When people are old, what is really sad is not that they have no children, but that they have no money. I think it's right in a way. No matter whether you have children or not, you won't be too happy without money. Because I haven't experienced that era after all, and I can't understand how happy children of four generations are. I can only look at it from my present point of view. Everything is fake, only money is real.

If your children are filial and willing to support you wholeheartedly when you are old, without any complaints, then I don't think it is very important to have money, but after all, there is no filial son before going to bed for a long time. If you have any illness, they will inevitably complain after a long time. Do you feel like a problem at this time? Do you feel like a burden?

Being rich is like having a baby. Money is the source of happiness. Whether your children care about you or not, you have enough money to take care of yourself. What's so sad about this? Isn't it a happy thing that people can do whatever they want when they are old? Whether you agree with this statement or not, money is really omnipotent in modern times, people will be biased, and money is cold and fair.

If I have to choose a pair of filial sons and daughters and enough money to support the elderly, I will definitely choose money, because filial sons and daughters may be unfilial, but money is always money. After the children get married, the old man becomes an outsider, and it will be inconvenient to rely on his family for a long time. But the money is different. Money is the right to speak and money represents independence. This sentence also applies to the elderly. Money has loneliness, and I'd rather be lonely.