In the era of mobile phones, don't neglect your family
I. Composition materials
(1) In recent years, the following two famous sayings have been circulated on the Internet:
(1) Lying smoking opium a hundred years ago, lying playing with mobile phones a hundred years later, the posture is strikingly similar.
(2) The furthest distance in the world is not between life and death, but when we are sitting together, you are playing with your mobile phone.
these two famous sayings are the most vivid portrayal of many people's lives at present.
(2) In October, 212, "Grandpa who broke the bowl" became synonymous with the family hurt by the mobile phone. At a family dinner, the elderly grandfather wanted to talk to his grandson and granddaughter many times, but all his grandchildren had a mobile phone in their hands, chatting, playing games and brushing Weibo. The old man who couldn't bear to be left out dropped a sentence, "Let's talk with your mobile phone" and broke the bowl and left.
second, the idea of inspiration
The composition material 1 consists of two famous sayings. The first sentence mainly describes that the attitude of people playing mobile phones in today's society is strikingly similar to that of people smoking opium 1 years ago. The second sentence mainly describes the relationship between people in today's society. Two people are sitting together while the other is playing mobile phones. Two famous sayings describe two life scenes, and both reveal the fact that in today's society, mobile phones close the window of people's hearts, making people's communication less and less, the relationship more and more alienated and the gap more and more widening. Faced with such a fact, what do you think and what do you feel? When reviewing the questions, you can grasp one of them and make a thorough analysis. For example, in the first sentence, smoking opium while lying down a hundred years ago once did great harm to the whole country and nation. Will it be the same after lying down and playing with mobile phones a hundred years later? You can make your own analysis. You can also use the comprehensive analysis method to analyze, synthesize and summarize the connotations of the two materials, and then summarize a more comprehensive point of view. For example, we can talk about the relationship between people, the influence of high-tech products on human life, the material enjoyment and spiritual enjoyment in life, the relationship between learning and entertainment, etc., as long as it comes from materials, it should be an appropriate angle.
As far as composition material 2 is concerned, an appropriate topic should have two core elements: "mobile phone" and "affection". What is the relationship between the two? After reading the materials carefully, we can easily find that mobile phones have changed people's communication methods and made family ties indifferent. From the element of mobile phone, we can abstract information such as technology, tools, modernization and modern civilization, while the element of affection involves information such as love and filial piety. Therefore, the composition idea can be developed around the relevant information of these two elements, but they can also have their own emphasis. If we focus on "mobile phones", we can talk about the alienation of science and technology on people's emotions, the negative impact of modern civilization on traditional filial piety, and people's recognition of things as their own, and ultimately serving things. If we focus on "affection", we can talk about the value and care of affection.
I need to remind you that in the process of writing, you should beware of the situation that "second intention" leads to digression or even digression. If some students may deduce "filial piety" from family ties and "traditional culture" from "filial piety", so they write a composition on the topic of "reflecting on traditional culture", it will go astray. Some students may interpret the children's lack of struggle spirit from their fascination with playing mobile phones, that is, they are wrong to grasp the part and ignore the overall information of the material. In fact, such deductive mistakes are often made by candidates, and the reason is the lack of effective thinking mode.