How to understand success or failure
There are too many philosophies about success or failure. However, how to understand success and failure?
Psychologically speaking, the difference between success and failure is only a different grasp of the current situation, which shows that success or failure is mainly a subjective mentality. Help understand the success or failure statement, you won't fail unless you stop trying; Only when you are defeated by yourself will you be defeated by others.
Failure will not come unless you give up.
Success is often the reason for the next failure. On the contrary, any failure may be the cause of the next great success because of wisdom and hard work.
For those who are confident and don't mind temporary failure, there is no such thing as failure. There is no such thing as failure for those who are strong-willed.
Failure may be a victory in disguise, and the lowest tide is the beginning of the climax.
Failure is a lesson and may be the first step to improve the situation.
Edison invented the electric light. After thousands of failures, he never got discouraged and finally invented the electric light.
Wellington failed, but not discouraged, and rallied to defeat Napoleon. (Failure is unknown) 1. Failure is the mother of success.
Success or failure is not eternal, but can be transformed.
Don't be arrogant if you win, and don't lose.
Failure is often the darkness before dawn, followed by the sunrise of success. -hodges Historical Facts/kloc-In the 4th century, the English army invaded Scotland, and King Bruce led the people to rise up and resist, but they organized six counter-attacks in succession and failed one after another. The Scottish army was beaten out of the water, and the king fled into a cave in frustration and noticed a spider weaving a web in the cave. Although the first six times were unsuccessful, the spider did not give up, but started the seventh attempt and finally succeeded. Encouraged, Bruce was determined to unite and lead the people to fight back against the invaders again. Under his leadership, Scotland finally defeated the invading enemy after many tenacious battles.
The following is the debate material about the hero of success or failure. Maybe you can find the answer from it. Thank you, Chairman, distinguished judges, teachers, classmates and other debaters. Hello!
Cross-century historical torrent, see the heroes of heaven and earth, see the ebb and flow of human beings, and taste the clouds in the sky. There are no heroes in the world. Ask the boundless earth, who is in charge of ups and downs? Alone in the tall building, we heard the grand cry of history and the future: judge people with lofty ideals with lofty sentiments, and judge heroes with success or failure!
If the drum doesn't ring, it's not clear whether it's reasonable or not. Throughout the whole debate, in the opening statement, we first used Marxist materialist dialectics to explain the correctness and scientificity of the hero's success or failure theory from two theoretical heights: the whole part and the primary and secondary aspects of contradictions. Then our second debate expounded our position more fully, comprehensively and objectively from the factual level. In the stage of attack and defense and free debate, we further consulted the opposing defense friends on the overall part, professionalism, measurement standards and other issues, and in the process, the opposing defense friends also had many flaws, which I will point out one by one below.
First, the opponent's debater separated the relationship between the whole and the part. When they see a person fail, they say that he has failed, but they have not seen his numerous previous successes and his great personality and spiritual quality. No need to look at the problem from the perspective of connection, no wonder we can't draw a scientific conclusion.
Second, the demeaning effect of the opponent's personality. Another debater told us that career success is success, but no amount of great personality success and spiritual achievement is success, but a spiritual quality that transcends success or failure. Is this intended to narrow the scope of the concept of success or failure?
Third, the opponent debater denied that he was a hero by success or failure, but he couldn't come up with his own standard of hero, and didn't make it an unsolved mystery in this debate. Even if the other debater goes through fire and water, it is difficult to appease the angry hearts of heroes!
Let me sum up our views further.
The reason why heroes are definitely judged by success or failure is because we can judge and evaluate heroes from the perspective of materialism and dialectics, thus forming an objective and fair standard for judging heroes. Whether it is Jin Goma Iron, swallowing Wan Li like a tiger, or dreaming of winning in a row, drunk watching the sword; Whether you can spend nine days on the moon, or you can go to the five oceans to catch turtles; Whether it is a miserable life or a fresh heart, these heroes have left a glorious historical chapter with their amazing career, successful spiritual achievements and successful great personality.
The reason why we agree to talk about heroes by success or failure is because we have a scientific understanding of success or failure. Success is not only the success of the cause, but also the realization of the goal; Success includes spiritual and personality success. This noble spirit and great personality of a hero, as well as his inspiration and influence on others and future generations, are indispensable and important manifestations of a hero.
The reason why we advocate success or failure as a hero is because this view advocates a positive value orientation. Recalling the past, Dajiangdong went to the waves to wash away all the heroes of the ages; Look at today, the sun rises, and all China people are heroes. Heroes don't ask the source, what kind of hero would you rather have? We advocate that everyone can pursue Excellence, success, national rejuvenation, human progress, dare to be the first and dare to challenge. This spirit and this value orientation are the spiritual torch to lead the progress of the human nation.
Only the scientific concept of success or failure can lead to the scientific theory of heroism, and only from the standpoint of the overwhelming majority of the people can we make correct value judgments and value choices and form an objective and fair standard for judging heroes.
Looking for him in the crowd, I suddenly looked back. Success or failure depends on it. On heroes, heroes are in the lamp! Material 2: the debate about whether heroes are desirable or not! (The 6th International Debate Competition)
Wu Tian (positive statement): In ancient times, there were heroes who talked about success or failure. In Li Bai's poem, he said, "The king of Qin swept across the Six Rivers, and the tiger was powerful." However, the Warring States Policy of the Eastern Zhou Dynasty said: "A brave man is a true man.
Don't judge heroes by success or failure. "Visible theory of success or failure, since ancient times is a matter of opinion. However, the topic of the times should have the significance of the times. Today, heroes have long talked about heroes by success or failure.
It is not a method, a standard, but as a word, a value exists in our times.
First, the idea of success or failure as a hero has its own merits. Although the ancients argued endlessly about this, the reason why they argued endlessly for thousands of years was not to explain it from one side.
Is there anything to recommend it? We look at this sentence today, not from such a simple angle, but with a pragmatic attitude, taking its essence and discarding its dross, so as to adapt it to the needs of the times.
Second, the value of success or failure As a hero, its desirability lies in linking success with heroes. Heroes are not simple people, nor are they heroic badges.
Not even a cold tombstone. It represents a symbol of spirit, a national flag and an example for the people.
Thirdly, the desirability of a hero based on success or failure lies in its wide practical significance. Because as a value, it encourages the whole society to learn from heroes and pursue success.
Jiangge (opposing debate): The ancients also said that "the name is irregular and the words are not smooth". Only by clearly defining the concept can we have a meaningful debate. According to the authoritative modern Chinese dictionary
Explain that success or failure is relative to specific goals. A hero refers to a person who can arouse the lofty feelings of others with his outstanding talents and qualities. The so-called success or failure hero means that success is a hero and failure is also a hero.
He is not a hero when he is dead. We think this view is not desirable for two reasons. First, we can't talk about a plump and vivid hero with a comprehensive and rigid theory of success or failure, so this view is wrong in theory.
Wrong. Whether a gifted hero can achieve external success depends on objective factors such as weather, geographical location and human harmony. Second, the hero's view of success or failure is one-sided.
Greatly exaggerated the meaning of utility, so what will this utilitarian world look like? It's really hard to imagine
Zheng Zihao (positive debate): Let me first point out two mistakes made by other students. First, logically, "desirable" is desirable, but it does not mean plagiarism, and "undesirable" is on the other side.
It means not desirable. The other party must demonstrate this sentence, no matter from which angle or level, it is not worth learning and accepting. Second, the other side takes the hero of success or failure as a concrete method and applies it to reality.
In the practice of life, but please don't forget that what we are going to do today is value judgment, not fact judgment.
The reason why we advocate the hero of success or failure is based on this kind of value, which has its desirability at three levels: individual, country and even society. First of all, at the personal level, the desirability of this value.
He advocates success and encourages people to pursue it. Second, the desirability of this value is also reflected in its role in promoting the development of the country. From individuals to countries, they all pursue the same truth of advocating success.
The desirability of this value at the social level lies in its ability to shape and create social values that encourage the pursuit of success and become the value orientation of social trends and the guide of social behavior.
Direction.
Ding Yuan (against the two debates): From the first debate to the second debate, the other side told us that their views today are only to prove that it is advisable to judge heroes by success or failure.
In fact, the biggest shortcoming of heroes in terms of success or failure is that they can't distinguish heroes.
First, from the perspective of success, if success is a hero, we can draw the conclusion that Hitler was a hero at the beginning of World War II, and it was difficult to create the Third Reich with his iron hoof and sweep across Europe.
Do you agree that he is a hero?
Secondly, in terms of failure, if failure is not a hero, then neither Jing Ke nor Bruno are heroes, but are they really not heroes?
Thirdly, success or failure, as a relative concept, always exists in certain competition, and the success of one competitor means the failure of another. So we can draw a third conclusion,
The result of any game is a hero and a bear. According to other students' views, judging heroes by success or failure, the result can only be that fake heroes are popular and real heroes are declining.
Fu Xin (positive three debates): I explain the value desirability of heroes based on success or failure from three aspects.
First, from the perspective of values, the meaning of success has been expanded. Because at this time, success also includes the value orientation of pursuing success, which is not simplification.
It is not only the realization of personal goals, but also the positive significance to society.
Second, advocating heroic values based on success or failure can break the old and establish the new, and evaluate people with a more fair and objective concept. On heroes by success or failure, this value advocates a more objective,
The concept of justice. We say that heroes are not afraid of humble origins. What do you look at without looking at your origins? Look at success and pursue the value orientation of success. Traditionally, some people will never be heroes, but all they need is.
Pursuing success, he is the hero that our times need.
Thirdly, the desirability of success or failure value as a hero is also reflected in its special significance to losers. Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong said: "Our society should give losers a chance to succeed again."
I want to ask everyone here who hasn't tasted failure. But because of this, do we give up the pursuit of success? The value of pursuing success is to let us not spit out the losers, but to encourage them.
Encourage him to continue to pursue success.
Lei Yu (three opposing arguments): First, let's look at another student's logic. Another student said that they only need to make a little contribution today, which means that they are desirable, and we have not paid more.
This place is not unsatisfactory. Is this called "only state officials can set fires, and people are not allowed to light lamps"? If another student must ask us today, is there any merit? I said yes, where is it?
Are you online? This can make everyone realize how harmful heroes are in terms of success or failure.
Let's see how other students demonstrate. Other students have two arguments. First of all, if you don't succeed, you don't succeed, so you should judge a hero by success or failure. Let's think, if the hero
If you don't eat, the hero will become a ghost hero. Then can we judge heroes by their appetite and see who eats more? Another classmate also told everyone to pursue success and encourage success. but
However, does encouraging and pursuing success mean judging heroes by success or failure?
In fact, the problem of other students today is that they are not clear about the examination questions. What is a success or failure hero? In other words, a person is a hero if he succeeds, but not a hero if he fails. Then let
Think about it, many heroes have the shadow of success, and we don't object, but which ordinary person has no success? If both heroes and ordinary people succeed, there will only be success.
How does merit make a hero?
see action
Agree: the opponent only regards the hero who succeeds or fails as the standard to measure the hero, but does not see that he represents a kind of value.
Counterparty: We have made it very clear that we encourage success, but it also depends on people's behavior.
The pursuit of success is precisely the theory of success or failure, which often leads to the pursuit of success by hook or by crook.
Zheng Zihao: May I ask another debater, does a hero encourage success by judging success or failure?
Zhou Xuanyi: Opponents, we should encourage success today, but we can't encourage success by any means. So we can't encourage heroes to be judged by success or failure. I want to ask you a logical question.
Is success a sufficient or necessary condition for a hero?
Fu Xin: Why do other debaters only see unscrupulous success? Can't we take the essence and discard the dross when we advocate it?
Lei Yu: This is not to say that we want to see success by hook or by crook. The question is, how many people will succeed by hook or by crook under the guise of success or failure heroes? Ask other students to answer our four questions.
Wu Tian: Do opponents think that economic development is not desirable because today's economic development may bring environmental damage? Don't we have other values to restrain today?
Ding Yuan: Another student's analogy is inappropriate. How do you know that success or failure is the hero's economic development rather than environmental damage? Another student hasn't answered our four questions yet. Let me ask one more specific question.
Q: Kuafu Chasing the Sun and Jingwei Reclaiming the Sea failed. Are Kuafu and Jingwei Heroes?
Chen Xiaohuan: Actually, the wrong answer today is from other debaters. They only regard the hero who succeeds or fails as the standard to measure the hero, but they don't see that he represents a kind of value. Excuse me, drum.
What's wrong with encouraging success?
Jiangge: We have made it very clear that we encourage success, but it also depends on how people pursue success. It is success or failure that leads to unscrupulous pursuit of success. only
Only you didn't answer, is success a sufficient condition or a necessary condition to become a hero? Let me ask you another negative question. Is failure a sufficient or necessary condition to be a non-hero?
Zheng Zihao: Our society not only has a single value, but also can restrict each other in the values of pluralistic coexistence. Our society also advocates morality, and we also pursue truth, goodness and beauty.
Lei Yu: It turns out that another classmate said that it is part of the correct values to talk about heroes by success or failure. Heroes are desirable, but let's think about it. The tire is still a part of the car, and it is ok to sit in the car.
Yes, everyone is sitting on the tire. Is it desirable or not?
Fu Xin: The other debater said it well. You did see the negative effects. But we are talking about the values of a society. Why can't we take the essence and discard the dross when advocating social values?
Its dross, will our society advocate utility?
Ding Yuan: According to another student, today's debate should be changed to "It is appropriate to talk about heroes by success or failure". Please don't confuse the topic. Another student is very substantial and necessary.
Didn't answer once. Please tell me whether it is a sufficient condition or a necessary condition. Does it matter?
Wu Tian: We don't need to see whether this is a sufficient condition or a necessary condition. Because what we see today is a hero based on success or failure, which is a value orientation of pursuing success. Why not this value orientation?
Take? Ask the other debater to answer directly.
Jiang Ge: I think we have answered this question clearly in the second, third and fourth debates, including me. You don't explain the logical question, but ask a specific question. Yue Fei's ideal is to go straight to Huanglong,
Drinking with gentlemen, this ideal finally failed. Why is he still a great hero in history?
abstract
■ Positive: It is advisable to discuss the value of a hero by success or failure, because first of all, it conforms to human nature. Man is an animal that pursues meaning, and success is one of the best interpretations of this meaning.
■ The opposing side: Heroes are also people. He has both Excellence and fatal weakness, and success or failure is only the result of an instant.
Zhou Xuanyi (four opposing arguments): Today we are going to start with logic. How can the opponent debater say that it is only a logical question to talk about heroes by success or failure? We talked about fact judgment, and the other classmate said that in order to become.
How can a defeated hero be just a factual judgment? Then I really don't know what we should talk about today.
Indeed, we know very well that what the other debater wants to tell you today is that we should see the true colors of heroes in success, which we never deny. But when we really theorize about heroes,
Wait, what do you see? Please think about it, why do we say "off" when we succeed and "off" when we fail?
So a hero? This just shows that the true nature of a hero exists beyond success or failure.
Today, our debate has made this very clear. Heroes are also flesh and blood. He has both Excellence and fatal weakness, and success or failure is only the result of an instant. The outcome of success or failure
There are many factors, not only the subjective efforts of the protagonist himself, but also the objective factors such as weather, geography and human harmony, all of which are independent of human will. How can there be room for the East China Sea Dragon in one square inch?
How to judge the earth-shattering heroism?
However, when success or failure becomes the yardstick for judging heroes, the lofty spiritual quality of heroes will be forgotten by us. When success becomes the standard to measure heroes, the means become irrelevant. what
Yes, meanness becomes the passport of the despicable, while nobility can only be used as the epitaph of the noble. Such a heroic view of quick success and quick success and unscrupulous means is of great significance to the reality that utilitarian rationality is expanding and humanistic spirit is declining today.
For society, is it clear at a glance whether to purify our morality or to annihilate our conscience?
Chen Xiaohuan (four arguments for the positive side): As the saying goes, "A hero has been a teenager since ancient times" and "a newborn calf is not afraid of tigers". Why? Because everyone embodies a value orientation of pursuing success, but today,
The debater sees the hero only by facts, not by value. What they want to demonstrate is an inadvisability, that is, it is not advisable to judge the success or failure of heroes from the perspective of facts or values. however
Today, the opposing debater not only failed to demonstrate the inadvisability, but also once fell into the quagmire of factual judgment.
Is it advisable to judge whether the hero is correct by success or failure as a fact and whether it is desirable by value? These are two different things, even from the perspective of fact judgment, it is not the same thing to talk about heroes by success or failure.
This is not undesirable.
Today, we think it is advisable to talk about the value of heroes by success or failure, because first of all, it conforms to human nature. Man is an animal that pursues meaning, and success is one of the best interpretations of this meaning.
Some people don't want to break through, and no one doesn't want to succeed, because this is a heartfelt yearning.
Secondly, heroes can promote social progress based on success or failure. The lessons of failure are valuable, but progress must be achieved through success. A society is not built by a group of losers, it is social.
Progress is accumulated by the success of countless people.
Thirdly, judging heroes by success or failure is conducive to the unity of personal value and social value. Personal value may become selfish if it is divorced from social value, and so may social value without personal value.
It's only nominal.
The new era has given new meaning to success or failure, and the new century has given new mission. Only the hero who pursues success is a strong man of an era, and only the hero who despises failure is a nation.
The backbone of the family.
(The defense is abridged)
The judges are smart.
Xu Tingfang (judge's representative):
The positive strategic main axis is this, that is, the value orientation of pursuing success after success or failure is desirable. This opening statement gives a very broad space for the front. Not to be outdone, their
Some people think that achievement is success and lofty spirit is hero. This definition narrows the loose definition of a square.
Today's debate is success or failure. Positive emphasis on the spiritual value orientation behind success or failure, with emphasis on success or failure. Negative takes lofty bearing as the definition standard of hero, with emphasis on hero.
If the proponents dare to face up to a key contradiction, that is, the winner is king and the loser is the enemy, the debate may be wonderful to a higher level. Just when both sides made their own achievements, the other side suddenly sprang up.
Highlight, because the positive side uses an argument, so the negative side must prove completely undesirable, and the positive side only needs to prove desirable. The opponent said that this argument is actually that "only state officials can set fires, not hundreds of people."
The surname is "lighting". This kind of counterattack not only hit the nail on the head, but almost came close to sealing the throat with blood. The referee ruled that the opponent won.
(2) The ancients said "the theory of success or failure of heroes since ancient times". For many years, it has been deeply imprinted in people's hearts like truth, but today, people prefer "not to judge heroes by success or failure" because they have seen too many such things in their eyes: some people do whatever it takes to succeed; Some people's efforts for ten years are the result of failure; Some people succeed many times and are blamed for a failure; Some people fail many times and are called so-called heroes because of one success. They look in their eyes and think in their hearts: it is better not to talk about heroes by success or failure!
Based on the above psychology, more and more people in today's society think that "heroes are not judged by success or failure". However, I really beg to differ. If you are bored, you might as well listen to me carefully, which will definitely make you suddenly enlightened, which will also increase the interest of the other party. Why are you unhappy?
Xiao Sheng believes that "heroes should be judged by success or failure"
First of all, I want to correct a conceptual mistake. Usually people think that "success is a hero", that is, "success is a hero, failure is not a hero", but it is not. This explanation is a one-sided understanding of the meaning of "success or failure as a hero". In the big circle of "success is a hero, failure is not a hero", it is only one member of the circle, and there should be other members in the circle. Such as "success is also a hero, failure is also a hero", "success is not a hero, failure is also a hero" and "success or failure is not a hero". In this way, it is a comprehensive "success or failure hero." When we look back at those heroes who failed to come out because "success is a hero, failure is not a hero", we can justly give them a heroic aura. Yes, Napoleon was defeated in the Battle of Waterloo, but we still say that he is a hero, because we have "defeat is also a hero". In this way, the perfection of everything, the perfection of feathers, has also become a hero because of "judging heroes by success or failure." Now I want to talk about how the other three viewpoints talk about heroes. Success is a hero, failure is not a hero. It only talks about some successful heroes, but it can't talk about failed heroes, but we must admit that it talks about heroes (the heroes it can't talk about are given to the other three). "Success is not a hero, failure is a hero" can also be a hero? Yes, it's just that it's about very few heroes. This view may be hard for everyone to accept, but it doesn't matter, you will understand if you can't see the content. Some people have made many small successes in life, but we can't say that they are heroes, because once those successes are put far away, they are nothing, so "success is not a hero." However, some people have repeatedly lost and fought in major battles. In order to defend the territory of the motherland, their spirit is really good, so there is a saying that "defeat is a hero"; "Success or failure is not a hero", for this view, if success or failure is regarded as a small gain or loss in life, we will easily accept it. How can we get the great hero in people's mind from the suffering and loss in life?
I admit that "success or failure hero", "success or failure hero", "failure hero" and "failure hero" are all one-sided. But they all talk about heroes and heroes from their own one-sided aspects. When heroes in all aspects are combined, they become heroes in people's lives. Such heroes include all heroes, which means a lot.
Marshal Chen Yi said that it is easier to be a successful hero than a failed hero. It seems that it would be better to change it to "it is difficult to be a successful hero, and it is even harder to be a failed hero". But it just shows that "success is also a hero, and failure is also a hero." Isn't this the view of "success or failure hero" in "success or failure hero"?
Based on the above explanation, I want to say that "heroes should judge heroes by their success or failure". As long as you are a real hero, "hero success or failure" can definitely tell you (if you can't, it's probably because you are not a real hero). Please remember that the so-called "hero is not judged by success or failure" is only the encouragement of leaders and the comfort of friends, and it has nothing to do with real heroes, while "defeating yourself" is always a slogan that is meaningful only to yourself and meaningless to others.
My friend, now you should feel that "success or failure is a hero"!
(3) Don't judge heroes by success or failure.
"The winner is king, and the loser is kou." For thousands of years, this concept of success or failure has taken root in the hearts of China people, and has become the standard for judging people and judging right and wrong.
However, through the ages, how many failed heroes are recorded in history books? So I advocate: don't judge heroes by success or failure.
Xiang Yu, the overlord of the Western Chu State who broke the Wujiang River, was a tragic hero. Liu Bang, who gained the inheritance of the Han Dynasty for more than 400 years, left no eternal fame after his death. Xiang Yu, who committed suicide in Wujiang River, won the sympathy, tears and hatred of countless people for thousands of years. His famous saying, "Killing me by heaven is not a crime of war", reverberates more and more between heaven and earth, stinging the chests of heroes of all ages. Xiang Yu was a child prodigy, but he lost everything. However, he died young and gained eternal life in history. His short and energetic life created a tall image of a tragic hero.
Bacon said: "successful failure is the so-called success;" The success of failure is still called failure. " Doesn't this also profoundly reveal the truth that Mo talks about heroes by success or failure?
From another perspective, the failure of Dong's repeated appeals is also the success of mankind's pursuit of peace. In the eyes of everyone who pursues peace, Dong is a dove symbolizing peace. He is a hero in our hearts.
Heroes are always admired and loved. Success can be a hero; Failure can also be a hero.
If a successful hero gives people more encouragement and strength, then a failed hero contains the unique dignity of a tragic hero in addition to its tragic and tragic. When chic goes with the wind, it will leave that unique dignity to future generations.
So I advocate: "Don't judge heroes by success or failure."