1. Why can't we live a good life after listening to so many truths?

2. An idealist? Ideal is full, reality is skinny?

3. Closed door vs pragmatism?

Consider the first question first:

In high school, we all know the idiom "Heaven rewards diligence", which is very simple to understand. People who work hard will always gain more.

There are many famous sayings with the same essence and different forms in this sentence:

Wisdom comes from diligence, and genius lies in accumulation.

I believe many people have heard countless famous aphorisms describing that we should be diligent, but why are there still most people who can't be diligent?

Here is a loophole:

What is the relationship between knowledge and action?

When we know that heaven rewards diligence, we think that we know that it is not enough. The knower begins to do what he knows, and the walker knows what he can do. The so-called unity of knowing and doing is an inseparable and unified whole. Explain it from the viewpoint of yin and yang: knowledge is a virtual thing, not the original form of things. All human knowledge is summed up from past experience. The experience can't be exactly the same, and most of the knowledge needs to be adjusted in different scenarios. The only truth that is really concise and powerful needs a lot of practice to understand. Just like why we only have a few formulas in high school, most people can remember them, but there is a big gap in test scores, and some of them are simply practicing.

Virtual things must be pinned on the real level to have value and significance. All positivism that doesn't tell you the scope of application is hooliganism. So knowing is only the first step, knowing a piece of knowledge. If you think this knowledge is correct and you haven't thought of it yet, you should practice it in your life. On the other hand, if you don't practice this knowledge, what you hear is meaningless.

So 99% of us are wrong about knowledge. Knowing doesn't mean you can do it. (know+practice)? N= unity of knowledge and action.

In the bottom logic of your brain, pay attention to the bottom logic I said, which is rooted in your subconscious. You need to be deeply rooted in the idea of the unity of knowing and doing, and practice it in your life from today.

Knowledge and practice cannot be separated. If you learn a knowledge that does not use scenes, then this knowledge can be thrown into the recycling bin as garbage.

The second question:

Why do we think more than we do?

I am a very special person, thinking jump, not limited to reality.

The summer after the college entrance examination, I was thinking about the idea of starting a business after graduating from college. I don't remember what I thought at that time, but I remember that I spent a lot of time thinking about how to start a business and how to start a business, and then I learned about the college student pioneer park. At that time, I really believed that I would do well in college. Later, school started. In fact, I didn't start a business in college life. I worked as a tutor, then joined the school's double-creation organization and participated in various social practices. Later, I was fortunate to be the city leader of a social platform, and now I am participating in the creation of social platforms.

In fact, my development today is a road that I have never thought of before, because every opportunity given to you by reality is accidental, and of course there is inevitability in the accident. Before that, many ideas were actually utopianism. So I was thinking, is this our life? Maybe some people are very practical and do one thing for ten years. As long as they persist, they are likely to blossom and bear fruit, but they may never think about their future development. The greatest suffering of idealists lies in the huge gap between reality and ideal.

The second defeat of the Red Army against encirclement and suppression was left-leaning dogmatism represented by Wang Ming. He mechanically applied the knowledge he learned in Russia to the realistic revolutionary movement, ignoring the actual situation, surpassing the development situation at that time, and had the characteristics of utopianism, which eventually led to the failure of the fifth anti-"encirclement and suppression". The red army was forced to make a long March and lost a lot of troops.

We must learn to think, but our thinking must be conditional, that is, our thinking must be based on reality, do a good job in the present and think about the future in the present. All thinking should have basis, not fantasy. In short, thinking without practice is empty talk and fantasy.

The meaning of fantasy is meaningless. We should look up at the stars and keep our feet on the ground. Imagination needs to be combined with practice to have real meaning. Just as we want to achieve something, we need to set a goal, but if we just set a goal and don't push it forward, what's the point of setting this goal? When you set a goal and determine the implementation path, we often encounter a difficulty that is difficult for us to implement, either because we are unfamiliar or because the situation is complicated. Therefore, implementation is not a simple matter, and implementation requires very strong adaptability and determination. However, execution is an indispensable link between theory and practice. No matter how good the theory is, it lacks practice. This theory is a castle in the air, and only the theory proved in the event is the truth. As the saying goes, practice is the only criterion for testing truth.

The world immersed in imagination is an illusory world, and we need to think, but more importantly, we need to think based on reality, from perceptual cognition to rational cognition to correction. Although free thinking is very important, thinking and cognition based on reality and the present can really help us go better.

The third question: retreat? Vs pragmatic?

My role is a retired person. The advantage of retreat is that your mind is extremely open, and there is nothing unexpected.

The disadvantage of retreat is that it pays too much attention to practical things and is easy to be divorced from reality.

Virtual and real things are important, but I am practical.

I don't like to use words as examples, because I don't pay enough attention to life and think deeply, and I don't care much about my past real life.

But I like reasoning very much for many reasons, but if it's just reasoning, many things are very, very empty and abstract.

The same is true of learning. I like to understand the theory, but I am not interested in doing the problem, or even very lacking.

This is all because of the lack of a deep understanding of the virtual and the real, which leads to the imbalance in handling things.

Combination of reality and reality+unity of knowledge and action+dialectical materialism. For me, it is something that needs to be deeply rooted in my underlying logic and resolutely practiced.

From a retired person to a very pragmatic person.

In life, all ideas should be put into practice. If there is no possibility of practice, don't think about it.

Don't give up during the practice. Giving up means that you have nothing to do, which means wasting everything you know and do.