Writing, as a tool, must first be simple and easy to use; when someone is weak and anorexic, the best gift may be just palatable and nutritious gruel. But this common sense is often forgotten by calligraphers: originally writing a copybook should solve some problems for others, but when picking up the pen, they only think about how to express themselves.

Xiaopeng’s copybooks don’t have this problem. The author tried his best to simplify the originally very complex calligraphy techniques, and at the same time no longer artificially emphasized the style marks, which gave this copybook an additional "public consciousness" and "aesthetic breadth". This fact also shows that even in a relatively simple horizontal, vertical and horizontal pattern, as long as the most critical elements of Chinese character modeling can be mobilized, exquisite forms can be created. I think that if the casual readers get close to such copybooks, they will not only find it easy to learn and use, but also feel the author's humanistic care and kindness through the influence of beauty.

Calligraphers all know that rich and exquisite strokes, strokes and strokes are often crucial in calligraphy performance and even determine success or failure. But at the same time, everyone knows that as a writing instrument, these "decorations" should be almost ignored in practical applications. When a fountain pen copybook is purely for "seeing", then it is natural that all the eighteen martial arts should be used; but if this copybook really has the function of being "used" by others, then all the "clothes" must be used Strip it off and show off your style based solely on your physique and muscles. This courage may not be available to everyone: on the one hand, doing so may not reflect your level. A chef who can cook abalone "downgrades" to cook tofu sometimes makes people feel shabby; on the other hand, even if you are willing, The publishing house may also find it difficult to decide to print because it is not gorgeous and high-end enough. Xiaopeng now volunteers to "burn tofu" and use the simplest raw materials and condiments to offer delicious food to people who need "this bite" - he believes that simply by understanding and grasping the structure of Chinese characters, even if it is simplified Chinese characters, even if the words By minimizing the frustration to a minimum or even disappearing, the "beauty" can still be achieved in both horizontal and vertical directions. Of course, courage must be supported by kung fu, and “knowing” must be proven by “doing”. With his precise understanding of the shape of Chinese characters and his strong control over "where to hit", Xiaopeng has almost established a concise "standard" for "writing" - it is both rigorous and elegant. A "floating goose hook" only uses a simple combination of "straight", "horizontal" and "straight", but due to the appropriate length and appropriate position, it can still be impressive and dazzling.

It should be said that Xiaopeng must have considerable experience and established principles to be able to write to this extent. I hope that good copybooks published in the future will also include this part of his experience. To "do it", one must first "know" - if students encounter problems during study and ask themselves or others, the answers they get are often superficial or even confusing. It is up to the person who wrote the post to speak out. The true scripture will not mislead anyone. Of course, there is a little difficulty here: what the author wants to talk about should be completely implemented in the "composition" and "stroke relationship" of "this kind of character", and the principles mentioned are overall, concise, and regular, not Individual, sporadic, word by word. For example, it is said that "you can get a right triangle by combining three strands, four and five". This is the experience of individual cases rather than the generalization of rules; it can only be expressed as "when the length relationship of the three sides is a2+b2=c2, all triangles must be Only with “right angles” can they have the value of “axioms” and be truly useful. Unfortunately, what we often see are always the "experiences and experiences of learning books" rather than "just a few things that can meet the basic characteristics of this kind of characters."