In Pleasant Goat and Big Big Big Wolf, the most representative plot is that Big Big Wolf tried his best to eat sheep but couldn't, and finally left a sentence "I will come back again", which ended with everyone's laughter.
However, have you ever thought that it is a natural law for wolves to eat sheep? Why does a sheep village always turn defeat into victory, and grey wolf can't get a reward after all? It should be noted that wolves have no hatred for sheep, but because of their habits, why have they become heinous bad people? In fact, Big Wolf is the real poor. In order to support his family, he is still strong and optimistic despite repeated failures. He is also a loyal and good father who has done everything for his wife and children. Although he suffered a lot for it, he never gave up. Shouldn't such a person be an example for us to learn? Shouldn't you play a decent role in the play? However, the program group classified it as a villain, which is puzzling.
I thought for a long time without success, so I had to ask my classmates. She also pondered for a long time and finally gave me the answer: "Maybe it's because the wolf eats sheep." Well, it's a sin for wolves to eat mutton. What do wolves eat? Eating grass? How is that possible! In other words, Yang Cun once "taught" Gray that he should not eat mutton and eat grass like them. Hehe, a capitalist face! Gray has also been successfully brainwashed, which is really sad. Have pity on me, little grey. As a wolf cub, I haven't even eaten a bite of mutton since I was born. Now I'm fooled by Yang Cun. I don't think I will eat mutton even if there is one.
Speaking of the pity of wolves, what about Yang Cun? In several ways, it's not much better.
Pleasant Goat, whose father is a capitalist employed by the bourgeoisie, is of noble birth and is the core of other lambs except the village head, and is smarter. It's incredible that he can crack the invention of Big Wolf at once.
Boiling sheep has developed limbs, but simple mind, so no matter how hard he works, he can always become a follower of Pleasant Sheep. Well, I doubt that the screenwriter's public promotion of hierarchy theory and efforts are useless to children. Are these things bad for children?
Lazy sheep are lazy, so they are always laughed at by other sheep. Some people say that it tells us to love labor. What about that beautiful sheep? Why is Meiyangyang sitting with a bunch of fans when she doesn't work and nobody talks about her? Because she's beautiful? If you are beautiful, you can do whatever you want, and you can openly abandon the boiling sheep? Ah, this is one of the core ideas brought by this drama: * * first. In fact, it's no big deal for wolves to eat sheep, but in this play, arranging such a "complete" lineup for sheep has become a sheep exploiting wolves. Is this the value that this drama wants to convey to children?
By the way, there are also bears, which is also quite wonderful. When Logger Vick came out to cut down trees, two bears wanted to drive him home. People stay at home and don't go out. The two bears also suspected that he was studying "secret weapons" at home. Although Logger Vick often doesn't study these things, he is forced to tell her. Come on, who did they mess with? And I suspect that the script of this play is also very problematic: forestry, forestry, not asking you not to cut down a tree, but asking you to develop it moderately within a reasonable range, which also has economic effects, okay? It is said that these two bears were able to build houses with wood when they were children. Why is it evil for Logger Vick to cut down trees? There's nothing wrong with bears fishing, but Logger Vick's fishing has become "bullying small animals"? Oh, what kind of logic! It turns out that the "protagonist aura" is incredibly strong! They are both protagonists, but the two bears represent "justice" and Logger Vick, as a lumberjack, represents "evil". You're right. That's why. Although "Bears Come and Go" has found its own conscience in recent years, and some works of positive value have been produced one after another, the first impression of this animation in my heart is still indelible.
There is no doubt that Pleasant Goat and Big Big Wolf and Bears are mainly aimed at children. This kind of animation is called "split direction". In my mind, Zi Gongxiang's works should be positive, love the party and patriotism, and cultivate the correct values of contemporary children, but these two exceptions are beyond my imagination. One, completely subverting the laws of nature, has become the exploitation of wolves by sheep, which is essentially exploitation. What is the difference? One is to take things too absolutely, blindly publicize and protect the environment, but don't know that forestry should also develop; In addition, there are many things that Xiong Er can do. If it is put on Logger Vick, it will immediately become "politically incorrect". Both tell us that the weak in the past can ride on the heads of the strong and do whatever they want, making people feel no disobedience. It is this insult to IQ that has repeatedly won the cheers of children, and the heat has not diminished. I can't imagine how incredible they are when they grow up and look at these cartoons. Oh! I hope the screenwriters will have a little heart, and don't insult the IQ of generations of children with such works that can't stand scrutiny.