Ask some basic philosophical terms and concepts of famous sentences. (experts enter)

Give some emergency answers to the landlord for reference only!

1. Is the word rationality perceptual or rational? Is I subjective or objective?

2. Supreme is neither infinite nor infinitesimal. Since neither the maximum nor the minimum can be found, then supremacy must be the root of everything. This root is like the origin of the number axis, regardless of its size.

This question should be put before question 3. How can relativism explain the relationship between supremacy and non-supremacy without understanding nihilism? These two doctrines, as the name implies!

3. Understand the differences at different levels. Supreme is not supreme, there is and there is no right or wrong. Relativism; Nihility is also relative to other theories. All relationships are two sides of one.

5. The landlord's problem lacks a standard rule, which refers to the landlord's perspective on other things. From a dialectical point of view, "reason" comes from experience, such as the relationship between conventional law and statutory law. Everything has yin and yang, and yang has yin and has two sides.

6. From a single point of view, everything is a cycle, and then it goes round and round. The so-called history is the time range we know, and the rest is called no beginning and no end.

(1), the landlord so knowledgeable people will not understand this problem? The landlord used this technique when asking questions. The most basic thing is to invite experts in. This is the simplest and most complicated. Complexity means countless definitions of simplicity, simplicity and complexity are different from different angles. For example, a simple question is like a gobbledygook to Chen Jinrun. Life and death is the most important thing in life, and I will explain it at the end.

(2) Marco didn't finish the whole sentence, saying that evolution is not degradation, but dialectics. Since dialectics is the name of materialism, we can't just mention one side. The reason why people become people is in an endless cycle, that is, to some extent, people understand human history on the premise of human existence.

(3), as I explain these to you, the explanation is shallow, unable to reach the meaning, and the explanation is deep, which is more difficult to understand than the original. The beauty of an old horse is an elegant art, and the public may not like it or think it wonderful, or even care about its existence at all. It has been clearly written in the landlord's sentence that man is both the premise and the result, and directly translated, man is both the cause and the result, and the scope of cause and effect is defined by a single thing, which is the historical scope of man.

(4) Looking at the mountain is a mountain, not a mountain, but a mountain or a mountain. The wind blows the flag, and the flag moves? Wind? The benevolent is moved. The landlord will tell me what is there and what is not, and the answer is attached at the end.

____________________________________________

The following answer may not be asked by the landlord. Even if my answer was asked by the landlord, it didn't let the landlord know what I said, but it limited the landlord's thinking.

I remember a story that a teacher taught his students a new piano score every day, and it became more and more difficult. The students haven't finished learning one, but the more difficult one is coming. Finally, one day the students couldn't help asking the teacher why it was so difficult for us. The teacher told him to play the earliest music score. The students were surprised to find that they were very handy.

So in my opinion, it is really simple to look back at Buddhist scriptures (especially diamond sutra and altar sutra) and Tao Te Ching.

Give a few examples.

One is infinite, infinity is one, the small one is big now, and the big one and the middle one are small now. The fixed Dojo is spread all over the ten boundaries, with ten sides in its body and endless emptiness; At the end of a hair, the treasure king is now; Shurangama Sutra on the top of the Buddha.

Good people. Buddha's nature has no birth, no extinction, no going and no coming. Not the past, not the future, not the present. Great nirvana sutra

The Buddha told Xu Bodhi: "Everything is illusory. If you see a difference, you will see the Tathagata. " Diamond Sutra

If there is a religion that can meet the needs of modern science and coexist with science, it must be Buddhism. -Einstein

Dialectics has reached a very fine realm in Buddhism. Marx

Buddhists are in the advanced stage of rational thinking. It was not until the time of Sakyamuni Buddha that dialectical thinking matured. Dialectics from Buddhism-Engels.

The theory of Buddhism convinced Homo sapiens. -Modern thinker Zhang Taiyan?

Among the world religions, Buddhism is the only religion that really uses systematic and rational analysis to examine the problems in life and find solutions. -Berg, a world famous scholar.

Sakyamuni is really a great philosopher. I usually have a lot of life problems, and he has revealed them clearly. -Lu Xun

Buddhism is the only religion in history that is really valued and based on evidence. -the famous philosopher Nietzsche?

Find out what I am first, then talk about life and death;

The world recognizes things as its own and regards this changeable body as "I". This behavior of recognizing my body as "I" is a typical case of extremes meet, even after my death. ......

When the bodies are joined together, of course, they are scattered and die. This kind of death is immortal. I would like to ask whether matter and energy are immortal, neither increasing nor decreasing (Einstein proved it with an atomic bomb). We are also composed of matter and energy. If we die, where will we die? We will never die. Where will we die?

My body has never been the real me. Why do you say that? When a baby has no memory and no self-awareness, is it "me" at that time? If a person has amnesia, is the body "me"? If a person sleeps, is the body "me"? My body was never me. "I" is the general name of God's knowledge-soul and body. The body is just a container of the soul. People's life and death are just changes in the shape of containers. From body to bardo, it is reported by different professions. Therefore, the Buddha's non-ego means that we should not reverse right and wrong, treat the body as me, and forget the real me-the immortal nature of the Buddha. Of course, the Buddha also said that the human body is rare, which tells us that the human body is a good opportunity to practice, and it is difficult to become a person for a long time, so we should cherish it more. Life and death are just changes in body shape, and the blade is not me, nor me. Why, there is no body and no spirit, both body and spirit are unique, which is the true self!

Pubic body: Many people say they haven't seen it. There is no such body. Has anyone seen modern science find that the vacuum is full of dark matter (about 90% of the total mass of the universe)? The invisible body is not the body? What's that air?

Dialectics of various relative things (yes, no big, no small ...)

It's hard to say clearly about size and future. Let's talk about existence and non-existence first. You used to think you were nothing. It's vacuum, right? What is a vacuum? What doesn't even have air is called a vacuum. Now science has found that there are a lot of particles and energy in a vacuum, and the universe is full of dark matter. Then a vacuum is not a vacuum. This shows that there is no "existence" or "quilt" in matter or at the level of real existence. But we divide it according to cognition. There is no eternal nothingness and there is no eternal existence (see note in/15766000_d.html).

In this way, the size is easy to understand. For what we can see, we are divided into sizes, but if we look at us from an angle that is countless times larger than us, we may only be on an atom, and a desert may be the universe, and our size cannot stand that angle. In other words, things themselves are integrated, and we divide them from our standpoint from different standpoints, and then there will be big and small. This is like drawing a number axis, where the decimals at both ends or in the middle are infinite, and the number axis is just a sign of artificial division. (See from one billion light years to one femtometer/group/USD /topic/42249)

The past and the future are a pair of time concepts. Let's talk about what time is first. Time is the accumulation of changes. It seems that we live in atoms for a billion light years, but we know that tiny particles as we know them, such as quarks, exist for a millionth of a second or even less, so that it is difficult for the atom collider to collect them. Compared with a billion light years, we only exist for a millionth of a second. We know that our bodies are constantly changing every second, but we never thought that the particles in the atomic world in our cells have experienced countless changes and birth and death.