Maybe someone can answer your question. He Chaovsky said that the composition should be written like "The Back".
So what is the "back"? Let's take a look.
I think my back is particularly handsome.
This is the first paragraph at the beginning of the composition. There are no superfluous words to embellish, but it looks so shocking.
Many times when we write a composition, we can't grasp the key points. Obviously, the title of the composition is Jasmine, but at the beginning, you have to write roses around a bend.
It is better to come straight to the point, and sometimes highlighting the key points is more conducive to the success of a composition.
Yes, many people write roses instead of jasmine at the beginning to better highlight the characteristics of jasmine, but it needs to be understood that the original writing skills are not so good, so why bother to gild the lily.
He Chaovsky once said, add what he said.
A successful composition is not always convincing because of its own views. To impress others with your own opinions, you should first quote some famous people's words, because their words are persuasive, so you can modify them on the basis of famous sayings. A description of more than a dozen words may be much better than your own long speech.
In addition, it can also reflect the writer's knowledge accumulation. Whether a person has read books or not and how many books he has read can be seen from his speech.
In other words, just a quotation adds a lot of color to this composition.
Of course, there are exceptions, such as the children who usually sit next to me.
When describing a thing, the writing angle can't just start from the thing itself. After all, everyone has a consensus on the back. It is obviously very difficult to reflect the difference of one's own back only from the back itself.
Therefore, we should use the writing technique of foil.
What do you mean? The purpose is to write about the difference of your back, so write about the difference of other things when facing your back. Under such a contrast, you will get unexpected results.
Finally, I can only express a little regret: if you don't love me, there will be no result.
Perhaps for the average writer, at the end, he will choose to emphasize his back again and be complacent after writing.
In fact, if you really write like this, even if the previous writing is no better, this composition has no appreciation value. This way of emphasizing is not as good as writing your own back differently.
Since you are writing a composition, you naturally can't end with an ending, giving the reader an imagination space. This is a clever way of writing.
Adding a sentence "Don't love me, no result" at the end gives readers a refreshing feeling?
At this time, the writer does not need to emphasize the key points of the article, and the readers can feel it themselves.