After reading a book, an article, a paragraph, or a few famous quotes, you write an article about your specific feelings and inspirations. After reading, you can also call reading notes. It is a commonly used article. The applied style is also one of the styles studied in applied writing.

The so-called "feeling" can be the truth or exquisite thoughts learned from the book, it can be the thinking and association inspired by the content of the book, it can be the determination and determination inspired by reading. Ideals can also be criticism and satire of certain ugly phenomena in society caused by reading. The expression of feelings after reading is flexible and diverse, and it basically belongs to the category of argumentation, but the writing method is different from ordinary argumentative essays, because it must be based on feelings after reading. To write a review that is experienced, insightful, emotional, and innovative, you must pay attention to the following points:

First of all, you must read the original text well. The "feel" in the "review" is caused by "reading" of. "Reading" is the basis of "feeling". If you read it casually, you may not even understand what the original work is about, so how can you feel it? If you read it superficially, you will certainly not feel it deeply. Only by reading carefully can you feel something and feel deeply. If you want to read an argumentative essay, you need to figure out its arguments (opinions and claims), or what wrong ideas you criticize, think about what inspirations you have received, and figure out what the arguments and conclusions are. If it is a narrative, you need to figure out its main plot, how many characters there are, what is the relationship between them, and the year and month in which the story takes place. The social background involved in the work must also be clearly understood through the narration of people, what kind of spiritual qualities of the characters are revealed in the work, what kind of social phenomena are reflected, what thoughts and feelings of the author are expressed, which chapters of the work move people, and why So touching and so on.

Secondly, to rank your favorite points, you only need to read the original work carefully. There are many aspects of an article that can be written into your impressions after reading it. If you feel deeply about the center of the original text, you can write it as a post-reading feeling. If you feel deeply about other contents of the original text, you can also write it as a post-reading feeling. If you feel deeply about individual sentences, you can also write it as a post-reading feeling. In short, as long as it is the content of the original work and you have feelings about it, you can write a review. You need to express everything you know in order to write a good review.

Third, choose the right points of reflection. In an article, you can list many points of reflection. However, you can only discuss one center in a post-reading review, and you must not cover everything. Therefore, the following is a summary of these many feelings. Screen and compare the points to find out the one that you have the deepest feelings, the latest perspective, the most realistic relevance, and the one that feels smooth when you write it. Use it as the center of your feelings after reading it, and then argue it into a paper.

Fourth, the narrative should be simple. Since the feelings after reading are generated by reading, then in the article, you should describe the facts that caused the "feeling", and sometimes describe some examples that you think of. In a word, "narration" is indispensable in the impression after reading. But it is different from the requirement of "narration" in narrative writing. The "narrative" in narrative essays emphasizes concreteness, image, and vividness, while the "narrative" in post-reading essays emphasizes simplicity and conciseness. It does not require "touching" but only requires the ability to draw out the truth. When beginners write and read, the common problem is that the narrative is not concise and it actually becomes a retelling. This is mainly because the author cannot grasp the spirit and key points of the part he wants to quote, so he cannot be concise. Conciseness does not mean that the fewer words, the better, but conciseness should also be clear.

Fifth, we should pay attention to the form of association. The forms of association include the same association (the things associated are the same), the opposite association (the things associated are opposite), and the related association (the things associated are the same). There are many kinds of associations (correlation between things), inheritance association (things in association are inheritance), similar association (things in association are similar), etc. When writing and reading, special attention should be paid to the use of the two forms of association, the same association and the similar association.