Half-arm suits were quite popular in the early Tang Dynasty. On the mural of Princess Yongtai's tomb in Tang Dynasty, a maid-in-waiting of honor guard wore an arm and a half on her dress. The Tang Dynasty was an era of multi-cultures. At that time, women not only led the international fashion trend themselves, but also were good at drawing inspiration from the national costumes of the third world.

At a banquet, Princess Taiping wore a purple Hu suit, a jade belt around her waist and a black headscarf, and danced in front of Emperor Gaozong. Emperor Gaozong asked Princess Taiping with a smile: "Women can't be military officers. Why do you like wearing this kind of clothes, daughter? " It can be seen that the emperor also held an appreciative attitude and did not reprimand his daughter for not keeping etiquette.

Of course, not all have been forgiven. For example, Prime Minister Fang of Emperor Taizong thought that half-arms were "frivolous clothes", which was specially written into the family law and not worn. Another well-known minister, Ma Zhou, was considerate and sparse, demanding that no matter how ordinary people are, they can wear half an arm in addition to light clothes, thinking that such a dress is very appropriate.

Being able to put forward different opinions on a dress shows that the imperial court and men at that time were still very confident and did not think that the so-called "obedience to the demon" would lead to national subjugation-that was an excuse that their ancestors and future generations loved to find.

Television is the only thing left in our life.

If it weren't for these two recent events, I wouldn't know. It turns out that our life has long been so poor that only TV is left.

First, CCTV Children's Channel stopped broadcasting The Legend of Rainbow Cat and Lan Tu's Biography of Seven Chivalrous Men. It is said that netizens, headed by parents, criticized the drama for its foul language, violent plot and fear of teaching bad children, so they demanded to stop broadcasting with great fanfare. Subsequently, ten doctors collectively signed "to carry out the opposition with Yu Dan and others to the end" in the name of deviating from academics and approaching vulgarity, and asked her to leave the lecture hall and apologize to the audience.

What role does television play in our life? Why can an animation teach bad children? And a TV forum can mislead academics?

We never overestimate the influence of good film and television works on children. But if someone tells you to let your child watch an animated cartoon with all-round development in morality, intelligence and physique, he will become a child with all-round development in morality, intelligence and physique, you will definitely think this is a big talk. But why do children watch a movie that parents think is "foul-mouthed and violent" and be regarded as bad children? This can only make people feel that parents are looking for reasons to shirk their responsibilities. When a TV station broadcasts a problematic cartoon, it asks the TV station to stop broadcasting. If you happen to meet a neighbor who quarrels, curses and fights every day, do you want to learn from Meng Mu?

Besides watching TV, children actually have many things to do, such as reading, drawing, playing the piano and playing games with children. What's more, if you don't think this cartoon is good-looking, you can just pick a 100% healthy and excellent animated CD for your children to watch. I think when your children have regarded cartoons on TV as the main channel for growth and entertainment, it often means that the education of this parent has completely failed. There are countless things in life that are more interesting and instructive than TV. Do parents choose the most energy-efficient TV because of laziness or other reasons? First of all, parents lack responsibility.

Yu Dan also became popular because of the TV program "Lecture Room". I don't know how the doctor's thinking works, but I know a friend's junior high school children chose this way. After listening to Yu Dan's lecture, he became interested in The Analects. His mother bought him a pile of books about The Analects while the iron was hot. He flipped through it and found the book a bit shallow, not as interesting as Nan's The Analects. Look, in the eyes of a middle school student, Yu Dan is just an introduction, but she has aroused people's interest in Confucius and The Analects. It's like throwing a thread, everyone can climb it and get what they want.

But what about the doctor? They tried their best to unite across regions and schools to boycott Yu Dan, perhaps because they really felt that the academic community was irretrievably misread by Yu Dan. In other words, in their eyes, there is only one way for everyone to understand and learn from Confucius: Yu Dan in Lecture Room on TV.

In the past, ten doctors jointly canceled Christmas, and Liang Wendao once joked that they were stupid to study. Dr. Ten boycotted Yu Dan, which is nothing more than a collective stand-up to prove that reading can really make people stupid, so stupid that even a middle school student's judgment is worse. However, compared with the eagerness and sincerity of doctors' opposition, there is another explanation: their lives may be so poor that only TV is left.

Recently, film and television and the internet have jointly set off an upsurge of studying the history of Ming Dynasty. The pioneers are neither experts nor scholars. If we follow the thinking of Dr. Ten, scholars and experts in Ming history should wave sticks like them and shout and kill these popular non-expert scholars. I didn't expect that the response of the scholars of Ming history was not an attack, but a positive recognition and self-reflection. Zhang Xianqing, president of China Ming History Society, also said that the academic circles should reflect on the failure to let readers know the real Ming history.

Professor Yu Dan, like an expert in non-Ming history, opened an altar for literature professors and did the work of popularizing classical literature. She is not an expert, and her speech may have shortcomings and omissions, but her significance and contribution are undeniable. It should be these doctors who ignore common sense and wave sticks.

The distance of wealth

Gou Jian, the King of Yue, is a man who can only share weal and woe, but not be rich and strong. So he quietly left the country by boat after the king of Yue dominated. How clever Shi He is! See through the meanness of human nature early.

In fact, Yue Wang is not the only one who can't be rich. Even lovers often see the truth when they are in trouble. Once you are rich, won't you abandon your virtue?

Wealth is destructive, it is a natural isolation agent, and wealth has built a wall between two people in the form of various substances-

Be proud of being rich, and have independent material and spiritual space because of being rich. Therefore, far from the humility and loneliness in times of trouble, I am eager to find a reliable warmth and comfort; Therefore, the rich have their own selves and disdain to be completely exposed to another person. Your soul demands nobility because it has been trampled on for a long time. At this time, how can those hardships match your dignity?

I once read a cartoon: husband and wife are sitting on their knees, facing a plate with their only dinner on it. At this time, the distance between them is the closest. You can feed me, and I can feed you. Later, the two had a very simple dining table. Their life has improved. There is a plate of food in front of them, but they are still very close, because the cups and plates are staggered, and they can still touch their hands. By the third painting, their living conditions were getting better and better. The table is full of delicious food. The table is bigger, but they are farther away. The last painting made me sad: it was a long table with gorgeous candles lit on it, and all kinds of high-end tableware shone in the candlelight. Two people are at the two ends of the table, so far away that they can hardly see each other. Their sight was blocked by high-end tableware and food, and they would never meet again.

I am most willing to believe that eating is the most important activity between lovers. Only those who push me in the process of eating can best reflect the true feelings. But wealth makes this fun disappear. Food is too rich and life is too tasty. How can you let me and I let you have dinner together? It's hard to have a lover, so you should work hard on your mood. In the past years, because the selfless gift of a food stamp touched a teenager's heart, love was easily produced. How difficult it is to have love now! Because there is nothing to measure, you can't judge whether he is sincere or not. Especially now, many people don't want to be sincere-maybe I am wrong, and everyone still needs true feelings. Otherwise, why are there "knowing your heart and longing for a true feeling"?

Perhaps the simplest expression of love is eating, which I believe is the real reason why those couples who have difficulties can have strong feelings. Because they can water their love tree at will in a spoonful of food and drink. Why are the gifts of famous angels touching? Just because they are a couple in trouble. How do rich couples express their love? Of course, you can buy luxury sports cars and expensive diamond necklaces, but I always feel that the significance is not so profound. When the material reaches a certain level, happiness can no longer be improved. Similarly, when love has a rich coat, it can no longer continue to grow new feelings. This may be the reason why people keep pursuing new people. There is no kind element in love because of material lack, so it floats lightly.

When Yuan Chun was in the province, she was very sad. She felt that only a small family could enjoy family happiness, but when you are a concubine, this kind of meeting is extremely rare. It's raining with tears, and everyone is very sad.

Wealth is really an obstacle, especially when I see some mothers being cautious and passive towards their powerful son ... I think my mother once scolded him loudly when my son was young, because even the mother became so estranged because of wealth!

If we can always eat from a bowl, then we must be in love.