In fact, I think that although the average aesthetic level of the audience is not high on the one hand, the main reason for junk movies is the separation between the filmmakers and the audience, which leads to the fact that in the process of film creation, it is not for what the audience wants to see, but generally for the personal expression of the producers, even for the capital. That is to say, when creating movies, only the preferences of the producers and the capital will be considered, and the audience's voice will be ignored.

If it is because the audience's aesthetics are not high, more filmmakers should enhance their aesthetics, but this is not the case. Take Jiang Wen's movies as an example. If he conforms to a popular theme and shows his personal style, he will be easily accepted by the audience. However, some of his films are not so easy to understand, and the outstanding personal color will not be easily accepted by the audience, so the box office will naturally not be too high.

There is also a kind of movie that often appears in the film market at present, which can be said to be pure bad movies. Only investors are satisfied with such films. If the box office of such films is not high, but the net profit is still considerable, then many filmmakers choose to make bad films, which forms a vicious circle.

If China can give more consideration to the audience's aesthetics and wishes in the process of film production, it may be possible to reduce the production of junk movies. This can only rely on the unremitting efforts of the majority of filmmakers, on the one hand to enhance the audience's aesthetic, on the other hand to change their own style. If you have the capital to make a movie too long, it may go against the original intention of many producers and produce some junk movies.