There are two kinds of plucking: one is to get rid of hair, and the other is to get rid of other hair. His own hair pulling or his own hair pulling are just two possible role substitutions, which can be ignored for the time being.
"Zigong redeems people" can be regarded as self-help or saving the world. He was criticized not for saving people, but for "not accepting"!
Unfortunately, later, instead of criticizing "not accepting", we simply "not giving".
-"The country will live and die", and after "life and death", it is often the indifference of the country.
"Benefiting the world" is definitely more than "a dime", so how can we not take back this "dime" after benefiting the world?
-I give a dollar, let everyone earn ten thousand dollars, ten thousand dollars, always give me a dollar!
-I don't want this dollar, and others will not pay it in the future; If you don't give this dollar, you can't borrow money in the future. ...
Therefore, not pulling it out is not really pulling it out, but it is safe after pulling it out and getting back the corresponding compensation.
Self-denial is regarded as "doing good deeds for nothing"; Not pulling his hair is "not doing bad things".
Is it a bad thing to pull out a hair and benefit the world?
If you don't care about the world, plucking people's hair is definitely a bad thing. Can it be a good thing to benefit the world and pluck human hair? Here, we might as well repeat a poem "Truth, how many bad things are in your name!" "
We benefit the world, but we pull out his hair. Does our world bag include him?
If it is included, it may not be good for him. What can be regarded as "benefiting the world"? If not, what does your world have to do with him and need him to pluck his hair?
Do as you would be done by. If you don't want cats and dogs to pluck your hair, don't pluck people's hair.
Why don't I pluck my hair? Because "Zigong is not subject to", "the world" will not be given directly.
I took out a dime to benefit the world. As a result, the world made a lot of money, but I was reluctant to pay back a dime ... why should I pull it out if the world doesn't pay back?
Why don't I pull his hair? Because from another angle, I became him.
Mao "caught it", but he took the life of Chairman Liu Qingqing. This shows the risk of plucking human hair.
Pulling out one's own hair is not good, not good for the world and not appropriate. What should we do?
After learning paragraph 6, we said, "In a society, one thing will never change, and that is exchange!" "
Exchange comes from value, which has two extremes: cost and use value.
I'm giving a lecture here today, and today's food, clothing, housing and transportation are earned by this class, which is a direct cost; I have a wife and children to support, which is an indirect cost. Without direct cost, I can't give a lecture today; If there were no management fees, no one would come to my lecture. ...
You come to class, which is the use value of this class. It may be high or not-it depends on your feeling.
Only if you think it's worth it, will you continue your class; I think it's cost-effective, so I'll continue my lecture. It is worth comparing with the cost performance, and the reference object is "bundled repair"-I will accept the money you pay!
"Control" is the value of this course!
I compared the "Liang Xiu" with the cost and found it cost-effective. You equate "training" with harvest and think it is worthwhile. In this way, "win-win" has been achieved and social wealth has been increased.
Do you find it strange to come to the conclusion that exchange creates wealth?
Think about the way of "body use" and "empty use" in the Analects of Confucius!
From the perspective of value, "cost" is the source of "body". Without cost, the body cannot exist; "Use value" is the purpose of "use". Without use value, you can't "use"!
And "empty" is the difference between "use value" and "cost loss"!
Take "Cocks crow in the morning" as an example.
The rooster may be a corpse, but the morning song does not consume the rooster, and the most loss is two grains of rice. So its cost source is not chicken, but two grains of rice.
Morning singing is the use of roosters, but it is not the ultimate use. The final use is "telling time".
The use value of time, MINUS the cost of two grains of rice, is the "empty use" of the rooster.
Let's take a closer look at "emptiness".
From the cost point of view, if chicken time needs not two grains of rice, but two pounds of meat, it is estimated that few people are willing to use chicken time.
From the point of view of use, everyone has a clock now. The cock crows not only don't tell the time, but also make noise. Therefore, there are not a few cocks slaughtered for crowing!
Without "use", there is no "emptiness" We don't have to tell the time, so the cock doesn't have to crow!
Yes, by the way.
Raising pigs and killing meat is a typical "utilization". The knife goes down, the meat is there, and the pig's life is gone.
But does "use" really have to be used? Let's consider it from a higher angle-the group angle of pigs.
Compared with a pig, the cost is the life of the pig, and the value of meat is lower than the value of life, so it is useful; Compared with pigs, the cost is no longer the life of pigs-it is feed, and the value of meat is higher than that of feed, and it becomes empty again!
Every pig can't escape the fate of being killed, but the pig population has become very large, because-for the pig population, killing pigs is empty.
From "chickens live by singing and pigs die by meat" to "chickens die by singing and pigs live by meat", these two views are completely opposite. What can we learn from it?
The way the body is used!
In order to expand the "emptiness", we should constantly compress the body, and even find substitutes to give up the original body.
In order to expand the "emptiness", for the body, it is necessary to continuously expand the use, and even find the overall use and give up the individual use.
In any case, as long as there is "emptiness", things will have a way to survive, and as long as they can "use emptiness", things will continue to grow. ...
In the words of "the way of body use", "pulling out a dime will benefit the world"
As far as the body is concerned, a dime is the body, which is the cost. It's useless to pull out a dime, but it's useless to get a dime back after use; Getting back 20 cents is using profits. ...
In terms of use, benefiting the world means use, that is, use value. It is useful to use a dime. If you can pay back a dime after using it, it will be empty. Give back 20 cents and you'll make a profit. ...
As far as the body is concerned, don't pluck hair, and no amount of hair is enough; If you want one, your hair will not be less; Pull out one and want two, not only will there be more hair, but also more and more. ...
In terms of use, it is more and more difficult to pull out the hair without returning it; By pulling one after another, you can form your own "hair cycle"; Pull one and return two, and a steady stream of heads will be sent to your door. ...
What is the reason for the continuous flow? It lies in our use of benefits, in our persistence in using benefits, and in our expectation of giving benefits to others-they believe that we will pull out one reward and two rewards. ...
This is our virtue!
Our virtue first comes from our correct methods (using space or profit); Secondly, it comes from our persistence; Finally, it comes from the morality of the people-more and more people believe in us, and they believe in us more and more. ...
Therefore, instead of blaming others for "not pulling out a hair", it is better to reflect on "returning a few hairs to others". Of course, at the same time, we should also improve our credit and let others "lend you a dime" willingly.
This is the case with "if you are old without a big reason, don't abandon it".
When I went with you, I pinned my hopes on you, and I gave you my hair and even my whole body.
The essence of this is that "your credit is high enough and others are willing to invest in you".
High credit does not mean that we can destroy credit. On the contrary, we need to improve credit!
Don't abandon the old, the purpose is to improve credit and let others follow us with confidence.
But not giving up is not absolute, we have our value considerations.
The "great truth" is the great truth. There are many reasons, and the reasons are specific and diverse.
Big is comparison, what to compare? Compare the reason with our credit!
Everything has a price, so does our integrity, and so does our credit.
We can listen to the story of "being dead all our lives", but we must never learn it.
Weisheng did keep the credit at that time, but lost the fundamental credit. Think about it. If that woman comes the next day, what will Weisheng take to fulfill her promise?
Regarding advertising, someone once said, "We should save every penny of advertising and take out every penny for advertising.".
The same is true of credit.
The essence of credit is that we can borrow a dime from others. On the one hand, it is our assets, on the other hand, it is our liabilities.
Credit is our asset, so we should "not abandon the old" and keep our word. Only by keeping promises can we continue to keep promises.
Credit is our debt, so we should consider whether it is worth paying back-if keeping promises is not as good as working hard, why keep promises! Starting over is a big deal, and we will rebuild our credit.
The so-called "big" is to compare the truth (reason) with your own credit: if you are trustworthy and valuable, don't give up; If the "reason" is too big, it will still be abandoned.