who do you prefer to praise for the above three types of people? Please synthesize the content and meaning of the material to reflect your thinking and choice.
it is required to choose a good angle, determine the concept, clarify the style and draw up the title; Don't copy, don't copy.
material interpretation
this is a typical task-driven material composition. You can follow the following four steps to examine questions and write.
the first step is to refine the composition requirements and clarify the writing tasks. When writing a composition with task-driven materials, candidates should read the materials carefully and read the topic requirements carefully to complete the writing task. The task of this material is concentrated in "Who do you like for the above three types of people? Please integrate the content and meaning of the materials to reflect your thinking and choice. " In this sentence. This sentence focuses on the task requirements set by the proposer. After careful analysis, there should be the following tasks:
1. "Who do you prefer to praise for the three types of people?" The writing object, the main body of the statement and the stylistic requirements are defined. In writing, we should choose one of the three types of people (Aunt Chen, Witness Citizen and Aunt), and we should do it from the perspective of "I" praise. At the same time, the word "like" limits the writing of candidates from the perspective of style and writing ideas. First, write an argumentative essay. Second, praise means praise. "Who do you like?" It is required to set up sub-arguments around the reasons for praise to start writing.
2 "Please synthesize the content and meaning of the materials". This is actually reflected in the requirements of writing argumentation, which should be demonstrated around this material.
3 "reflect your thinking and choice". This is actually another requirement for demonstration, that is, why to praise "this" instead of "that", and the demonstration should have appropriate comparison.
the second step is to analyze the contents of the materials and make clear what is right and wrong. This material has so many layers of content. First, Aunt Chen, who was sweeping the floor, was abused, beaten and complained that "migrant workers beat people" by an aunt who was exercising. Second, the citizens stopped and then surrounded the aunt who chased Aunt Chen and gave testimony to the police. Third, an aunt who was exercising insulted, beat and complained that Aunt Chen was "beaten by migrant workers". Later, under the persuasion of the police and witnesses, Aunt Chen admitted her mistake and gave Aunt Chen 3, yuan in compensation. Fourth, after this incident was exposed by the media, it aroused the concern of the society. Some people praised Aunt Chen, some people praised the witnesses and some people praised the aunt.
There are many aspects involved in this material, but as long as you write around three types of people, that is, Aunt Chen, witnesses and aunts. Grasp the core facts of the first, second and third layers of material content and analyze right and wrong.
1. From Aunt Chen's point of view. Sweeping the floor is Aunt Chen's job. Even when Aunt Chen insults, she still sweeps up the last leaf, which shows that she loves her job and is loyal to her duties. Aunt Chen didn't answer her aunt's insults, beat her back and ran away according to the situation, which reflected her high literacy and forbearance spirit.
2. From the perspective of witnessing citizens. The citizens quickly dissuaded, stopped, and surrounded the aunt who abused, beat, falsely accused, and chased Aunt Chen, reflecting that they dared to uphold justice and give positive energy to society.
3. From the aunt's point of view. She insulted, beat and complained that Aunt Chen's "migrant workers beat people" was wrong and a sign of low civilization. "Later, under the persuasion of the police and witnesses, the aunt admitted her mistake and gave Aunt Chen 3, yuan in compensation." This is commendable, and you can be sure that you will correct it when you know your mistakes. In short, it is necessary to analyze the reasons for praise.
the third step is to choose a good angle and determine the viewpoint of the article based on right and wrong. The so-called "choosing a good angle" means to conceive from a core angle and an important angle. This material should be written from three core angles or important angles: Aunt Chen, eyewitness and aunt. When writing, you can set up arguments around right and wrong. But as far as this material is concerned, the argument should be set around "yes" In turn, you can set up an argument like this: to praise Aunt Chen, you can write from her conscientious and forbearing personality; In order to witness the praise of the citizens, we can write from the aspects of their courage to uphold justice and give positive energy to society; Like aunt, you can write from the aspect of correcting her mistakes. Establishing an opinion in this way is accurate and comprehensive, which meets the examination requirements of this material composition for students.
the fourth step is to reason on the basis of materials and make good use of analogy to demonstrate. In the past, materials always played the role of eliciting opinions, but after eliciting opinions, they were of little use. The materials in the composition of task-driven materials should not only give birth to opinions, but also put "analyzing materials and reasoning from facts" throughout the whole text in concrete writing, which is a remarkable feature of task-driven materials.
As far as this material is concerned, when writing, you should put forward your opinions and demonstrate them closely around one material, and explain your opinions to the readers reasonably in combination with the material. For example, writing praises Aunt Chen, closely linking the materials with social reality and stating the reasons for praise, that is, the merits of conscientious work and forbearing personality, etc., penetrate into the essence through the phenomenon, and the viewpoint should be enlightening and can be promoted layer by layer in structure. You can also contact similar materials for analogy and discrimination, and analyze the core values such as emotion, reason and law behind the incident. It is noteworthy that students' improper analogy in writing makes their persuasion weak and their argument weak. The so-called analogy here means that the behaviors of related parties in the same material are essentially identical or opposite. When writing, you should reason around "the same or opposite", and finally it comes down to the points you express.