Current location - Quotes Website - Excellent quotations - Argumentative essay sample
Argumentative essay sample

There will be analysis later

Here are three sample essays from 2005 for your reference.

Reference examples for essay writing (1)

Construction must not be carried out in a way that harms the interests of the masses

Compulsory demolition in Jiahe County, Hunan Province and illegal demolition in Zhouzhi County, Shaanxi Province The relevant persons responsible for the illegal occupation of cultivated land have been severely dealt with (see the second page for relevant reports). These two incidents are typical cases of local governments abusing administrative power and carrying out construction in a way that harms the interests of the masses.

Our country is in the stage of rapid urbanization development and needs to maintain a reasonable development speed and moderate construction scale. Demolition

and land acquisition are both necessary. However, all regions and departments must stand at the height of practicing the important thought of "Three Represents",

guided by a scientific outlook on development and a correct view of political performance, and correctly handle all aspects of the urbanization process. In order to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the people, we must resolutely implement the central government's policies and measures on macro-control and resolutely correct the infringement of residents' interests in the demolition of urban houses. and problems that infringe on the interests of farmers during land acquisition.

Urban house demolition and rural land acquisition must adhere to the "people-oriented" approach. Practice has proved that if this is achieved,

a win-win situation will be formed for social benefits, corporate interests and personal rights and interests. On the contrary, one-sided pursuit of construction speed and one-sided emphasis on

reducing The cost exceeds the resources, environment and people's affordability, and the price must be damage to the legitimate rights and interests of the people. In the land acquisition and demolition work, "people-oriented" must be adhered to. We must never lower the demolition and land acquisition compensation and resettlement standards just because of limited local financial resources; we must never lower the standards for demolition and land acquisition compensation and resettlement for the purpose of attracting investment. , to meet the requirements of developers at the expense of the interests of the people; we must not build in a way that harms the interests of the people for the sake of political performance and image.

Urban house demolition and rural land expropriation must be administered in accordance with the law. In order to regulate house demolition and land acquisition and safeguard

the fundamental interests of the people, the country has promulgated a series of laws, regulations and rules, requiring governments at all levels and relevant departments to correctly perform their duties

, to achieve a fundamental change from focusing on management by administrative means to management by legal means. We must not replace market behavior with government action, never replace legal procedures with administrative orders, and never undermine demolition and land acquisition by one-sided emphasis on making way for the government's "

key projects" The principles of openness, fairness and impartiality.

Urban house demolition and rural land acquisition must be carried out within our capabilities. Governments at all levels, especially leading cadres, must

correct the guiding ideology of economic work, and reasonably determine the scale of urban construction and land according to the local social and economic affordability and actual needs of development. Expropriation scale. Resolutely stop the "image that is divorced from reality and involves large-scale investment in the construction of administrative centers, central business districts,

convention (expo) centers, large lawns, large squares, wide roads, etc. that are blindly compared, greedy for big money and foreign goods, and waste people and money.

Project" and "Achievement Project". We must proceed from reality in everything, proceed from the interests of the people in everything, act in accordance with objective laws in everything, and act in accordance with the principle of diligence and thrift.

Strengthening the management of urban house demolition and rural land acquisition is related to the vital interests of the people, to economic development and social stability, and to the implementation of the central government's macro-control policies . All regions and departments must learn lessons from these two incidents, draw inferences from one example, and draw lessons from them. Controlling the scale of urban house demolition and rural land expropriation is an important measure to implement the central government's macro-control policies and an important part of ensuring social stability, and is included in the government's work this year.

The task is listed as an important task in the special governance of clean government construction.

Administer in accordance with the law, strictly based on urban construction planning, reasonably determine the scale of demolition and land acquisition, standardize approval procedures, improve compensation and resettlement policies, carry out in-depth land market governance and rectification, and resolutely investigate and deal with In the event of illegal and illegal activities in urban house demolition and rural land expropriation that harm the interests of the masses, we must resolutely safeguard the unity, authority and effectiveness of the central government's macro-control policies and ensure stable and rapid growth of the national economy.

Reference examples for essay writing (2)

Strictly observe examination disciplines and behave with integrity

On the eve of the national college entrance examination, the Ministry of Education issued the "Measures for Handling National Education Examination Violations." This measure clearly stipulates possible violations and penalties for candidates and proctors

and has won the hearts of the people and is generally welcomed by candidates and parents

.

In recent years, cheating and irregularities in examinations have become increasingly serious and have become a major social hazard. It extends from daily examinations in universities, middle schools and primary schools to ordinary college entrance examinations, from recruitment examinations to various professional and technical title examinations, and from cheating by school students to cheating by public officials. , from cheating by candidates to cheating by proctors and other staff, cheating collectively, from general cheating

to using modern tools to cheat. It should be noted that examination fraud has caused serious social problems. Some people have used various "fake diplomas" to sneak into the civil service, and some people have obtained "masters" and "doctorates" by using others to take exams on their behalf < /p>

Degree. What is particularly worrying is that these phenomena threaten the authority, fairness and seriousness of the unified national education examination

, harm the vital interests of the masses, and corrupt the social atmosphere.

The importance of the college entrance examination to candidates is self-evident. I spent ten years studying hard every day, just to get good grades and get into a good university. Some people perform normally on the spot and get high scores; some people fail to perform well and get unsatisfactory results. This is normal

Regardless of whether you do well or not, the exam treats everyone equally, and the opportunity to go to college is also equal for everyone.

Exams are not only a test of a person’s performance, but also a test of fairness. If someone commits fraud and opportunism, it is unfair to other people. It is equivalent to depriving other candidates of their due rights through unfair means and stealing other people's access to university. opportunity. This is the greatest unfairness and injustice to candidates.

Cheating not only harms the order of the examination room, but also damages social credibility. The integrity of a society is composed of various aspects. Honesty

Being truthful and trustworthy is a basic requirement for people, and it is also an essential ideological and moral quality for college students. "People cannot stand without trust." The more people who believe in integrity, the higher the level of social integrity will be. People in society must abide by certain rules, otherwise individuals will lose their foundation and society will lose the rules for its operation. The integrity test is an important part of students' ethics, and the examination style and discipline are an important part of social integrity. Starting from this year's college entrance examination, every candidate will sign a letter of commitment to the integrity test, hoping that candidates will fulfill their promises

, abide by the rules and disciplines, and submit an honest answer sheet to the society.

To eliminate various cheating and irregularities in examinations, we must not only strengthen the construction of examination style and discipline, but also increase the prevention and investigation of cheating and the use of various means

We should regard the integrity examination as a systematic project to manage the educational environment, increase the publicity of integrity, compliance, discipline and law-abiding examinations, and through the concerted efforts and effective supervision of the whole society , create a social trend of "honest examinations

are glorious, cheating and violation of disciplines are shameful", making the sacred examination room truly a "playing field" for equal competition.

The college entrance examination is approaching, and more than 7 million candidates will face practical tests after years of study. This is an important moment for candidates to display their talents, and it is also an important moment in their lives. I sincerely hope that every candidate can perform normally, achieve good results, and make their due contribution to the integrity construction of the whole society with practical actions.

Thesis Counseling Series No. 10: Reference Examples for Essay Writing (3)

People's Commentary: Radically eradicate "slow action" to speed up government agencies

Wuhan Municipal Legal Affairs Office News came out that relevant government departments in Wuhan will adopt the "first inquiry responsibility system" and the "one-time notification

system" to deal with the "slow behavior" of civil servants.

Today, with the rapid development of social economy, we must be clearly aware that there are still some problems in the change of work style in the government system

that cannot be ignored. For example, some cadres have poor work styles and attitudes, weak sense of centrality and service,

do nothing, act slowly, or even act randomly.

At present, governments at all levels are actively implementing the "Administrative Licensing Law", and civil servants' "inaction and disorderly behavior" have become the focus of supervision. However, civil servants' "slow actions" But it was once ignored for various reasons. Some people explain "slow action" this way: I am used to following the steps step by step. No matter how difficult or urgent the problem is, I always study it and ask the leader for instructions before replying, so that some things can be done on the same day. The matter cannot be dealt with expeditiously.

In fact, there is no essential difference between "slow action", "inaction" and "random action". They are incompatible with the "Four Major Disciplines" and "Eight Requirements" put forward by the Third Plenary Session of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection

and are incompatible with the basic requirements of civil servants

and damage the body and functions of the government. Reduce the level of administrative efficiency and affect the government's image among the people. Even in a certain sense, "slow action" is more terrifying than "inaction" or "random action". Because "slow behavior" is relatively hidden, it is difficult to detect. Even if it is detected, it is difficult to "convive" it. In other words, "acting slowly" is like diabetes

It looks fine, but in fact it has serious hidden dangers and is likely to endanger "life", that is, the normal operation of government body functions

Transfer.

Therefore, it is imperative to deal with "slow actions", but it should be started in advance, before the disease becomes terminally ill.

Today, in order to solve the harm caused by "slow action", the relevant government departments of Wuhan City have clearly stated that they will implement the first inquiry responsibility system and one-time notification system within the system: For all matters related to the department, every employee in the department must give a clear answer to the party concerned and handle the matter within a time limit. This attitude and measures of serving the people and being responsible to the people are obviously worthy of recognition and reference.

However, to completely eradicate "slow action", it is obviously not enough to rely solely on the "first inquiry responsibility system" and the "one-time notification system"

It is also necessary to find out the correct method according to the characteristics of the work. We will refine and improve the relevant assessment standards and measures for civil servants to identify weak links.

For example, standardize the handling of some tasks that do not have clear time limits; unify the principles for handling complex issues that are feared both by inaction and random actions, and that civil servants themselves are uncertain about. At the same time, supervisory agencies at all levels, as specialized agencies for the government to exercise

supervisory functions, must strengthen supervision and inspection of government departments’ performance of their duties.

People often say that society is undergoing transformation and the government needs to be reshaped. Government in the modern sense should be limited government, effective government, service government, transparent government, responsible government, etc. Regardless of how the government's requirements and goals are positioned, we can all see that the government and its staff should be efficient, have a sense of responsibility, and serve the people. In the implementation process of specific government actions

only by further refining and improving the reference benchmark for the effective implementation of a system can public opinion and political sentiment be passed

through some small The platform achieves seamless docking. In this sense, it is the details that make modern government. As transaction cost

Oliver Williamson, the master of economics, said: "The action is in the details."

In fact, the standard by which people evaluate a service reform measure proposed by the government is very simple, that is, how the government does it.

Whether it does better than before, if not, How to achieve improvements. It can be said that details are always considered in every government

The service level of civil servants also deeply affects all aspects of people's lives.

Modernization requires modern government, and modern government promotes modernization. China has bid farewell to the "shortage economy", but it does not mean that it has bid farewell to the "shortage society". Compared with the modern economy and society, we are faced with excess supply in many areas.

There are many "shortages": lack of credit, lack of talent, lack of market order, etc. But for the government in the transition period

, easing or even eliminating social "shortages" of services and speeding up government agencies should be the clearest direction of its efforts; and to achieve all of this

, we should start by eradicating "slow action".

Argumentative essays contain three elements: arguments, arguments, and arguments.

(1) Argument

(1) What is an argument: An argument is the point of view to be discussed and expounded in the article, and it is the opinion and proposition that the author wants to express. When reading an argumentative essay, the first thing is to find, extract and understand the argument of the article.

(2) There are several arguments: an article can have one argument or more than one. If there is more than one argument, the central argument needs to be made clear. These arguments can be parallel or progressive, but they should all obey the central argument of the full text.

(3) Position of argument: The argument of the article can be arranged at the beginning, the middle or the end of the article. That is, it can be placed anywhere in the article. But more often than not, it is at the beginning of the article, and the same is true for paragraph arguments.

(4) Presentation method of arguments: Some arguments are expressed in clear sentences in the article, and we only need to find them; some are not expressed directly in clear sentences. It requires readers to extract and summarize it themselves.

(5) When presenting and establishing arguments, attention should be paid to:

①Correctness. The persuasiveness of an argument is rooted in the correct reflection of objective things, which in turn depends on whether the author's position, viewpoint, attitude, and method are correct. If the argument itself is incorrect or even false, no matter how hard the argument is, it will not convince people. Therefore, correct arguments are the minimum requirement for an argumentative essay.

②Darkness. What you are for and what you are against should be very clear, not ambiguous or vague.

③Novelty. The argument should be as novel and profound as possible, beyond the opinions of others. It should not repeat other people's clichés, nor should it be irrelevant and general talk. It should be as original and novel as possible.

(2) Arguments

(1) What are arguments: Arguments are the materials and basis for proving an argument.

(2) Types of arguments: ① factual materials, ② theoretical materials.

①Factual materials used as arguments can be a. specific examples, b. Summary of facts, c. Statistics, d. Personal experience and feelings.

② Theoretical materials used as arguments can be a. Classic works and wise sayings of predecessors, b. Folk proverbs and sayings, C. Scientific axioms, laws, etc.

(3) Requirements for using arguments: ① Confirmation. We must choose the hard and typical facts. When citing theoretical materials that have been tested in practice as arguments, attention must be paid to the precise meaning of the cited theory itself. ②Typicality. The examples cited should be broadly representative and represent the common characteristics and general nature of this type of thing. ③Unity of arguments and arguments. Arguments are meant to prove arguments, so the two should be closely linked and consistent.

(3) Argument

(1) What is argument: Argument is the process of using arguments to prove an argument. The argument of the argumentative essay is to solve the problem of "what to prove", the argument is to solve the problem of "what to prove", and the argument is to solve the problem of "how to make the argument". The purpose of argumentation is to reveal the internal logical relationship between arguments and arguments.

(2) Types of argument: Argumentative arguments are generally divided into two types: argumentation and refutation.

① Argument is a method of argumentation that uses sufficient arguments to positively prove the correctness of the author's own argument; ② Refutation is an argumentation method that uses powerful arguments to refute other people's wrong arguments. Both argumentation and refutation are a kind of proof. One is to prove that it is correct from the positive side, and the other is to prove that it is wrong from the negative side.

They can use essentially the same argumentation methods.

(3) Basic argumentation methods: including three major categories and five types: induction, illustration, deduction, analogy, and contrast.

①Induction method. Inductive argument is a method of argumentation from the specific to the general. It uses many individual examples or sub-arguments, and then summarizes their unique characteristics to draw a general conclusion. The induction method can first give examples and then draw conclusions, or it can first put forward conclusions and then prove them with examples. The former is what we usually call the induction method, and the latter is what we call the illustration method. The illustration method is an argumentation method that uses individual and typical concrete examples to prove the argument.

②Deductive method. Deductive argument is a method of argumentation from general to specific. It starts from general principles to derive conclusions about individual cases, and the connection between its premises and conclusions is necessary. There are many forms of deduction such as syllogism, hypothetical reasoning, disjunctive reasoning, etc., but the most important one is syllogism. A syllogism consists of three parts: major premise, minor premise and conclusion. For example, the major premise "all metals can conduct electricity", the minor premise "iron is a metal", and the conclusion "so iron can conduct electricity".

③Comparative method. Comparative argument is a method of argumentation from individual to individual. It is usually divided into two categories, one is the analogy method and the other is the contrast method. Analogy is a method of comparing different things that have the same or similar properties and characteristics in some aspects to draw conclusions. The contrast method is a method of proving an argument by comparing different things whose properties and characteristics are opposite or antagonistic in some aspects.

(4) Refutation methods: There are three methods of refutation, namely ① refute the argument, ② refute the argument, and ③ refute the argument. Since an argumentative essay is organically composed of three parts: argument, argument, and demonstration, refuting the argument or argument also denies the argument, which has the same effect as directly refuting the argument. A refutation paper can combine several refutation methods to enhance the power and persuasiveness of the refutation.

① Refuting arguments, that is, directly refuting the one-sidedness, falsehood or fallacy of the opponent's argument itself. This is the most commonly used method in refutation. ② Refuting arguments, that is, revealing the errors in the other party's arguments in order to overthrow the other party's arguments; because wrong arguments and arguments must lead to wrong arguments. ③Rebuttal argument, that is, expose the opponent's logical errors in the argumentation process, such as the contradiction between the major premise, minor premise and conclusion, the contradiction between the opponent's arguments, the contradiction between the argument and the evidence, etc.