He believes that the party will force you to review your achievements in a few short years after graduation, and judge your achievements and income by the standards of your classmates, not by your career goals and success standards. To make matters worse, the idea of reunion in five years will affect the decision you make now. You may adjust your career in order to gain outstanding qualifications in a short time, or make a lot of money quickly so that you can wear formal clothes to the class reunion. You will put those dreams that you have planned for a long time, but will not come true immediately, into a job that you don't really like, but gives you money to buy a luxury car. Don't attend the reunion! Professors at Harvard Business School really have good intentions. He doesn't want his students to lose their career goals or turn a blind eye to what they really want. He doesn't want those smart and talented people to waste their time on positions with high titles and good pay ... Isn't this suggestion more targeted for most people with low academic qualifications and low ability? In fact, blindly setting the goal too high and pursuing fame and fortune are doomed to be self-defeating and boring. However, around us, there are still people who often like to use the famous saying that "soldiers who don't want to be marshals are not good soldiers" to express their lofty aspirations. In fact, can a soldier who just wants to be a marshal be said to be a good soldier? When many people are competing for "generous salary" and "prominent position", we can't help but be alert: Are we getting farther and farther away from rationality? Is it getting closer to idealization? People's career orientation, career orientation and success orientation may have a broad "room for maneuver", so they don't have to confine themselves in narrow alleys or hang themselves from trees.