Current location - Quotes Website - Excellent quotations - 20 16 The latest scheme of Guangdong college entrance examination reform was introduced. What changes have been made in Chinese subjects?
20 16 The latest scheme of Guangdong college entrance examination reform was introduced. What changes have been made in Chinese subjects?
language

I. Similarities between the National Volume and the Guangdong Volume

1. This proposition is based on the same reason. Both of them are based on the Chinese Examination Outline of the National Unified Entrance Examination for Ordinary Colleges and Universities (Curriculum Standard Experiment 20 15 Edition), and both of them embody the basic requirements of the Chinese Curriculum Standard for Ordinary Senior High Schools (Experiment). Modern Chinese reading has compulsory content (modern Chinese text) and optional content (literary text and practical text are optional).

2. The main components of the test questions are basically the same. The full marks are 150, and the test time is 150 minutes. There are multiple-choice questions and non-multiple-choice questions. The content of the test consists of five parts: Chinese foundation, Chinese application, ancient poetry reading, modern text reading (classified test and compulsory test) and composition.

Most of the language proficiency test sites are the same. All of them are the ability to test words, the ability to distinguish language diseases, the coherence of language, the simplicity and appropriateness of language, the ability to accumulate famous sayings and sentences, the ability to appreciate ancient poetry, the ability to break sentences in classical Chinese, the ability to analyze and summarize classical Chinese content, the ability to screen information in modern Chinese, the ability to analyze and summarize modern Chinese content, the ability to write modern Chinese, and the ability to analyze and write language. They are about 90% the same in the test sites of their main abilities.

Second, the difference between the national volume and the Guangdong volume

1. The overall structure of China National Curriculum Standard Volume is quite different from that of Guangdong Volume. The national curriculum standard test paper is divided into the first reading question and the second expression question. The reading questions in the first volume consist of four parts: modern text reading, ancient poetry reading, literary text reading and practical text reading. The second volume of expression questions consists of two parts: language use and writing. The Guangdong volume consists of six topics: Chinese foundation, reading of ancient poems, compulsory examination of modern literature reading, selective examination of modern literature reading, Chinese application and composition.

2. The scores of each part of the national curriculum standard volume of Chinese are quite different from those of the Guangdong volume. There are 70 reading questions in the first volume of the national curriculum standard volume, including 9 reading questions for modern literature (Guangdong volume 14), 36 reading questions for ancient poetry (Guangdong volume 35), 25 reading questions for literary texts (Guangdong volume 15) and 25 reading questions for applied texts (Guangdong volume 15). Volume 2 expresses 80 points, including 20 points for language use (24 points for Guangdong volume) and 60 points for writing (60 points for Guangdong volume). In addition, the national curriculum standard volume Appreciation of Ancient Poetry 1 1 (Guangdong volume 7 points).

3. There are great differences between the Chinese National Curriculum Standard Volume and the Guangdong Volume in specific test sites, questions and scores. The national curriculum standard does not take phonetic discrimination, classical Chinese function words, classical Chinese content words and classical Chinese information as circular test sites. Discussion text reading only takes multiple-choice questions (9 points for 3 questions), not non-multiple-choice questions (8 points for 2 questions and 8 points for 2 non-multiple-choice questions in Guangdong volume). In 20 15, the classical Chinese reading part of the national curriculum standard volume added the examination of ancient cultural common sense. 14, there were 50 ancient poems of high school and 64 ancient poems of junior high school * * (only 33 ancient poems of high school were tested in Guangdong volume), and the specific application in the context was examined. Literary text reading and practical text reading in the national curriculum standard volume have both multiple-choice questions (1 question 5 points) and non-multiple-choice questions (3 questions 20 points); Guangdong paper only has multiple-choice questions (3 questions 15). The use of words in the national curriculum standard test paper only tests the use of idioms, not the use of two-character words and idioms.

4. There are great differences between the National Curriculum Standard Volume and the Guangdong Volume in the number of small questions and the level of ability. The national curriculum standard volume contains 18 small questions, 6 less than the Guangdong volume. The national curriculum standard test paper examines the reasoning ability and transfer ability in text reading, and examines the inquiry ability in literary text reading and practical text reading. These three abilities are not obvious in Cantonese paper. In literary text reading and practical text reading, if you choose two of the five multiple-choice questions, you will get 5 points, including 3 points for one option, 2 points for one option and 1 point for the other option, which Cantonese paper does not have. In addition, the composition scoring standard of the national curriculum standard test paper is 40 points for basic level (50 points for Guangdong paper) and 20 points for development level (0 points for Guangdong paper 10).

5. The standard volume of Chinese national curriculum is obviously different from the Guangdong volume in the choice of modern Chinese reading texts. For many years, the national curriculum standard volume insists that literary texts only test novels, and practical texts only test biographies; Guangdong Volume 20 15 examines prose and popular science, and 20 14 examines prose and news interviews, and sometimes novels and biographies.

Third, consolidate the language foundation and explore new preparation methods.

1. Inherit and carry forward the successful preparation experience in the past. Although 20 16 uses the national curriculum standard volume, about 90% of the test sites in the national curriculum standard volume are the same as the Guangdong volume, which shows that the excellent preparation experience in the past is still very useful and must be inherited and carried forward. It is suggested that on the basis of successfully preparing for the 20 16 Chinese college entrance examination, we should pay more attention to the cultivation of students' Chinese literacy, consolidate the Chinese foundation, highlight the cultivation of Chinese ability and improve the efficiency of Chinese preparation.

2. Strengthen research and accurately grasp the direction of the national Chinese curriculum standard volume. After all, there is still a big difference between the national Chinese curriculum standard volume and the Guangdong volume, which requires that you must prepare for the exam according to the characteristics of the 20 16 national Chinese curriculum standard volume. The national curriculum standard test paper consists of two parts: the first reading question and the second expression question. The order of answering questions is: modern compulsory questions, ancient poetry reading questions and modern essay topics, then language foundation and application, and finally writing. These have a great influence on the plan, content arrangement and full-volume training of review preparation, so we should have a clear understanding of this and implement it in the specific review preparation.

3. Optimize the strategy and highlight the key points of the test questions. In recent years, the classical Chinese content words, classical Chinese sentence breaks and classical Chinese information in the reading questions of ancient poetry in the national Chinese curriculum standard volume are the test sites in turn, so we should pay attention to preparing for the exam comprehensively when reviewing. 20 15 classical Chinese reading questions in the national curriculum standard volume have added the examination of common sense of ancient culture, so everyone should pay special attention to this examination direction when reviewing and preparing for the exam. The national curriculum standard volume contains 2 questions 1 1, which is 4 points more than the Guangdong volume. Modern Chinese reading has 4 questions and 25 points, which is more than Guangdong paper 1 question 10 points. These key points must be strengthened in the review.

5 184 Guangdong Examination Service Network (College Entrance Examination News, Results, Admission Inquiry)

4. Dare to explore and break through the difficulties in the test questions. In recent years, the national Chinese curriculum standard volume of modern Chinese reading requires 9 points for three multiple-choice questions, emphasizing the examination of information screening, information inference and information transmission. Modern Chinese reading 1 5 multiple-choice questions; The composition of the national curriculum standard volume is very different from that of Guangdong in terms of material selection, material orientation and grading. When reviewing for the exam, we should actively explore and study the differences and strive to break through these difficulties.

5. Broaden your horizons and take the initiative to learn advanced Chinese preparation experience from all over the country. Some provinces use the national Chinese curriculum standard volume earlier, and the research on the compilation strategy of the curriculum standard volume is more in-depth and comprehensive, forming their own experience and characteristics, which is very worth learning and learning from. Through the Internet, newspapers and other channels, we should actively understand and learn from the advanced Chinese preparation experience of those provinces, and use and learn from them selectively in combination with the reality of local, school and class students.