people, but rely on the respective functions of everything. This is just following the nature of things. Conforming to nature without knowing why, this is the so-called "Tao". Debaters strive for consistency, but they don't know that everything is inherently chaotic. This is the so-called "three sides". What is "three to three"? There is an old man who keeps monkeys. He gave the monkey acorns and said, "Three liters in the morning and four liters at night." The monkeys were very angry. The old man changed his mouth and said, "Then four liters in the morning and three liters in the evening." All the monkeys are happy. The name and actual number of acorns have never increased, but the mood of monkeys is different. Here, the old-age monkey only obeys the subjective feelings of the monkey. Therefore, saints do not cling to right or wrong, but follow the balance of nature. This is the parallel of things and me, and each has its place. ) This passage is from another reference book. )