I've been thinking about Lightyear these days. I'm ignorant and haven't read many books. Agua always laughs at me because I'm stuck in the mud between men and women and can't pull it out. After all, Weininger did it. I really want to pull it out. I don't know where men and women are, but they are not. The novel Lightyear is easy to read, but difficult to understand. Agua suggests that we can start with existentialism, and read Regina from this idea, and many problems will be solved. Regina is a woman, a woman in marriage. Redna also has an identity, that is, a person. People who are divorced from marriage, divorced from society and not joking with society, and cherish the essence of life. She is a great person. Greatness is because in real life, it is difficult for us to treat life and life coldly and enthusiastically. In the conventional concept, people always depend on and are closely connected with society. Here, you can't see the necessity of social existence. Regina is like a fish. It's not that it needs water, but that water nurtures it, which shows the value of water. This character created by James Salter subverts my understanding of women. I haven't seen any writer give women this brand-new role for the time being. I call it post-modernism, Agua laughs at me for labeling, and Kong Yalei says it is a kind of heroism combining individual and divinity. ) Either way, Agua and I agree that we are outsiders in Camus' works. This novel broadens my understanding of women. I think that women are inferior to men in nature, so I can't help but put women in a subordinate position in the process of investigation and thinking. I don't see it from Rydena. Both men and women are subordinate to the light of nature and are natural creatures. Men can be free from society. Women don't need to get rid of men before they leave society. What binds us is not the bondage itself, but the mind.