when we say that a person has changed, it is not that his personal nature has changed, but that his value system or self-awareness has changed. For example, Charles, special adviser to President Nixon? Coulson, who was foolishly imprisoned to protect the president, later became a reborn Christian. In fact, his temperament has not changed, and his nature has not changed. He just does different things with the same passion, and the focus of his life has changed. We can see examples of changing the focus of life by changing values everywhere: the disgraced British cabinet minister John? Profumo and Michael, the American junk bond king? Milken is engaged in charitable activities; The infamous rock star Oz? Osborne defended animal rights; Hundreds of alcoholics anonymous members abandon bad habits and so on. These examples are encouraging, and they give each of us the hope of finding a way out. They didn't change their nature, or what we call talents, but turned their talents to completely different and more positive purposes. At the same time, we also get a revelation: just like intelligence, talent is value-neutral.

there is no need to say wait until you have money and time to go out for a walk! If you really feel that walking is a part of your life, then you will be like pursuing love, abandoning many obstacles and walking on the road! Smoke less, go to bars a few times less, play less games, don't shop online at random, go to wine and meat parties less, go home from work, read books and check raiders … and do less things that waste money and time. It's really not difficult to walk. If you read less, walk more!

sometimes you want to beg for a meal, but you accidentally get a lot of money. Sometimes you want to show off, only to find that 6S is more than 7, yuan, the world is so big, but the money is so little. Once you were young, you were not as good as money, but you couldn't get old. We like the story that we can make money by hard work, but we live in an era when we are not happy with money.

And the question is, is to have had and lost,Better than not having at all? The question is, do you want to lose yourself after your success or do you want to have nothing?

someone gave me time, and I threw away my money. Someone gave me money, but I didn't lose time. Money can be earned again, but it's old, time waits for no one, and it's easier said than done, but it's already white-haired. In my values, time comes first, wisdom comes second, knowledge comes third, and money is dispensable for me now.

You like something A, which is too expensive, and you think you can be a substitute by buying a bunch of cheap BCD. In the end, you find that you still want A. Therefore, buying the one you want most within your personal acceptance is the most economical consumption concept. Love is the same, don't be together.

The key to a happy marriage lies in the same or compatible values of both husband and wife, and whether a person can be happy also depends on his values. The easier it is to get or realize what you think is important, the easier it is for you to be happy.

The connection between people depends on value. When you can't bring value to others, do you expect others to think highly of you? It's just wishful thinking.

when you start to measure your feelings by material and value, this relationship is simply worthless, even if you are sincere at first.

the greatest significance of reward lies not in the reward itself, but in the affirmation of a certain value concept revealed in it.

The so-called difference in values means that when a candle is given, some people feel that a cake is missing, while others feel that a whip is missing.

In this materialistic society, for ordinary people, money is the only criterion to measure a person's status.

we started from an origin and have gone in different directions. Then let's forget about each other!

no matter how you fail, you can still be saved. But if there is something wrong with the world outlook, it is really hopeless.

all behaviors that violate the values are just walking dead, which is meaningless.

Different values will make people who were close to each other drift away until they become strangers.

The thing itself is meaningless, but the key lies in the significance given to it by the person who did it.

Once the moral ethics began to be tempted by money, it was no longer unreasonable.

if you do something, don't do something. There must be principles when you compromise.