-Review the selection and utilization of materials.
First, about the "three big books"
"If you want to do a good job, you must sharpen your tools first", and the importance of choosing good review materials is self-evident.
There are already many online candidates discussing whether to read the "three big books". I have reviewed three big books and read some other counseling materials. I believe I still have some say in this issue. Personally, I think it is necessary to finish reading these three books. After all, most of its authors are the authors of test papers, and the book covers many teachers' opinions and thinking tendencies, which is more authoritative than any textbook on the market. If you don't read what the author wrote, who else will? By studying the real questions over the years, you will find that the answers to many questions (especially jurisprudence) are the original words in the three books, which is particularly obvious in Volume 1. For example, Volume 1 of 2009, a question about value-added tax, in which the knowledge points are believed to be unlikely to be mentioned in other review materials except the three major editions. Many people say that the exam in Volume One in 2009 was very thin, which led to a low score in Volume One. In fact, if the candidates take a good look at the first book of the three books in the review, I believe there will be good results.
But then again, there are too many contents in three books, millions of words. Reading through them will take too long. If you come again once or twice, it is estimated that you will have to sacrifice three books before going to war.
So how should we treat the three big books? I have two ways: 1. I want to see it, but I don't have to see it all, that is, I choose to see it; The second is to find out the key points and memorize them repeatedly. "Selective reading" means that among the three books, the first book does not need to read the economic law and the judicial position, the second book only needs to read the general principles of criminal law, while the specific provisions of criminal law, criminal procedure law, administrative and criminal procedure law do not need to read, and the third book only needs to read the civil law (the specific review method will be mentioned below). "Find out the key points and recite them repeatedly" as the name implies: find out the key points that need to be reviewed, and then review and recite them repeatedly. This often gets twice the result with half the effort. How to find out the key content? I believe that students in remedial classes may be much more relaxed in this respect. The tutor will help you circle the key points in the explanation. You just need to memorize them after listening. Students who haven't attended remedial classes can also read through what they need to see in the three major books first, and then do the real questions again. Often the content of repeated exams in real questions is the focus. (Finally, add a sentence: the review of the three major books should be carried out in advance. Often the exam year will not be released until May. At this point, it is too late. Therefore, it is recommended to review the textbooks of last year, and the changes will not be too great. You can buy supplementary textbooks after the new textbooks come out. )
About law
If you want to buy a law, you'd better choose the corresponding law with relevant judicial interpretation, which is more convenient to remember and understand. I don't recommend buying key regulations. As can be seen from the real questions in 2009, the questions of judicial examination are often more detailed, and many test sites will inevitably miss key laws and regulations. We must consult various laws and regulations in our usual review. Obviously, key laws and regulations can't meet this demand.
In addition, in reviewing, we must pay attention to the memory of laws and regulations. After all, as a vocational qualification examination, the content of the examination is practical, and the examination requires candidates to master not only the qualitative nature of legal relations, but also laws and regulations. A large number of questions directly examine the degree of mastery of the law, which is very obvious when doing multiple-choice questions. Part of the four options of multiple-choice questions is to examine four different laws. Once one of them can't remember correctly, it is likely to lead to mistakes in the whole topic, which shows the importance of the law. However, there are more than 12,000 laws included in the examination, and people's memory and energy are limited, so it is impossible to master so much content. The memory of laws and regulations should be focused, because only about 65,438+00% of the judicial examination will be obtained. As long as we grasp and master these 65,438+00% contents, it is self-evident to get high marks in the judicial examination. When I was reviewing, I was also troubled by the problem of not mastering the rules well. In the initial review, because I didn't understand the department exam, I couldn't find the key points of the exam, but I recited a lot of methods, but the effect of doing the questions was very poor, especially when I chose more than one. I still remember one time, after finishing a set of procedural law simulation questions, I was so anxious that I cried on my desk because of too many mistakes. This situation was not solved until I took a series of law classes. The teacher in the remedial class helped me to circle the key laws with vivid and humorous explanations. Through the explanation of the jurisprudence behind the difficult laws, a logical system was established between the laws in my mind, which not only made me remember a lot of laws, but also greatly improved the correctness of the problem. Speaking of which, I want to thank Haitian very much.
C, about handouts
The importance of teachers' handouts in remedial classes is self-evident. Professors and doctors in famous universities are often engaged in exam counseling. They have profound and original views on legal knowledge and are engaged in the research of examinations all the year round. They have a very accurate and profound grasp of the key and difficult points of the exam. Their handouts are often the essence of this topic, covering most test sites. Of course, it would be better to be accompanied by a teacher's explanation. Because the teacher's explanation will help you analyze and supplement many key contents, but you can't hear the teacher's explanation. I also suggest you try downloading it online. Handouts are really important!
D, about the real question
When it comes to the real question, almost no one will deny its importance. Classics are popular in the past, and fashion is a classic in the future. True questions over the years, classic works for many years. I remember a famous saying about real questions, "To do real questions over the years is to do future questions". I have been constantly realizing the importance of real questions throughout the review process. It is true that real questions are really important, but this importance does not apply to all subjects. For subjects other than constitution, legal history and economic law, it is not too much to study the real questions. My personal suggestion is to watch it three times. Among them, civil law, criminal law, administrative law, etc. It should be read more than five times, because theoretical disciplines such as civil law and criminal law have a very prominent orientation to the key points. If you do real questions, you will find that many times you just test a few knowledge points repeatedly, just changing the form every year. As long as you really master this knowledge point, you can use any method.
In addition, in the procedural law, the repetition rate of real questions is still very high, and even the same question has been tested for two consecutive years. So we must master the real questions, but due to the limited preparation time, I don't mean to ask everyone to do all the real questions over and over again. It is best to mark the wrong questions and the key parts in the analysis with colored pens after the first pass, only mark the parts in the second pass and only look at the marked parts in the third pass. It is very fast and can save a lot of time.
Like constitutional legal history and economic law, I personally think it is enough to read the real questions, because they are scattered in content, not focused, and the real questions are rarely repeated. As long as you have read the real questions, you can probably grasp the examination ideas of the questioner.
E. About practice
Speaking of "doing exercises", I personally think it is necessary! But to do it well, we can't engage in crowd tactics.
It is important to study real questions, but the number of real questions is limited after all. Often a department method does not have 100 real questions, which is really not enough to cover the examination scope. Moreover, the ability and energy of ordinary candidates to study real questions are very limited, and it is often difficult to understand the true meaning behind them. If the real question is slightly changed, it may not be done. By doing problems, we can strengthen the understanding and memory of knowledge points, cultivate the sense of problems and train the speed of doing problems. But this is by no means to say that it takes a lot of time to do exercises, and it will waste a lot of valuable review time. Second, many exercises have a high repetition rate and low efficiency in doing problems. Third, many exercises are of poor quality, with many wrong answers or no analysis. Doing too many such questions will mislead candidates and be detrimental to review.
I suggest that you choose a set of high-quality exercises (preferably matching) to do in the first round of review, such as white paper, which is not bad. In addition, the questions given by teachers in remedial classes are also of high quality, with few mistakes and comprehensive analysis. They are often sorted out by teachers according to the real questions combined with the predicted test sites, which is of high value.
After finishing the exercise, be sure to mark the wrong part or write it down in the wrong book, so that you can review the previously marked part or the wrong book directly in the next review. When reviewing, we should also focus on the wrong knowledge points before, so as to overcome the weak parts of learning and eliminate the blind spots of knowledge. It's called meticulous work.
F. About remedial classes
Many candidates are hesitant to attend remedial classes. In fact, I have always thought that remedial classes are absolutely necessary. They play the role of boosters. Many people have been admitted without attending remedial classes. The key is that everyone should choose a review mode that suits them.
Many of my friends are studying law, and their professional skills are profound. After a certain period of hard review, they can pass the exam smoothly. However, some candidates may choose to take remedial classes if their legal knowledge is not good or their foundation is weak, just like when I was reviewing, I want to pass the departmental exam at one time. After all, tutoring in remedial classes can not only point out the review direction, make review plans, improve review efficiency and achieve twice the result with half the effort, but also help you to establish or complete the basic theoretical system of law, highlight the key and difficult points of each department of law, which is of great help to review. As an illegal book, my legal foundation is very weak, and I was very unfamiliar with the department examination when I first reviewed it. I have no sense of direction, so it is difficult to review. Later, I took part in Haitian's remote network class, and my preparation for the exam was gradually on the right track.
According to the review plan made by the tutor in combination with my situation, I quickly entered the review state. At that time, I attended classes for six hours every day, reviewing three textbooks and teachers' handouts while attending classes, and the rest of the time was spent doing problems and memorizing rules, so I spent more than seven months preparing for the exam.
Looking back on that time now, I still feel quite fulfilled and happy. Many teachers' lectures are brilliant, incisive in analysis and humorous in language, which makes me full of expectations for attending classes. I'm not bored at all except reciting the provisions of the procedural law. With this in mind, I really want to say thank you to the teachers in the remedial class at that time. Because of your company, I am full of confidence in reviewing the department exams. Thank you!
finally
Everyone's own situation is different, and the review method can't be the same. Here, I only talk about my personal feelings. On the one hand, I hope to exchange experiences with other candidates through the above articles. On the other hand, I will give the participants behind a reflective reference. That's all.
I wish the friends who took the 20 10 exam a dream come true!