Guo qinxian
This year's graduation defense has been completely over, but as a teacher involved, I still have a lot of feelings. In my opinion, graduation defense is a comprehensive assessment of college students' knowledge level and comprehensive quality, as well as a targeted examination of the depth of school teaching and education or graduation topics. Although the defense process is only a short ten or twenty minutes, it is the concentration of students' personal knowledge and ability, and the fragment display and reproduction of the teaching and teacher training achievements at all levels in the school.
Through graduation defense, it can reflect how much knowledge and skills students have mastered during their school days and how to improve their manners and comprehensive cultivation. Throughout the whole process of postgraduate defense, we can clearly see the differences between different students:
Those students who study hard and are good at research and exploration have accumulated a lot of basic theories and professional knowledge. The graduation thesis has clear topics, high theoretical level, rich content and good grades. Some of them have even far exceeded the requirements of their tutors. In the process of defense, they quoted the topic, which not only clarified the research depth of the topic, but also analyzed the new problems and self-expression deficiencies they found in the research process. Their thesis writing level is very high, the content is very substantial, and their defense is handy and Kan Kan-style. They can not only answer every question raised by the teacher smoothly, but also clearly state their next efforts and explore ways. These are inseparable from the usual emphasis and strengthening of knowledge accumulation.
There are also some students who can collect information according to the topics given by their tutors, carefully organize research, and use what they have learned in graduation design as much as possible. Although their topics are not too big, their contents are relatively substantial, and they can really understand the theme and details of the research topic and have an accurate positioning of their own subject level. What they lack is the ability to actively point out the research direction or deep-seated problems, but on the whole, their performance is also good. Without the usual knowledge accumulation, it is impossible to do this step.
In graduation defense, there are also some students whose research projects are far from the requirements of teachers. From their thesis writing and defense performance, we find that the data collection of these students is not comprehensive, and some of them are even outdated; In the process of research, it is also perfunctory, patchwork, and the theoretical basis is too thin to talk about any results. When answering the teacher's question, I was in a hurry because of nervousness, and even sweated my clothes, and my answers were very confusing. All these show that college life has not left them anything of value. In recent years, I have basically played in Shui Piao. I am ashamed of my parents, ashamed of myself and ashamed of training my own school and teachers when I graduate with such achievements.
In college life, there is bound to be the joy of harvest, the calmness of contentment, and the shame and regret of some students. As a teacher, I sincerely hope that what I say here can inspire new students. I hope you can calmly face yesterday's victory or defeat, calm your mind and make every effort to paint a bright future.
The new environment will also bring new challenges, new knowledge and new problems, all of which require you to improvise. As long as you can correctly treat yesterday's success or failure, as long as you have persistent accumulation and never give up confidence, success will favor you. Every day in college life, we should always keep in mind the importance of knowledge accumulation, learn every course well, accumulate every learning achievement, and lay a solid foundation for graduation in a few years. The success of each academic year is the ladder of graduation success. Only by taking every step down-to-earth can we reach the final peak.
Success is personal, so is failure! As the old saying goes: I wish the students success in thinking, learning and life!
The usual knowledge accumulation is very important]
Click rate: 893 Release date: March 24, 2004
The civil service examination pays more and more attention to the assessment of comprehensive knowledge and ability, which can be said to be my first feeling of participating in this year's civil service examination for provincial organs.
Speaking of the original intention of applying for civil servants, I just want more employment opportunities, and I haven't considered too much about others. Because I was busy with other things, I didn't have time to read the counseling book carefully after signing up. I only read 1 hour tutorial before the exam. I was rushed into the examination room before I mastered the main points of writing the application.
When I got the application problem, the big stone hanging in my heart suddenly fell to the ground, and my heart was no longer nervous. Energy shortage problem? The topic of this exam is very popular; Three problems also follow the old road: what kind of problems to reflect and how to solve them. Finally, write an argumentative essay of 1000 words. After reading it roughly, you can start writing. But it needs a lot of argument. When I think of famous sayings and historical allusions, I just sit there because I forget them. What makes me laugh and cry even more is that my article actually uses the first person throughout, and I didn't know until I finished the exam and tried to read the counseling book that it was best not to have the word "I" in the argumentative essay. Only then did I understand the truth that "when books are used, I don't hate them so much", and I regretted wasting all my good time on computers and games.
The afternoon exam is an administrative ability test, more like a hodgepodge, including mathematics, history, politics, economy, literature, graphic analysis, logical reasoning and other knowledge. Although many topics are novel, their common characteristics are that they are linked to life, and there are fewer topics for rote memorization and more topics for testing ability.
This exam is more about basic knowledge, and a lot of knowledge needs to be accumulated at ordinary times. Many problems are common sense in daily life, but if you don't pay attention, you will be very tired. There is a question, which is heavier, 3.8 Jin of oil or 4 Jin of citrus? This exam has not only the conversion between kilometers and nautical miles, but also the expression of glasses diopter and beer degree, which need to be accumulated at ordinary times. This time, many problems related to life are relatively simple at first glance, but when I think about it carefully, I find a sinkhole. In addition, the proportion of basic knowledge is also very large, such as math problems, Chinese problems, history problems, etc., most of which are basic knowledge of junior and senior high schools. Geometric series, arithmetic progression, permutation and combination, solid geometry and so on are all shown in the first part of the math problem; The second part of the language error correction and induction questions, in the high school Chinese classroom practice is also more. However, although the problems are relatively simple, many simple problems have been forgotten in practice. For example, when it comes to which treaty the Qing government signed with Britain, which gave Britain one-sided MFN treatment and a tariff of "five tenths", I can't make up my mind about the two options of Beijing Treaty and Tianjin Treaty. I don't have a solid grasp of many basic knowledge, which makes me find it difficult to do.
Although I didn't review well, I regret it, but through this exam, I understand the importance of accumulating more knowledge at ordinary times, which is a great gain from this exam.
Knowledge accumulation is the most important, and it is best to emphasize two points in practice strengthening: (1), if the answering skills are separated from a lot of practice training and your own summary, it is "an armchair strategist, nothing"; (2) Anyone can constantly sum up his answering skills and typesetting mode by referring to the answers. There is no need to write exactly the answer. The key is to find out what the main points are! ! ! Doing the above work well is actually the process of implementing my "five-stage review plan". A few tips for doing subjective questions well: 1, you are quite familiar with all the important knowledge points in the textbook guide, which is "point"; 2. Have a very familiar grasp of the knowledge context and conceptual logical subordination of each chapter, which is called "line"; 3. Cross-chapter and even interdisciplinary related knowledge points can be integrated, which is the "face"; 4. The above three points are the requirements for knowledge, and the last point is the application of skills: do more questions and pay attention to summing up the rules of answering questions. This is the "needle", connecting the "point-line-surface" on it. ★★★★ What are the two types of analysis questions? What are their answering modes and skills? 1, popular saying type (proverb type): for example, "black words on a white background are undeniable" and "father's debt has been paid" Steps: read the title 1-2 times-translate it into legal terms. Obtaining the test center (the most difficult and crucial step)-sorting out the knowledge points and judging the proverbs as a whole-preparing for answering questions: judging right or wrong-discussing theoretical knowledge points-discussing with proverbs-and drawing correct conclusions. 2. Small case type: It is similar to a big case example, but it is not considered as a plate question like a big case, so after grasping the "eye of the question", there should be a general answer template. ★★★★ How to give points for essay questions? What is the source of the answer to the essay question? What is the answer format of the essay question? How to unfold the composition questions? The content is divided into four parts: the meaning of basic concepts; Key arguments; Expand some necessary knowledge points; The "hard words" of the extended part; . Basis for answering questions: they are basically from the guide, which can cross chapters and subjects, so it is very important to review the topics. The most important thing left is to search for relevant chapters and specific knowledge points from the brain; For those that may exceed the guideline or outline, answer if there is one. Hey? lt； Br> basically follows the "total-sub-total mode" and "what-why-how to do it" mode, and at the same time, it can be discussed in its own words without deviating from the theme. Answering steps: Read the question 1-2 times-get the theme or eye of the question-search the knowledge points stored in the brain that may be related to it-sort out the answering ideas, write a draft (generally designed according to the idea of "what-why-how to do it")-answer and discuss (pay attention to some important knowledge points to be inserted into the discussion). Comments: Discussion questions can not only examine candidates' professional knowledge, but also examine candidates' adaptability and application ability, language expression and organization ability, and comprehensive induction ability. Essay questions generally involve a wide range (they can cross chapters or even subjects, and knowledge points are scattered in many chapters and subjects) and have considerable depth (so they need to be discussed, such as what to answer, how and why). For an argument), it leaves a broad space for candidates to play freely (closely around the topic), which is an examination of candidates' comprehensive ability (the ability to distinguish and identify knowledge points, the ability to collect, summarize and refine knowledge points, the ability to express words in combination, and the ability to think logically). All these can be summed up in one point: it is definitely not the most ideal question to examine the basic skills of law. The high score of the composition topic has a great influence on the candidates' performance, and it is often the topic that opens the score. Pay attention to the following points: (1) The viewpoint is clear. Especially when answering why and how, the viewpoints should be clearly listed one by one, and it is best to discuss each viewpoint in a professional way. (2) appropriately expand. As for the essay questions, you should start with the breadth and depth, expand appropriately, and show your solid legal knowledge, extensive knowledge, flexible application ability and good theoretical literacy. Generally, the number of words should be around 600-800, neither too little nor too much. Expansion itself may be a short answer, or it can be expanded by explaining concepts, comparing various kinds, and excavating important knowledge points. (3) Rigorous structure. The why part or how part of the essay question should be answered in the form of a short essay, which is rigorous in structure and echoes before and after. Generally, it is "summary at the beginning, discussion in the middle and summary at the end". (4) Give full play. When answering essay questions, candidates should give full play to the basic principles, not limited to the contents of textbooks. If you are not familiar with the topic, answer all the contents related to the topic you know, but be careful not to destroy the overall structure. ★★★★ Steps of civil law case analysis? Read the topic carefully-find out the civil subjects involved-find out the specific civil acts of the subjects-and summarize the legal relations between the subjects (such as special tort, mortgage, neighboring relations, etc.). ), this is the most critical step! )-Summarize the controversial issues (such as contract validity, tort liability sharing, subject qualification, etc.). )-according to the questions asked, find a specific knowledge test site involving a specific legal relationship. ★★★★ What are the steps and difficulties of criminal law case analysis? Step 1: Read the question carefully ―― Find out the specific behavior of the suspect ―― Determine the possible charges ―― Analyze the four elements and laws to determine the correct charges ―― Answer the questions according to the various situations of the suspect (such as age, subjective thoughts, occupation, etc.). ) the title is given. Step 2: Compared with multiple-choice questions, case analysis questions in criminal law focus more on the mastery and application of basic knowledge. To accurately answer the case analysis questions, it is more important to follow the following steps: 1. Read the case carefully. Case analysis questions are generally the most important content in criminal law exams or extremely special provisions in laws, that is, the most basic concepts or legal provisions. As long as you understand the concepts and legal provisions thoroughly, you will be more confident in the exam. 2. Identify the "knowledge points" of the issues involved in the case. In case analysis, the following knowledge points may often be involved: the general part, including: (1) the determination of criminal intent and negligence and accidents; (2) The scope of responsibility of persons who are over 14 years old but under 16 years old; (3) Conditions for the establishment of justifiable defense; (4) The distinction between crime preparation, attempted crime and suspension; (5) the establishment conditions of joint crime and the identification of joint offenders (principal, accessory, coerced accessory, instigator); (6) Recidivism and surrender in the application of penalty. Each part, including: crimes against public security, crimes against citizens' personal rights, crimes against property, crimes of corruption and bribery, and crimes of dereliction of duty, are traditional investigation contents, and case analysis will involve these crimes in principle. 3. Clarify the thinking of answering questions. After determining the knowledge points involved in the case analysis, don't rush to answer the questions, but also further sort out the answering ideas. At this time, we need to consider: (1) combine the specific theory with the general theory of criminal law to avoid separating the general theory of criminal law from the general theory of criminal law; (2) Pay attention to accurately define the boundaries between crime and non-crime, and between this crime and that crime. Some case analysis questions, the relationship between this crime and that crime is extremely subtle, and you need to accurately judge the nature of the case before you can answer it, otherwise even a long speech is useless. 4. Use different methods to answer questions accurately. When answering questions, we should consider the concepts or regulations and judicial interpretations involved in each case, and clearly link and recall these concepts, regulations or judicial interpretations. To answer all the case analysis questions, we must first draw the respondents' own conclusions: whether the criminals are guilty; Is this sin or that sin; Whether it is a separate crime or a joint crime; Whether it is intentional crime or negligent crime; Whether it is an act crime or an omission crime; Whether it is a natural person crime or a unit crime; Is it one crime or several crimes, etc. At the same time, we should pay attention to the concrete analysis of specific problems and adopt different analysis methods for different types of questions: (1) For the questions of "crime and non-crime", we need to firmly grasp the analytical tool of "elements of crime" and consider whether the behavior of the actor fully meets the four elements. (2) For the question type of "this crime and that crime", what is the most fundamental sign of the difference between different crimes? (3) For the "special forms" of some crimes, such as whether they are joint crimes, attempted or suspended, whether they are combined punishment for several crimes, etc. , need to consider various forms of establishment conditions. (4) For the problem of "how to deal with criminals", it is necessary to consider whether the perpetrator is a recidivist, whether to surrender, and whether there are special penalties such as probation and parole. In the method of answering questions, when answering case analysis questions, the language should be concise and well-founded (based on legal provisions and criminal law theory), and it is forbidden to be irrelevant, subjective and simply pile up words. ★★★★ Why are constitutional cases and precedent cases so difficult? How to break through? How to grasp the "problem eye" First, it is strongly recommended that you pay attention to some hot issues and collect such rare cases. Secondly, I suggest that you thoroughly understand the hot and important chapters about NPC system, election system and basic theory of rule of law in the Guide. ★★★★ How to get more points for subjective questions that you can't do? 1. Discuss the basic concepts in the topic and discuss them in your own words. The content of relevant chapters can be graded by moving in. 2. Case topics can be graded step by step. The former question helps the latter to get more points. ★★★★★ What are the two types of analysis items of criminal law articles? What are their respective answering modes and difficulties? Rule-based: (almost for everyone, strive for full marks) generally follow the following five steps: 1. What crime is this law about-pay attention to the rigorous expression and think that the crime is unique; 2. Whether this crime is a state crime, a blank crime, or a commission crime requires understanding the relevant basic knowledge. 3. Analyze the article according to the constitutive elements of the crime-the difficult part, that is, the four constitutive elements, and don't make mistakes in the key parts, such as the object part and the main part, one is one and the other is two, so there is not much room for play; The objective part is almost an appropriate extension of the law. 4. Explain some concepts involved in the law-this step can be taken out separately, and these basic concepts can be explained in the expansion part of the four elements, such as "coercion", "in use" and "national staff"; 5. To determine the type of statutory punishment for this crime, most of our criminal laws are relatively certain statutory punishments-the law is obvious. In short, the analysis of legal provisions is actually a simple discussion of the characteristics of each crime source. As long as the answer is clear, according to the above steps, the score of this question is still easy to get, but some details and mistakes often lead to people not getting full marks, so everyone must have a solid foundation in learning. Ordinary type: ★ Answering methods and precautions for civil law text analysis? It mainly includes: an overview of the legal content-the legislative purpose (if there is a guide, it can also be inferred by itself)-the explanation of basic concepts-legal characteristics (basically the discussion of concept keywords)-legal consequences (difficulties)-supplementary details.
"Full-Score Author" Comments Writing Style Innovation and Knowledge Accumulation are the Most Important
2003-6-24 10:37:25
Every year, many students hope to learn from the perfect composition of the college entrance examination. Yesterday, Shi Jing reporter found Ma Jun, the author of this year's perfect composition "Seeing the World with Eyes" in Zhuzhou No.4 Middle School. Avantgarde writing style and extensive knowledge are the main reasons for his successful writing.
Ma Jun's Seeing the World with Eyes is an argumentative paper, but it is an avant-garde web design scheme in form. Ma Jun skillfully expressed his relationship between emotion and cognition through the popular subtitles such as related topics, related links and current affairs mining on the Internet.
Ma Jun, a college entrance examination candidate: "I like this avant-garde expression, which may be related to my usual love for the Internet."
The reporter found that Ma Jun, at a young age, used historical allusions at his fingertips. Commenting on his college entrance examination composition, he said that the materials he wrote even came from his knowledge of history, geography and philosophy.
Tutor: "The trick of drawing materials is to take a little from nature, collect a little from history and learn a little from reality."
It is worth mentioning that Ma Jun insisted on watching the news every day during the most tense period of senior three review. He told reporters that he could constantly update his information from the news. The clever use of American Foreign Policy in the article "Seeing the World with Eyes" and the materials for medical staff to fight against SARS all come from TV news. Liang Shuo and Chen Shufeng report.
Usually accumulation is the most important.
-
Release date: 05- 1 1-04 Source: 5 1 IELTS visits: 5
I just saw Comrade Haqiu's post and couldn't help saying a few words. I just received the long-awaited IELTS score today, but I didn't feel very nervous when I opened the report card, because I called the test center in advance to ask about the total score. But I'm still a little surprised at my achievements. My listening comprehension is 6.5, which I never dreamed of. Like Haqiu, I feel dead of hearing. When I came back to recall, I got 13- 15 or even more, but I got 6.5. I think the average score must be lowered, so all the comrades preparing roast duck should remember that when they encounter new questions in the examination room, they must be calm and take their time, because it is a new question for you and the same for others! Two days ago, I saw the score of 4 19 reported by several netizens, especially the listening comprehension, which seems to be not very high (4 19 listening comprehension is an old problem). Does this also explain some problems? So in the final analysis, the most important thing is the usual practice, the well is very important, but you are still completely dependent on it!
Besides reading, I don't know if it's because listening comprehension of 4 12 is too difficult. In order to find a balance, the questioner gave me a set of very simple reading materials (I think it is really simple). After reading the test, I once wanted to get a score of 7.5-8, but actually I only got a score of 6.5, which really disappointed me in unknown so! ! So everyone must avoid falling into my mind. Sometimes I feel that simple things may not get high marks. In fact, when I usually do reading exercises, my scores are all around 6-6.5. It is normal to get such a score!
As for writing, it should be expected that I get 6 points. Although the topic of the composition is predicted in advance, so is the composition, and so is your level. Even if it is written in advance, it may not improve much. Sometimes even if a teacher helps you revise it, you can only write it yourself in the end (of course, it will be different if an expert helps you write it). But the only advantage is time. Don't be too nervous to finish the composition exam. This may be the only advantage of knowing the topic of the composition in advance (only representing personal views). But I have to remind you, don't think that the exam time is enough and too slow just because you wrote a big composition in advance. That's what I did, so that I didn't leave more time for the small composition. This is a big cake that I'm not good at. I think my essay must be quite low this time. I think most candidates set the goal of their composition at 6 points. Although I dream of getting 7 points, it seems really not easy at present. Of course, if you have absolutely enough time to prepare for the exam, it is not impossible to write every article carefully, find an expert to correct it, and then correct it yourself according to the expert's advice! And I don't have so much time before the exam! !
Finally, speaking English, my oral English is average, because I have prepared the exam questions, so I don't find it difficult. In fact, I feel very good after the exam, and I don't know if I can get 7 points, but I actually only got 6 points. I prepared the oral English topic for a short time in advance, and I took the exam as a "best friend". It may be a common topic, but there is nothing new to say. Although I speak fluently, I may be.
Anyway, now that I have got the grades, I feel much more comfortable, and the total score of 6.5 is barely satisfactory. I am still very happy that my efforts for several months have not been in vain! After reading this post, everyone must know that I am not an IELTS master at all. Maybe my experience is not worth watching for many people, but I still hope to give you some tips and help, so I am very satisfied! In addition, in the days of preparing for the exam, I have accumulated some experience more or less, whether for the exam or for reference materials or review methods. I am happy to give some help to those friends whose level is similar to or lower than mine (I say this because I am unable to help those friends whose level is higher than mine, hehe), and I have also accumulated some oral and composition materials. Because it is written on paper, I can't contribute to you. These are my own ideas, some of which may not be very fresh and special, but I often encounter such a problem when preparing for the exam, that is, I really can't think of anything to say about one or several questions or topics, which is very painful, so now I have finished the exam. If anyone needs my help, I will try my best. You can write to me, as long as I have time, I will definitely reply.