1+1=? Different people have different calculation methods, and the conclusions and answers they draw are also different. Mathematicians have spent half their lives trying to prove 1+1=2. Some people say: "1+1=3 is a writer. 1+1=2 is a mathematician. 1+1=0 is a philosopher." That’s right, mathematicians seek truth from facts, that’s why science cannot be false; writers like to modify the original story, exaggerate the facts, and write brilliantly; philosophers look at problems from both pros and cons, with both disadvantages and advantages. , so return to zero. Imagine writers, mathematicians, and philosophers sitting together and discussing 1+1=? When talking about a topic, I believe they will all come up with evidence that they think the answer is correct, but they are not convinced by each other. Based on the fact that they only look at the same problem from their own position, different positions will lead to different views, and different views will lead to different results. The same is true when looking at the entire society. Because different people handle a matter, the methods used may also be different, and the results may be even more different.

Think from someone else’s perspective, there are no absolutes in the world. Everything has two sides. When we encounter other people who have different opinions, we might as well put ourselves in their shoes, consider certain issues from the other person's point of view, and deal with the problem from the other person's point of view and the environment they are in. It is possible that some Some of the conflicts that we see as irreconcilable, when we are "overwhelmed by mountains and rivers, and there is no way out", because of our empathy, we have entered the realm of "a village with dark flowers and bright flowers".