Current location - Quotes Website - Excellent quotations - About Plato’s three arguments for the immortality of the soul
About Plato’s three arguments for the immortality of the soul

Are life and death two opposite things? I don't think so. When a person dies, he is no longer a human being. Only those who are alive are human beings. In "Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus", Wittgenstein said, "Death is not a thing in life. Man has never experienced death." This is probably what this sentence means. One person's life and death can be opposed to the life and death of others. Someone's life will inevitably lead to the death of some people, and the death of someone will also lead to the death of other people.

If people can live and die, why does the soul only have life and no death? The soul should also have opposition.

Was there a computer before the invention of the computer? If not, people had the knowledge to use computers without computers. A person has lived among wolves since he was an infant. Why can't he recall the knowledge of humans, but he has the knowledge of wolves? This means that the soul has possessed the knowledge of wolves. The wolf became a dog, and the soul gave birth to dog knowledge. Human hybrids except the mule, the soul has the knowledge of the mule. By implication, the soul becomes the sum total of facts. "The world is the sum of facts" in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus 1.1, which can be inferred that the soul is the world, the world is the soul, and everyone is the world, which makes sense.

This view is a bit confusing. If the soul is interpreted as a spirit and immortality is understood as timelessness, then this soul is indeed immortal.