From Guo Moruo's reading club: "Reading is not in the middle of the night and five drums, but I am afraid of ten cold."
If you want to succeed, you must persevere, never be diligent and slack, and fish for three days and dry the net for two days. If a person insists on reading and studying every day, his endurance and perseverance will increase invisibly.
The reality is cruel enough, and many times we need to be more persistent and persevering than others. Only in this way can we go further. Isn't reading the only way for us ordinary people to shorten the distance with others? The world gallops in the dust with its rhythm. All we can do is to take dreams as horses, feed on books and follow closely. If you don't want to be a poor man abandoned by the world, then step up your study!
Extended data
Guo Moruo commented.
As early as the May 4th Movement, he praised the people's revolution, socialism and communism with his poems full of revolutionary passion, and created a poetic style, thus becoming the founder of China's new poetry movement. The historical plays he created are powerful weapons to educate the people and attack the enemy. (Deng Xiaoping Review)
If he said ten sentences and only three were right, those seven wrong sentences can inspire people to study dialectics. If he said three right sentences, he can save a lot of grievances for contemporary and future people. (Wen Yiduo comments)
Guo Moruo and Zhou Enlai took a group photo. Guo Moruo is a cultural giant in the history of China in the 20th century. After the May 4th Movement, few people have made achievements in many aspects like Guo Moruo, and they can be described as wizards.
Guo Moruo has made brilliant and great achievements in several academic fields, especially in the history of China's poetry, the ancient history of China and the study of ancient Chinese characters. In recent years, especially in recent years, some criticisms of Guo Moruo are in line with the facts and some are distorted. The emergence of criticism and new ideas is the expression of social progress.
Generally speaking, it will promote academic progress and cultural development. Normal academic environment should have criticism and counter-criticism. However, in the reflection on Guo Moruo, some articles and scholars adopted a frivolous attitude, which is incorrect. We should pay attention to studying him with a scientific attitude. (China Science Network Review)
Guo Moruo is an unavoidable and indelible figure in the history of Chinese historiography in the 20th century. His lofty academic status is determined by his outstanding contributions. Scholars with high attainments in history, archaeology, ancient philology, antiquities, literature, art and so on. There were few scholars of China history in the 20th century, and even fewer before the 20th century.
The "reflection" on Guo Moruo actually involves how to understand the cultural development path of China in the 20th century, that is, what is the outstanding cultural heritage in the 20th century and what is the cultural development direction of China in the 2nd/kloc-0th century. The evaluation of Guo Moruo should be the same as that of any historical figure, and adhere to scientific theory and methodology.
Adhering to the principle of "knowing people and discussing the world" cannot be divorced from certain historical conditions, but should focus on revealing the essence and mainstream. If the positions of the mainstream and tributaries are reversed, the tributaries are infinitely exaggerated, and even vilified and abused, it will deviate from the principles and methods that should be used to evaluate historical figures; This is the same as the practice of infinitely touting a historical figure, which is not desirable. (Qu Review)
Mr. Guo Moruo is not only brilliant, but also has a profound knowledge of Chinese studies. He did make a unique contribution to the study of Oracle Bone Inscriptions and Jin Wen. In other words, there are still many viewpoints in China Ancient Social Research, Ten Criticism Books and Bronze Age. Although he also abides by "what one says", it is different from applying a formula.
I once severely criticized him for copying other people's research results and did not admit it frankly, which made him a taboo in academic research. However, I didn't kill him. But as far as modern academic norms are concerned, his bravado makes him more energetic, while the discipline of history is far from enough.
This is mainly because he is different from Chen Er (referring to Chen Yuan and Chen Yinque) and Lv Simian. His ambition is not academic, but he has different arms. Successful scholars can refer to his above three books, and beginners should not start with such works. (Yu Yingshi Review)