There is a famous saying in the education circle: If a teacher wants to give a drop of water to his students, he must have a bucket of water first. It means that teachers should constantly enrich their knowledge in order to impart more knowledge to students. That's true, but if students just passively accept knowledge as a "container", no matter how hard teachers try to "dump" knowledge, students' income is still limited. Teacher Xu mentioned the idea that "teachers should be students' learners" in class. In order to make it easy for everyone to understand, she drew two circles, one big and one small (the small circle is in the big circle) and said, "The big circle represents the knowledge of the teacher and the small circle represents the knowledge of the students. If teachers only impart knowledge in class, then the small circle will always be confined to the big circle. If teachers change their teaching methods and build bridges between the big circle and the small circle, so that students and teachers can explore the boundless ocean of knowledge together, and the big circle and the small circle will extend outwards indefinitely, it will be a situation in which teachers and students win * * * and get twice the result with half the effort. The ancients said, "It is better to teach people to fish than to teach them to fish." Does the example given by Mr. Xu have the same effect?

Revelation of the Circle

There is a story: It is said that in Einstein's later years, his students asked him, "Teacher, you are already a master in the field of physics, why are you working so hard?" Einstein picked up a piece of paper and a pen, drew two circles on the paper, and told his students, "Under the present circumstances, the field of physics may be that I know more than you, just as you know this small circle, and what I know is this big circle. But the whole knowledge of physics is boundless. For a small circle, its circumference is small, that is, its contact surface with the unknown field is small, and he feels that he has less unknowns; And Dayuan grew up in contact with the outside world this week, so he felt that he had more unknown things and would work harder to explore. "

What vivid two circles and vivid metaphors. In life, we often encounter endless problems and challenges, but what will everyone's answer be?

When I was young, I was smarter, a little savvy in learning molds, and had some small achievements. When the factory increased wages, I was often on the list. But at that time, I was a little carried away, and I seemed to have great confidence. Others couldn't do it, so I was young and crazy. Once at a party with the boss of Tianyuan Bell Factory, he also drank some wine and got drunk. In order to thank me for my support to his work, he casually said: You are worth one million. I remember this sentence for many years, and I was proud at that time. Although I didn't have money, my boss called me worth one million. Didn't I show my value? Under the control of such arrogance, I have changed a little, my temper has become bigger, I am ready to call names, and I am impatient with employees' mistakes. Why? I feel better than anyone else.

But with the growth of my age, especially the deepening of my career, I found myself wrong. First of all, with the development of society, it is an exaggeration to realize that one million in that year is not worth getting excited about. Nowadays, there are hundreds of millions of successful people in the society, and people are also very modest, doing social charity in obscurity and offering love. Besides, the value of life cannot be measured by simple value figures. Jiang XX, a former vice mayor of Suzhou, was greedy for hundreds of millions and sentenced to death. He is rich, but now he is a prisoner. Why, society spurns such so-called "rich and powerful" people. On the other hand, it was reported on the TV news the day before yesterday that a new Suzhou native found his wallet intact and returned it to Zhao. His behavior and spiritual realm are actually very rich.

of course, in today's competitive society, it is normal for young people to pay attention to packaging themselves in order to survive, but it is not good to make this packaging a trend. Many young people interviewed by me, who are in their twenties, are boasting about how much work experience they have, how much knowledge they know, how confident they are and how competent they are to the challenges of their work. In fact, you have only worked for a few years, and you have changed several units and learned some fur. You can't have high attainments. Just say that you have an understanding of a certain technology or knowledge, solved some problems, and have a little understanding. Why do you over-package yourself? You should know that "modest benefits are full of losses". If you talk too much, it means your ignorance and your naivety. You know the truth, but why is it so difficult to be "modest"? Do you think that if you are modest, others will despise yourself? No, modesty is a virtue, and it will not be out of date at any time or occasion. At least that's my opinion.

There is another phenomenon. At work, I often hear colleagues or friends talk about it. When I encounter a problem or a certain goal, I say it's all right. The Japanese often tell me that there is nothing wrong with China people, but there is something wrong with them. You haven't done your work yet, and many possible problems are still unknown. How can you jump to the conclusion that there is no problem? Maybe it's a habit, maybe it's a fear that others have no confidence in themselves, maybe it's to show their own grasp, maybe … However, in work and life, you will find that there are many, many problems hidden behind this problem. Just like the quality of products we usually encounter, we often encounter the influence of various factors such as materials, environment, machinery and personnel. Do you dare to easily waste the conclusion that "there is no problem"?

The young people can speak. Does this make people lose confidence? Are customers at ease if they are not confident? Is the leader at ease? That's true, but I think self-confidence is right. Otherwise, how to say "self-confidence for a hundred years" will be like hitting water for three thousand miles? But true self-confidence depends on your solid work. When you know the pass rate and corrective measures of each process like the back of your hand, you have confidence in improving quality. When you know the customer's business situation and market orders in time, you have confidence in the marketing business; When you master the skill level and psychological state of your subordinates, you have confidence in the delivery guarantee; When you have a vivid picture of what you have learned and the process of solving problems, you have confidence in your competence. In short, if you have laid a good foundation and have a bottom in your heart, then you will have confidence. Otherwise, your confidence is empty, irrelevant and divorced from reality. Besides, the world changes every day, and the market is also changing, and all kinds of factors have to be considered.

I'm a beginner for three years, and I'm lawless; After three years of intensive study, it is difficult to move. Don't say, I was hard to appear in those days, less puffed up, more cautious, and even a little too careful. Why? The reason is simple: there are mountains outside the mountains, and there are days outside. The journey is full of risks; Learning the sea is boundless, knowledge is boundless, and there are heroes ahead. Remember two circles in your heart, and life will be better.