First narrate and then discuss, from fact to fiction, from matter to reason, which embodies the principle of presenting facts and reasoning. This way, reading is friendly, natural and logical; even if it is a criticism, it is all facts and ironclad evidence. Like a mountain, it makes the opponent irrefutable.

Furthermore, "preface to narrate" is also a simple way to create a scene and attract everyone. Through "preface to narrate" or outline the image. Either present facts or state arguments to arouse the reader's interest and attention, thereby attracting the reader to the "post-discussion" track.

A mix of narratives and discussions. The discussion is timely and quick, making it easy to take advantage of opportunities to attack weak points. At the same time, it can make the article appear dense, coherent, coherent, ups and downs, and relaxed. Interpretation and discussion can be roughly divided into two situations: First, in the same paragraph, discussion is carried out while narrating, and discussion follows the narration. This is interstatement and discussion.

Discuss first and then describe. It is relatively rare in essays to simply discuss first and then narrate. Those that are followed by narrative are often narrated and discussed in the previous article, with the discussion as the main focus, and the narrative at the end is written with notes to speak with facts and support arguments. The purpose of its writing is that "facts speak louder than words" and to use facts to give the opponent a "turnaround" in the final round.

Extended information

Narrative method

1. Summary method. That is, using concise language to summarize the event itself or the process to facilitate discussion. This method is more common. For example, there is an article "The Disadvantages of Applause" that begins with: "Watching a play in the theater, when the actors reach the key points of their singing, the audience can't help but respond with a burst of applause. For the actors and the audience, this is the same thing. This is a normal communication.

But the applause must be given at the right time, for what it is, and even for the amount of it. If it is inappropriate, it will be a waste of time. But applause should always be given at the right time, for the right event, and even for the right amount. If it is inappropriate, it will lead to malpractice." Starting from this point, it feels natural and appropriate.

2. Excerpt method. That is, directly excerpt the relevant language of the characters during the occurrence of the event, omitting the description of the event itself, and the extracted language of the characters is directly related to the argument.

For example, there is an article "Those who flatter me are my thieves" were started with this method: "It is said that Comrade Guo Moruo often used this motto to encourage scientists during his lifetime: 'I am a Taoist. Those who are evil are my teachers, those who teach me good are my friends, and those who flatter me are my thieves. It is not difficult for people to understand this truth, but it is not easy to follow it. People feel simple and lively.