1. 2017 National Examination Essay Skills: Analysis of Quotations and Aphorisms

Composition writing has always been a "stumbling block" for candidates to obtain high scores in the essay examination. We have concluded that many candidates Whether it is the title, structure, setting of the beginning of the essay, or the structure of the arguments, I am not very troubled. Only the argument part after the arguments cannot be filled in. In the past, most candidates chose to "copy" materials to solve this problem. question, but the scores are extremely disappointing. In fact, there are still many argumentation methods to help candidates complete the content filling. Below, we will lead you to learn a "high-level" argumentation method-the analysis of famous quotes and aphorisms.

The so-called famous aphorism analysis method, as the name suggests, is to introduce famous aphorisms (including ancient poems, leaders’ speeches, or opinions of experts and scholars) in the argument part, and through the introduction of famous aphorisms, the theoretical height and the theoretical level of the argument part of the composition can be improved. Authoritative writing, so that our compositions can be more attractive to examiners and win their favor. So specifically, the writing idea of ??the famous aphorism analysis method should emphasize: "argument points + famous aphorisms + explanation (enlightenment) of the aphorisms + material case filling + rebate points". Let us give an example to elaborate and explain it in detail to facilitate candidates' better learning and understanding.

Building a rule-of-law country requires improving people’s legal awareness and cultivating their legal literacy. The famous French scholar Rousseau emphasized in "The Social Contract": "The most important law among all laws is neither engraved on a bell nor engraved on marble, but engraved on the hearts of the people." This sentence warns us To build a country under the rule of law, we must have people with certain legal awareness and legal literacy as the foundation. XXXXX material case "Media Trial". Therefore, we need to actively improve people's legal awareness and cultivate people's legal literacy in order to effectively build a rule-of-law country. (Therefore, it is necessary to increase the intensity of legal publicity to the public, and achieve the coverage and popularization of legal publicity through legal lectures, law into campuses, into communities, etc., so as to effectively improve the public's legal awareness and cultivate legal literacy.)

The famous saying and aphorism analysis method is relatively "high-end" and is more likely to be favored by examiners. However, candidates are required to actively collect and recite relevant famous sayings and aphorisms after class in order to accumulate more sufficient knowledge and avoid the problem of "plagiarizing" materials in the exam. We hope that candidates can learn and absorb better and make their own Articles can achieve better results.

2. 2015 National Civil Service Examination Application Preparation: Argumentative Article Selection:

The facts and truths used to prove the argument are called arguments. According to its own nature and characteristics, arguments can be divided into two categories: factual arguments and rational arguments (also called factual arguments).

1. Basic requirements

1. The arguments must be true

True means consistent with reality and the logic of life. Only when the arguments are solid and reliable can the arguments be fully and forcefully proven and can the arguments be irrefutably persuasive.

Arguments contain many key points. For example, factual arguments generally include key points such as time, place, person, process, cause, result, quantity, etc. If one of the key points is wrong, it will make people laugh and expose the argument. False flaws caused the edifice of discussion that he had painstakingly built to collapse.

It is also possible to use fables as arguments. Although the fable is fictional, its meaning is consistent with the logic of life and can reveal the truth in life. In the same way, examples from famous works can also be used, but they should be used with caution. Be careful to avoid making inaccurate arguments due to your own biased understanding of literary works.

2. The arguments must be accurate

Accurate means that the arguments must be consistent with the argument and be able to prove the argument. If it has nothing to do with the argument, no matter how vivid the argument is, it cannot be used. When choosing arguments, we should pay attention to: the specific materials used as arguments are often multi-faceted. If analyzed from different angles, different meanings can be discovered. Therefore, one argument can often explain many truths at the same time. Therefore, we must pay attention to starting from the needs of the argument and paying attention to flexibly tailoring the arguments to adapt the arguments to the arguments.

3. The arguments must be typical

That is to say, the arguments must be able to reveal the essence and laws of things, be representative and inevitable. When answering the essay, candidates must choose the most typical and representative materials, not accidental individual phenomena.

Typical materials have a larger capacity for thinking, are the most illustrative and meaningful. It does not have to be a major subject matter, nor does it have to be completely formed; it can be obtained through processing and refining, or a typical argument can be selected and cut into several pieces to serve the corresponding sub-points of the argument.

In order to select typical materials, when using theoretical arguments and factual arguments, it is best for candidates to "select based on famous people", that is, use famous quotes and examples. Speeches made by unknown people such as "someone said" and "someone said" are often "little words" and lack weight.

4. The arguments should be rich

This is not a mandatory requirement. For an argumentative essay to be convincing, the arguments must be rich. Simply having more in quantity does not necessarily mean richness, it may just give people a feeling of heaping. Only by selecting materials from different fields and angles can the arguments be enriched.

Let me give you a simple and clear four-character formula: ancient and modern, Chinese and foreign.

5. The arguments should be novel

Try to use novel arguments so that the article can be lively and attractive. The so-called novel can be materials that have never been seen before, or materials that have been available before but are understood from a new perspective. When selecting arguments, if candidates can innovate and use old materials in new ways, they will be able to write articles with highlights. To be "new", you need to pay more attention to things around you and accumulate recent hot events; or reuse old materials from a new angle.

2. How to extract arguments from materials

Candidates must be good at using materials skillfully. The "skill" here mainly refers to finding the correct angle of using materials, and determining the weight, priority, detail and emotional color of the materials. No matter how good the argument is, if it is used improperly, it will not be able to play its role in expressing the theme. The same argument often has different sides, which can explain different problems. When using it, you must pay attention to finding an angle that is consistent with the center, and connect the argument with the argument to make them closely related. Candidates must learn to perform the necessary processing of materials. Able to transform complex materials into simple materials according to the need to express the central argument, or expand simple materials into complex materials, combine scattered materials into complete materials, and transform materials that are inconsistent with the center into complete materials with the center. Consistent materials. However, it should be noted that when writing an essay, the description of the material must be summarized and concise, and try to avoid being complicated and wordy.