Is it true that there are filial sons under the sticks?
This view is incorrect. First of all, "a dutiful son is born under a stick" is some methods adopted at that time. For example, some words used to educate and teach children in China's history, such as "children from poor families take charge early", but now society will change. Even saying that the times are changing means that the teaching methods are also changing! Now some education experts say: children are not doing right and should be taught! Can't fight! Let him understand the truth! However, a few parents will really do this! Sometimes children can't stand being beaten, of course they will ask their parents! Why did you hit me? My parents say that I am kind to you and care about you! Under the stick comes a dutiful son! In this way, if you hit the child, it will not only be bad for the child! Instead, it hurts the child! Therefore, some previous education, now it seems, is even less suitable for modern children! And now some parents who prefer boys to girls are abusing their children, so use this sentence as their selfish shield! Children need guidance! You can call if you are wrong! I think this sentence is really a joke! Beating people is also a dutiful son! Han Feizi famously said, "A dutiful son does not love his father's family, and a loyal minister does not give birth to a sage." Actually, that's not what it means at all!