1, citing events, concise-material deduction is the first point.
News events must be quoted at the beginning of current affairs commentary, which is the foundation and argument of writing. It is equivalent to quoting materials in material composition. In material composition, citation refers to citing material as a topic, revealing arguments or asking questions, which belongs to the "introduction" part. It is best to start from the need to put forward an argument, grasp the main idea of the material and quote it accurately in concise language.
Generally speaking, different materials have different citation methods: narrative materials with more words should be summarized, incisive famous sayings and aphorisms should be repeated, words with profound meanings and rich connotations should be expounded, and cartoon materials should briefly introduce and explain pictures. For commentary, the quoted events should have a source and a source.
The introduction is usually written in the first paragraph, asking for an appropriate central argument from the event.
What materials did you draw the central argument from? We can consider from the following aspects: famous sayings, epigrams, epigrams, proverbs, even proverbs and philosophical words.
2. Analyze the causes and root causes-the best way to discuss materials.
Cause analysis, also known as causal analysis. This analysis is based on causality, linking arguments with arguments. Specifically, it is to explore the root cause, discover the essence and deepen the content of the behavior and result in the case along the "why" thinking.
For example, in order to prove the argument that "one should be determined", tell a story like this: It is said that Newton was not clever when he was young. Once, his father asked him to make a hole in the door to make it easier for big cats and kittens to go out, but he made two big holes, saying it was because there were two small animals. Nevertheless, in the process of Newton's determination to explore the mysteries of science, he achieved fruitful results because of his efforts. Then use causal analysis: if a person sets his mind, it is like pressing an engine on a machine, he will have inexhaustible energy. It is because of this "inexhaustible power" that Newton made great achievements and became a famous scientist.
This is precisely after citing examples, along the thinking of why Newton became a scientist, to explore its roots, thus proving the argument that "people should be determined."
This analysis method often uses "what is the reason?" At first ... "leads to exploring and analyzing things.
The advantage of causality analysis is that it can discuss the material closely and never deviate from the meaning of the problem, which also enhances the speculative nature of the material composition.
3. Explore the essence with philosophical speculation and expand the discussion space.
Fundamentally speaking, the main body of argumentative writing is to answer a "why" question. When we demonstrate an argument, we should start thinking and ask "why" more, that is, take the central argument as a conclusion to trace the conditions and reasons for this conclusion, or go deep into the essence through the phenomenon, or reveal the reasons for the problem, thus forming a sub-argument.
Because causality is the universal connection between all things and phenomena, the method of "tracing back to the source and exploring the reasons" is also widely used in argumentative writing.
4, contact with reality, clear-cut-from small to big, widely involved.
(1) The position of the contact reality part in the full text:
The part that connects with reality is often in the middle or the second half of the article; It can also be used in the whole article.
Part of it is related to reality and appears in the middle or the second half of the article.
(2) The whole article is connected with reality, and it can be organized by multiple current events, or it can be run through the whole article by one current event.
③ Types of contact with reality: There are generally two ways, namely "case" and "general case".
"Case" is a specific case, that is, closely following the central point of view, selecting a typical case and describing it in detail. Of course, this kind of specific narrative is relative to the general example, and it can't be as detailed as writing a narrative, just make things clear, because argumentative writing is mainly about discussion.
"Generalization" is a common social phenomenon, which abandons specific factors such as people, time and place, and summarizes a kind of "general" things.
(4) The general idea of connecting with reality:
It is generally divided into three small steps: standing, swinging and analyzing. Standing is to build a small argument at this level. If there is no argument, you can start directly from the facts; Placing is putting facts; Analysis is to analyze the phenomenon and make it stick to the argument. These three small steps are actually three parts: beginning, unfolding and ending. (Students can combine the classic paragraph patterns of reciting, especially the hypothesis, causality and meaning analysis we talked about in the "analysis" section)
5. Propose a method to solve the problem-look at the real works by hypothesis analysis.
That is to say, what will happen if the conditions for achieving a certain result do not exist in the material? At the same time, it can be compared with the original results, and the argument can be proved by comparison.
Note: If the given example is positive, then hypothetical analysis should be made from the opposite side; If the given example is negative, then we should assume that the analysis is positive.
Example: "There are no identical eggs in the world. Draw one and then another, and the shape will be different. Even if you look at the same egg from different angles, its shape is very different. Only by practicing the basic skills of drawing eggs can we draw better pictures. " Teacher Da Vinci's earnest teaching tells a truth: basic skills training is very important. Because Leonardo da Vinci cultivated a solid painting foundation from the teacher's stage, he later became an outstanding painter in the European Renaissance.
Imagine that he doesn't have a solid basic painting skills, he can't observe the nuances of the same object from different angles, he can't find that the object of creation changes with the changes of light and shade, and he can't realize that "there are no identical eggs in the world". Can he create the Mona Lisa, an oil painting that is considered unique in the world? That "mysterious smile" can never be erased by a trustworthy hand. No matter what you do, you should start from laying the foundation. As the saying goes, high-rise buildings rise from the ground, which is also the profound educational significance of Leonardo da Vinci's story of painting eggs.
Hypothetical analysis can use the questions of "question" and "imagination", pay attention to the material from multiple angles, and closely link with the central argument, so that the analysis can be more thorough.
Hypothesis analysis method is specially designed for solving material composition, and it is especially favored by reviewers in the writing process.