Rong Zhi's second-instance lawyer is Wu Danhong, a professor at China University of Political Science and Law, and a well-known criminal defense lawyer in China. In the trial of the second instance, Wu Danhong pleaded not guilty for Rong Zhi Sr and argued with the prosecution for three days. In the end, the verdict was not pronounced in court, but was pronounced on a date, namely165438+1October 30th. From August to 1 1 month, just the day of sentencing made old Rong Zhi live for three more months.
The French Open was long and slow, but Rong Zhi Sr. was still sentenced in court to uphold the original judgment of death penalty. Wu Danhong and Rong Zhi's family didn't wait for the result of the revision.
Wu Danhong defended Rong Zhi Sr.
At first, Wu Danhong hesitated about docking this case, which was contradictory and tangled. Because taking this kind of case, regardless of winning or losing, there will be a stigma, which is a thankless thing. After careful consideration, I finally accepted the case. Because Wu Danhong is an expert in evidence law, he wants to improve the evidence law through the case of old Rong Zhi.
Wu Danhong's concept of accepting cases lies in the famous saying, "One of the touchstones of whether this country is truly free is its attitude towards those who are considered guilty by the world and those who defend the shameless people of the world."