In addition, in recent days, in the name of epidemic prevention, some places have abused their powers to make things difficult for the masses, resulting in changes in epidemic prevention. Some people don't talk about it. In fact, on the surface, it is blocking control, ignoring the interests of the masses and people's livelihood demands, interrupting the normal production and living order at will, and even ignoring the life safety of the masses, damaging the image of the party and the government and hurting the hearts of the masses. There are even some people who take the opportunity to make a fortune. Compared with the epidemic, these phenomena sting people's hearts. The resulting helplessness, boredom and even anger are understandable.
Epidemic prevention and control is anti-virus, not anti-human; It has always been "people-oriented" and there is no "epidemic prevention first". No matter what kind of prevention and control measures are taken, the goal should be to return society to normal and life to the right track as soon as possible. All the options are our "bridges" and "boats" leading to this goal, instead of simply blocking the civil air defense and doing it regardless of the cost.
In the laboratory of Wenling Center for Disease Control and Prevention, inspectors are conducting nucleic acid testing.
one
During this time, the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022 is in full swing. The crowd in the audience did not wear masks and reveled wantonly, which seems to be no different from before the epidemic. Someone asked, "Now many countries in the world are doing business as usual. Isn't it lying flat? " ? They' let go', why can't we? "
To answer this question, let's look at several sets of data:
Look at the confirmed cases first. Up to now, there are 636 million confirmed cases in COVID-19, and the cumulative death toll exceeds 6.6 million. Recently, 230,000 cases were confirmed and 428 people died. Among them, Japan's population is 65.438+0.26 billion, with 98,000 new confirmed cases every day; South Korea has a population of more than 50 million, and 47,000 new cases are confirmed every day.
Looking at medical resources again, this year, there are 6.7 medical beds per 1,000 population in China, while in 2020, it will be 12.65 in South Korea, 12.63 in Japan and 7.82 in Germany. In 2020, there will be 4.5 ICU beds for every 65,438+10,000 people in China, 28.2 in Germany, 2 1.6 in the United States, 6.4 in France 13.8 in Japan, with the global average of 10. At the beginning of this year, critically ill patients in COVID-19 accounted for 32.7% of the total ICU capacity in the United States, and about 7 ICU beds per 6,543,800 people in COVID-19 were occupied by critically ill patients, which has exceeded the total number of ICU beds per 6,543,800 people in China.
Finally, looking at "one old and one young", by the end of 20021,the population aged 60 and over in China will reach 267 million, and the population of children will exceed 250 million. The "one old and one young" group is very large. According to the latest data from Singapore, the mortality rates of the elderly aged 60-69, 70-79 and over 80 who are protected by vaccines are 0.0 14%, 0.064% and 0.54% respectively. The infection mortality of the three age groups without vaccine protection was 0. 19%, 0.29% and 2.5% respectively. In China, the number of elderly people who have not completed vaccination in three age groups is about 22.64 million, 1.6 1.6 million and 1.4 million respectively. If it is completely liberalized now, the death toll of the elderly over 60 years old in China will reach about 600,000 according to the estimation of infection mortality rate in Singapore.
Although the death toll is a cold number, it eventually falls on every family. Can we accept the reality that people around us leave? It is obviously unacceptable. Because of China's social system, history and culture, values and ethics, we are not allowed to watch our parents, grandparents and children give up in the face of death threats. For example, in some western countries, hundreds of people died from the epidemic in nursing homes. If this happens in our country, I believe it is unacceptable. Knowing this, we can understand our country's efforts to control the epidemic.
According to a paper published by The Lancet magazine, during the COVID-19 epidemic, the global excess mortality rate was estimated to reach 6,543,800+082,000, and the excess mortality rate was 654.38+020.3 per 6,543,800,000 people. The excess mortality rate in the United States is 65438+ 10,000 people179.3; The excess mortality rate in China is only 0.6/654.38+ 10,000 people.
Anything can't just talk about the result, not the process. Today's "business as usual" in western countries is actually based on the passing of fresh life and broken families. According to the latest data, the death toll of COVID-19 epidemic in Europe has exceeded 2 million, while that of the United States is nearly 6,543,800+0,800, making it the country with the largest number of deaths due to COVID-19 epidemic in the world.
According to the statistics of Johns Hopkins University, as of 6: 00 on October 28th 1 1, there were 98,568,849 cases of infection and 97 cases of death in COVID-19.
It is selectively forgetting to admire the freedom and carnival of western countries, but ignoring the painful price they paid; Talking about "controlling" and "releasing" the epidemic situation is a utopian proposition, which is divorced from China's national conditions and development reality. If the epidemic is compared to a choppy river, in order to reach the other side, some countries choose to go shirtless, survive the fittest, and acquiesce in some people becoming victims; China chose to help each other in the same boat, tide over the difficulties together, and try to use a big ship to give everyone a chance to survive. When the big ship is struggling and getting closer to the other side, if you blindly envy those swimmers who have already landed and choose to jump off the boat instead of rowing with Qi Xin, then many previous efforts may be in vain. two
China's anti-epidemic road is different from that of western countries from the beginning, and the logic running through it is "people-oriented, seeking truth from facts and adapting to the times".
I remember that the epidemic situation in COVID-19 was threatening from the end of 20 19 to the beginning of 2020. When the virus was at its worst, we dug deep into the trenches, decisively closed the passage from Han to Hubei, and launched a comprehensive defense war in Wuhan and Hubei, which curbed the spread of the epidemic in a short time. As the number of new cases in China has gradually dropped to single digits, we have assessed the situation, coordinated the prevention and control of epidemic situation and economic and social development, and promoted the resumption of work and production in an orderly manner, making China the first to realize the positive economic growth from negative to positive, becoming the only major economy in the world.
Then, with the weakening of the virus offensive, the domestic epidemic situation generally dispersed. The introduction of external defense, the rebound of internal defense, the adoption of normalized prevention and control strategies, and the concentration of superior forces to break one by one, handed over the eye-catching transcripts of epidemic prevention and control and economic development.
Nowadays, in the face of the gradual weakening of virus toxicity and the change of transmission characteristics, we insist on "dynamic removal", emphasize "scientific accuracy", formulate and implement the ninth edition of prevention and control plan, launch 20 measures to optimize epidemic prevention and control, and constantly iterate prevention and control measures.
Every adjustment follows objective laws and seeks the optimal solution in multi-objective balance.
As a country with a population of1400 million, the cumulative death toll of Chinese mainland epidemic exceeds 5,200. In 20021year, China's GDP increased by 8. 1%, and in 2020 and 20021year, it increased by 5. 1% on average, making it an excellent student in major economies.
Relying on China's institutional advantages and resource allocation, we have tried our best to save people's lives, saved millions of lives and promoted economic and social development, which is a great achievement that can stand the test of history.
Tongxiang Mobile Nucleic Acid "Sampling House"
three
Recently, in the process of implementing "dynamic zero clearing" in some places, due to the problems of understanding, ability, methods and even the interests behind them, the prevention and control policies have been deviated, deformed and out of shape, and some places have even had tragedies that should not have happened.
The policy guarantees that there is no "chess game". The general policy of "dynamic zero clearing" and the 20 measures for optimizing prevention and control formulated by the central government have different interpretations in some places, which greatly reduces the authority of the central policy. In some people's eyes, epidemic prevention and control is only to manage their own "small pond", not to jointly manage the flowing "big river". So "liquidity management" came into being, "I am responsible for the flow, and you are responsible for the management", and the consequence must be "get sick in one place and take more medicine".
Policy implementation is a seesaw. It is dangerous to hesitate or slip away from the implementation of the latest optimization adjustment of epidemic prevention and control. Some places "stall" after "slamming on the accelerator" and finally "take two steps back", which seriously damaged the people's desire for stable expectations. Some places are either "sealed" or "released". How to take small steps, how to prevent and control more scientifically and accurately, and how to allocate resources more reasonably and effectively are far from a set of structured "combination boxing".
"Epidemic prevention first" replaced "people first". In some places, in the name of epidemic prevention, people's livelihood economy and people's lives are despised. What's more, in the policy implementation, COVID-19 is the only disease, and other diseases are irrelevant, which distorts the concept of "life first". Some "overweight" epidemic prevention, but they have no laws and regulations in their eyes, and even come up with various tricks to "deal with" the masses, making them feel chilling.
The existence of these problems can not be ignored, but it is unrealistic to accuse the "dynamic zero clearing" policy. The current epidemic prevention and control is more like a "balance of interests", which requires not only a heart that understands people's livelihood accounts, political accounts and economic accounts, but also an "optimal solution" in a multi-objective balance. How to adhere to the general policy of "dynamic zero clearing", focus on phased objectives, highlight scientific precision, and ensure that policies are not out of shape or deformed, which tests the ruling ability of party committees and governments at all levels and the wisdom and responsibility of party member cadres.
Of course, for us ordinary people, just because some places are out of shape, unscientific and inaccurate in implementing epidemic prevention and control policies, we should not completely deny our epidemic prevention and control policies and the general policy of "dynamic clearing". This is unreasonable, but we only see the small logic of one place and ignore the big logic of epidemic prevention and control. In the prevention and control of epidemic situation, individual epidemic prevention personnel have exposed their shortcomings in ability and style. It is necessary to point out them and urge them to correct them, but also to think that all epidemic prevention workers are bad and even stand on the opposite side of the masses. We can't replace trees with flowers, and we can't go to the scene without any basis to make and spread false news with the help of spliced videos and pictures, lest the world be chaotic. four
Getting out of the epidemic haze can't be solved by "letting go" or "not letting go". Arguments don't automatically solve problems. The most important thing is to start with specific links, quickly improve the ability to find and deal with problems, and strive to achieve soft landing management. This is what we should strive for.
Why can't the virus be "let go" immediately when the mortality rate is low? Take vaccination as an example. The vaccination rate of the elderly over 80 years old in China is only 40%, the vaccination rate of children is not very high, and the overall immunization level of the whole people is not high. Once a large-scale infection occurs, our medical resources may also face the risk of being instantly infiltrated. At this time, instead of obsessing about "letting go" and "not letting go", it is better to improve our vaccine level, prepare our medicines more fully, and build more severe beds. There are "mines" at home and "grain" in hand, so we will not panic in the face of any potential risks.
Why are there "one size fits all" and "layers of overweight"? Sometimes, it seems to be an innovative measure, but in fact it is a policy overweight; It seems that it is not "one size fits all", but it is actually creating a concept to engage in "one size fits all". In the final analysis, the consciousness of seeking truth from facts is too weak, the spirit of doing things is too weak, and the ability to keep pace with the times is too weak. Every decision and every measure has been carefully judged. When it comes to the implementation of this link, we must establish a people-oriented orientation, deal with those who are ineffective in epidemic prevention seriously, and resolutely hold those who are "overweight at different levels" accountable, so that they will all become "street rats."
Why does epidemic prevention in some places seem to be very hard, but it is actually very "hard"? Some places have "codes", but they don't work. It seems to be big data filtering, but it is actually people operating; Different provinces, different cities and even different counties are making their own "codes". When you go to a place, you have to change your code name, which makes people "tired and unloved". It is necessary to truly achieve the national unified health code standard as soon as possible, and the national nucleic acid detection results are interconnected, and the experience of precise and intelligent control in advanced areas can be quickly copied and extended to more places, "innovation in one place, universal in the whole country". Don't let the so-called localization, administration and even interest groups hinder the popularization of technical experience, but try to make data flow as much as possible, let viruses flow less, and let the people toss less.
Why sometimes you don't say what you should say, but the "right thing" is not good and you can't understand it? Some cadres in party member have a weak ability to carry out their work in the spotlight, either avoiding and avoiding the concerns of the masses blindly, or talking a lot at the press conference, but the results are not what the masses want to hear, nor can ordinary people understand. It is necessary to expose those who shirk their responsibilities and shouldn't say it, drive those who can't say it well out of the press conference, and invite more people who are qualified to say it, who can say it well, clearly and accurately, so as to give people more certainty in uncertainty and let authoritative professional voices stand out.
At the Ningbo exit of the Hangzhou-Ningbo Expressway, the staff are waiting.
Behind every ability, there is a common value consideration, that is, people-oriented, life first. The public's voice and appeal have always been the basic point for us to adjust and optimize the anti-epidemic policy. There is only one purpose to fight the epidemic, that is, to benefit the people and to protect everyone's health and safety. If we grasp this point, our steps will not be chaotic and our actions will not be biased.
The epidemic has developed to the present, and prevention and control is no longer a "blind box". Any adjustment is actually an iteration of policies, an optimization of prevention and control, and a step closer to success. We should not abandon ourselves and deny ourselves. We should not follow the rules and set limits for ourselves. For us, epidemic prevention and control is like driving a big ship. It is not good to slow down and stall, and it is not good to turn sharply. Because of this, the prevention and control scheme has been iterated from the first edition to the present ninth edition. Along this direction, I believe there will be more accurate tenth and eleventh editions.
Building a "big ship" for epidemic prevention and control will eventually carry more than 654.38+04 billion people to the other side. When the ship reaches a turbulent place, it needs to be more energetic. I believe that we will not drift forever. As long as we are United, steady and orderly, we will surely get off the boat safely in the near future.