Evaluation runs through every aspect of our teaching. Many things are actually the function of teacher evaluation, which is much more than what we call exam papers. We should make full use of the weapon of evaluation in our exams and also play a motivating role in various daily teaching links, making our students more confident and interested in doing a good job in our learning and improving their learning ability.
So how do teachers give full play to the motivational function of classroom teaching evaluation and promote the improvement of students' literacy?
1. The timing of evaluation should be appropriate?
The evaluation should not be excessive. Early on, when some teachers listen to students' speeches, they often give encouragement and praise before students have finished speaking. This will greatly limit students' thinking development space and make students feel that they have unfinished business. Teachers should let students finish speaking before making an evaluation, which not only gives students room to express themselves freely, but also helps teachers make pertinent evaluations. Even if a student answers some questions wrongly, the teacher will not be too busy to deny it immediately and tell the truth. Instead, he can look at the whole class with expectant eyes, encourage other students to express their own opinions, start arguments with different opinions, and enrich students' thinking. Develop in debate, understanding deepens in debate, problems are solved in debate, and enthusiasm for learning is enhanced in debate. ?
2. The content of evaluation must be comprehensive?
Emotion, will, interest, etc. run through the entire process of students' learning and directly affect students' mastery of knowledge and intellectual development. Classroom teaching evaluation should focus on all aspects of student development, such as positive learning attitude, innovative spirit, ability to analyze and solve problems, and correct outlook on life, values, etc. Maybe the student's answer is not accurate enough, but his way of thinking is correct; maybe the student's answer is wrong, but his learning attitude is positive; maybe the student's statement is absurd, but his innovative spirit is commendable. Therefore, classroom teaching evaluation must be comprehensive and careful, fully discover students’ shining points and give full recognition. ?
3. The language of evaluation must be artistic?
1. The language of evaluation must be accurate. Hypocrisy, insincerity, and exaggeration are actually one of the main problems in language evaluation in classroom teaching. Regardless of whether the student is right or not, "praise him (her), bang, bang, bang", a unified pattern. This kind of insincere evaluation will not only have no motivating effect, but will lead to many negative effects. . ”?
2. The evaluation language must be clever. Various situations often occur in the classroom, and the teacher’s evaluation language must be adaptable and flexible, and cannot simply use “yes” or “no” , "right" or "wrong" to evaluate.
3. The language of evaluation must be contagious. "The same "good" can be said as plainly as water, making people feel reluctant to cope, or it can be said with passion, making people feel your heartfelt appreciation. Teacher's evaluation has an impact on students' emotions and emotions Emotions and emotions are intrinsic motivational forces that directly affect students' learning. Therefore, teachers' evaluation should focus on emotional investment and use motivational language full of sincerity to give praise enthusiastically.
4. , Evaluation methods should be diverse?
Classroom teaching evaluation can adopt methods such as teacher evaluation, student self-evaluation, and peer evaluation.
Teacher evaluation should use encouraging language or descriptive language. The language describes students' performance, knowledge mastery and ability level in classroom teaching activities, focusing on evaluating students' performance in developmental areas. Teachers' evaluation should use different evaluation methods based on different teaching objects. For poor students, evaluation should focus on encouragement. For students with good basic skills, evaluation should focus on motivation. A casual look of approval or a word of appreciation from the teacher will make students excited and motivate them to be more motivated. It promotes the development of students' intelligence and emotional sublimation, and plays a very good motivating role.
Student self-evaluation is to guide students to conduct self-evaluation of their various performances in classroom teaching according to learning goals and requirements. Evaluation. ?
Students can evaluate each other at the same table, in groups, and in the whole class to promote everyone’s participation, mobilize learning enthusiasm, and improve learning efficiency.
In classroom teaching, the use of these evaluation methods is often not isolated or single. It must be flexibly used and organically combined according to the actual needs of classroom teaching, giving full play to the advantages and specialties of various evaluation methods, so that evaluation can truly motivate students.
Homework evaluation strategy?
1. Star rating
When evaluating students' homework, we use "star rating" "Evaluation" method. Students will be evaluated by star rating based on their answers to homework assignments: students with high accuracy in their assignments and careful writing will get three stars; students with high accuracy in their assignments but not careful writing will only get two stars or one star☆ In order to encourage poor students and cultivate top students, we also stipulate that those who make mistakes in their homework but can correct them in time can also get a ☆. When the student gets thirty ☆s, he will be praised in the class and given a ☆. Good news. In order to get one more star, students pay special attention to their homework. They always check their homework repeatedly and correct it in time if they find mistakes. Over time, they feel very regretful. Ability has been greatly improved. At the same time, students' enthusiasm and initiative in learning have been greatly mobilized.
2. Points evaluation
Establish a score bank in the class, allowing students to deposit corresponding scores in the score bank according to the stars they receive after each assignment. For example, 2 points are given for all correct answers, and 2 points are added for clear and correct handwriting. Scores are tallied once a week, and the team leader deposits the scores of each team member into the score bank. Evaluations are conducted every four weeks, and the scores are calculated in the class. The top twenty students will receive a certain amount of "interest" (extra points), and at the end of the semester, the "Best Savers" will be selected. This method of homework evaluation mobilizes students' enthusiasm very well, and it is also more comprehensive and complete than previous evaluation methods.
3. Comments and evaluations
Comments are a way of marking homework, which allows students to more clearly understand the strengths and weaknesses of their homework, and can also strengthen communication between teachers and students. , Promote the harmonious and unified progress of students in all aspects. When evaluating assignments, we use comments skillfully based on students' completion of assignments. Through verbal stimulation, we can touch students' hearts and activate their emotions, so that their souls can be stretched in the appreciation of teachers, making them become more and more confident and outstanding. In the process of correcting homework, I often use some famous aphorisms or colloquial language as comments. Good comments are a clarion call, inspiring students to move forward.
We can use some comforting language to treat students who lack self-consciousness in learning: "There are roads in the mountains of books, hard work is the path, and there are no cliffs in the sea of ??learning, and there are no cliffs in the boat." When dealing with students with outstanding academic performance, you can use some bold words to inspire them to have the courage to move towards higher goals: "You are like an eagle with spread wings, you will have a vast sky", "Work hard, your tomorrow will be better ", "The mountain is high and the peak is the peak", etc. For students who are content with the status quo in their studies, I will write a sentence: "Learning is like sailing against the current. If you don't advance, you will retreat." After reading these various comments, the students gained a lot of literary knowledge, increased their interest in learning Chinese, and more importantly, increased their courage to move forward.
(2) Establish multiple evaluation subjects
Homework is another way for teachers and students to communicate and interact. For a long time, teachers have been almost responsible for grading homework and assessing grades. In order to change the shortcomings of the traditional single evaluation subject of teachers and implement multi-subject evaluation, I emphasize two-way choice, communication and negotiation in the evaluation process of students' Chinese homework, and pay attention to the identification of evaluation results, that is, how to make the evaluation objects accept the evaluation results to the greatest extent Rather than the correctness of the evaluation results themselves; change the status quo of a single evaluation subject and make evaluation an interactive activity in which teachers, managers, students, and parents actively participate.
1. Student-student interaction
Students are the main body of learning and the masters of learning. Every student is a vivid picture. Rabindranath Tagore said: "It is not the blow of the mallet, but the singing and dancing of the water, that makes the pebbles perfect." In homework evaluation, teachers should put students' development first, let students actively participate in the evaluation of homework, create opportunities for students to interact, and make the pebbles perfect. Leave the opportunity for evaluation to students and return the right to evaluate to students. The evaluation between students is more realistic than what the teacher said. Everyone evaluates each other, and their thoughts collide again and again, which arouses the desire to communicate. The "flow of ideas" cultivates the evaluation awareness among partners, and the students' self-confidence is also greatly enhanced. , better promote the improvement of students' overall quality. Of course, the evaluations among students can sometimes be too extreme. At this time, teachers must actively stand up and provide guidance to protect students' enthusiasm for learning. For some basic knowledge and simple exercises, teachers can divide students into groups according to "good, medium, and poor" and let the group leader lead other students to conduct mutual evaluation.
2. Teacher-student interaction
Teacher-student interaction can improve the relationship between teachers and students and shorten the distance between teachers and students. During the homework evaluation process, teachers select "problems" in the homework in a targeted manner, and conduct evaluations with classmates purposefully, allowing students to look at other excellent homework and then look at their own homework to find gaps. After the problem is clarified, teach them how to evaluate and let them evaluate alone. Sometimes, the teacher can also do homework with the students, and ask students to evaluate the students' common mistakes in their previous homework. Students are more motivated to evaluate the teacher's homework. At this time, the teacher should praise the teacher in a timely manner and take advantage of the situation to encourage them. They must dare to think, dare to speak, and dare to think. Mobilize students' enthusiasm for learning.
3. Home-school interaction
It is often said that "parents are their children's first teachers." Children are always more likely to get close to their parents. During the homework evaluation process, parents can appropriately participate in evaluating students' homework. Students are required to hand over their homework books to their parents, and students and parents are asked to write their suggestions and requirements for teachers in the homework books in a timely manner, so that teachers, students, and parents can interact and make the homework books a channel for interactive dialogue between teachers, students, and parents. , the most common topics are the teacher's "teaching" and the students' "learning". In this way, students no longer passively accept the teacher's evaluation, but actively conduct self-evaluation. Coupled with the participation of parents, students' learning enthusiasm is greatly improved. Students' learning attitude rises to a new level, and students' evaluation awareness be further improved.