What happened? We can't rule the case by speculation like that judge without evidence! Here I can only raise a few questions about the case from the verdict to when I heard Peng Yu admitted that he hit someone 10 years later.

First of all, the most important question is that ordinary people know that "based on facts" Taking the law as the criterion, "As a certified judge, he used his own speculation and common sense to decide the case: "If you didn't hit me, why did you help him?" He also sent him to the hospital and paid for it. This is obviously abnormal and he is so speculative. Why not speculate on the reason why the police lost the transcript based on the occupation of the plaintiff’s son?

The second Peng Yu admitted that he hit someone. Before the second trial, the two parties settled out of court. Peng Yu compensated the plaintiff 10,000 yuan and the two parties signed the agreement and kept secret about the matter. It was only ten years later that the news came from someone in the judicial circle. There is another question here when someone’s personal affairs are made public. (1) Even if the plaintiff was really hit, let’s not talk about the medical expenses. The single-trial verdict is recognized as unfair. Although the plaintiff won the case, the pressure of public opinion will not damage her reputation. Yuan can calm down, right? Will the plaintiff settle easily?

(2) General laws are all about "fairness, justice and openness", not to mention such an important case that everyone is paying attention to. Since the plaintiff admitted that he hit someone, why did both parties have to sign a confidentiality agreement at that time? Why wasn't it made public at that time? Isn't this a hasty case, and it is suspected of covering up the situation between the superiors and the inferiors?

(3) After ten years, the plaintiff died and the defendant disappeared. Why was it made public by a certain person in the judiciary? Is it because of the current social phenomenon of not being able to help the elderly when they see them falling? Point the finger at the improper verdict that year?