Current location - Quotes Website - Excellent quotations - How should we treat the sentence "seeing is believing"?
How should we treat the sentence "seeing is believing"?
Introduction:

True or false, true or false, right or wrong, be a wise man and don't be deceived by the world.

/0dd 79 12397 DDA 1448d 23 187 bb 9 b 7d 0 a 20 df 486d 4? X-BCE-process = image/resize, m _ lfit, w _ 450, h _ 600, limit _ 1/quality, q _ 85 Disciple asked the Buddha, "I can't even see the Elysium you said. How can I believe it?" The Buddha took his disciple to a dark room and told him, "There is a hammer in the corner." Disciples, whether they stare big or narrow their eyes or can't see their fingers, have to say that I can't see them. The Buddha lit the candle and there was a hammer in the corner. What you can't see doesn't exist?

Seeing is believing, but hearing is not. I don't know how many people have been influenced by this famous saying, but is this sentence really correct?

/0df 43 1 adcbef 7609632 1 ed 5625 DD a3 cc 7 DD 99 ed 4? X-BCE-process = image/resize, m _ lfit, w _ 450, h _ 600, limit _ 1/quality, q _ 85 First of all, let's analyze, what the ear hears is false, so must it be unbelievable? Everyone speaks from the heart, and the speed and tone of a person's speech can often tell whether he is lying. Careful people can hear that sometimes the next sentence can't keep up with what the liar dictated, and it's even irrelevant, and the preface doesn't follow the rest. Telling a lie needs to make up more lies to make up for the vacancy, and there will be loopholes in the story, unless he is an old fox with superb acting skills.

/FD 039245d 688d 43 f 04 dfe 53 b 76 1ed 2 1 b0ff 43 b 80? X-BCE-process = image/resize, m _ lfit, w _ 450, h _ 600, limit _ 1/quality, q _ 85, seeing is believing, and it is also problematic, just like a disciple can't see a hammer in the dark. Invisible doesn't mean it doesn't exist. There are many smoke screens in real life, playing more and more advanced, and urban routines are not generally deep. In order to achieve a certain goal, it is difficult for you to see a lot of real things. If nothing else, as everyone often jokes, how many beautiful women you see coming and going in the street are all natural and have not been processed or transformed? There are also some social networking platforms online. How much is true? Everyone knows each other through a mobile phone screen. You never know whether the person you are chatting with is male or female, and you can't guess what their purpose is. You lied to me, and I lied to you.

/f 7246 b 600 c 338744 140 15 ab 55 a 0 FD 9 f 9d 62 aa 037? X-BCE-process = image/resize, m _ lfit, w _ 450, h _ 600, limit _ 1/quality, q _ 85 If a person can see through and judge accurately, he can control things without being controlled by them. He has a good eye for people, never dazzled, and can distinguish between black and white. The world is often different from appearances, and the ignorant only see appearances; Faking is actually superficial, but fools flock to it. To become a master of wisdom, we must first overcome our own prejudice. Duke Jing of Jin copied Zhao's loyalty because of his treacherous words, and staged the eternal tragedy "Zhao's orphan"; Cao Cao listened to the rumor that Jiang Gan killed Cai Mao and Zhang Yun by mistake, and fell into a series of stratagems, and finally defeated Chibi. Tragedies caused by misinformation abound in history. Isn't it enough for us to learn a lesson?

Listening is not necessarily false, seeing is not necessarily true, looking in all directions, listening in all directions, observing and analyzing things in many ways. Truth and falsehood, falsehood and truth, right and wrong are all tortuous. We should learn to treat people and things dialectically to analyze problems, and never be blinded by the world.