Current location - Quotes Website - Excellent quotations - The sentence that can prove Mozi's victory in the debate in "Public Losing" is the proof method he used.
The sentence that can prove Mozi's victory in the debate in "Public Losing" is the proof method he used.
The last sentence: The king of Chu said: OK, I invite you to attack the Song Dynasty.

The author is also good at inferring by analogy and reasoning at different levels. Mozi didn't say Chen Qi directly when he saw the loser and the king of Chu, but made a metaphor first, and then made logical reasoning, which greatly enhanced his persuasiveness and received good artistic effect. What is particularly prominent is the author's use of metaphor. For example, after Mozi saw the loser, the loser asked him what he thought. He didn't directly answer his purpose, but said, "Those who insult our minister in the north are willing to kill them by borrowing their children." He made the problem very serious, in order to attract the attention of the other party to this matter at once and force the other party to express their attitude and views on this matter immediately, even if the other party said what he wanted him to say. However, the public failure to bid just didn't say anything, just expressed unhappiness. Needless to say, the public loss did not achieve the expected purpose. So I had to add fuel to the fire, "please give me ten gold." This means bribing him to kill people. Now the loser can't hold his breath and blurts out, "I'm determined not to kill anyone." Mozi made him unhappy and then angered him, just to get him to say this sentence and then refute it. Mozi met the king of Chu, which is another story. From the beginning, I said "someone came today" and so on. He doesn't use hypothetical words such as "if" and "if", as if telling a real thing, so that the other party won't have an illusion and can listen, and then let the other party say what he wants him to say. Mozi used three metaphors in succession, and then asked the king of Chu, "Why is this a person?" The king of Chu replied happily, "There must be theft." Since the answer is that everyone is happy, there is no need to use goad's method to force further questions. But readers can imagine that if the king of Chu is hesitant like a loser, Mozi will use other methods to get him to say what he wants him to say. It can be seen that Mozi adopted different methods according to the performance of different objects. In short, let them talk and tell them what they want them to say. Don't talk, no; If you say it, you won't stop until you reach your goal. As long as they speak, things will be easy. We can catch them and attack them with spears. Mozi used this method to lure the fish to the bait and strike first. From beginning to end, Mozi took the initiative to make the other side completely passive. The reason why the article is logical and persuasive is inseparable from this reasoning method.