This time we will talk about some famous double-standard remarks about NBA in recent years. First, the spillover theory of various awards. One MVP is enough, and more is brushing. In contrast, there are fractional spillover theory and hit spillover theory. 24.99 points is enough, and more points are brush points. 44% hit rate is enough, and more is brushing. Second, whether the NBA era has progressed or regressed. Times have improved. The current players are better than the previous players, and they can make all the technical moves of the previous players and improve them. Times are going backwards. There is no antagonism in the current NBA game. Players will only soar three points, and strike while the iron is hot with a little strength.

Third, changing teams is disloyal. Whichever team you choose, you should play where you retired. Jabbar, James, Buckley, Olajuwon, Jordan, not a person, a city. If you change teams after being selected without playing, then this is not mandatory and will not have an impact. If you try to change teams but don't, it's not forced and won't affect you. Fourth, whether we should evaluate the private lives of players. The use of private life. The player has a role model, so the private life of the player's family affects our evaluation of him, whether it is a rumor or not. Private life is useless. Because we watch the ball, we watch the performance on the court. A player's private life does not affect our evaluation of him.

Fifth, there is no racial discrimination in NBA. As a multi-ethnic and multi-racial basketball club, NBA has always said that there is no racial discrimination in its own league. But because of a few racist remarks, Sterling, the former owner of the Clippers, lost the team. China player Yao Ming not only rarely gets a "star whistle" on the court, but also becomes the focus of the referee's concern. In addition, in the selection of some awards, coaches and journalists with voting rights prefer American players.

Sixth, the player's freedom of speech. I want to ask, is there so-called freedom of speech in the league? Since freedom of speech is emphasized, why can't players, coaches and team owners criticize referees when facing reporters? Then why can't the team management make public comments to attract rookies and free agents to join? Wait a minute. problem Since there was freedom of speech at that time, why were there so many regulations restricting speech? Criticizing referees was as light as fines or bans, and evaluating players would face fines and insulting fans, and players would face fines or bans? The NBA is really a double-standard stadium.