In daily study, work and life, many people have had the experience of writing, and they are all familiar with writing. Writing is a transition from internal speech to external speech, that is, from a compressed, concise language that they can understand to an external language form that has a standardized grammatical structure and can be understood by others. So have you ever learned anything about composition? The following is my collection of interesting debating compositions, welcome to share. Interesting debate composition 1
I've always wanted to see a real field debate. This time I finally realized my wish, because after learning the course objectives, the teacher also organized a debate.
Our theme is: "Is the examination paper useful?".
After the teacher called the roll, six debaters stepped onto the platform, separated on both sides, and started the debate.
In the first round, some of the six contestants used some well-known ideas to demonstrate their views, while others chose some examples from their own lives to demonstrate. Although the debate has been progressing, they may not be well prepared.
Plus, they have never debated on stage, and their voices are not loud, and their speech speed is a little too fast, so we can't hear them clearly with bated breath.
Among the six debaters, Jiayi impressed me the most. Because in the second round of debate, only she dared to refute. She used "nutrition has expired", which strongly hit back at Shen Yi's famous saying that "books are the nutrition of the whole world". This makes everyone feel refreshed.
after the second round of the debate, we can't go on. So the teacher made a summary. She said that reading the right book in the right time, in the right place and in the right way is definitely beneficial, otherwise it may not be beneficial. I hope the students can open their books well ...
In this debate, although there is no fierce scene of acrimony and tit-for-tat that I saw on TV, it is the beginning for us to step onto the platform. I believe that after studying hard and practicing hard, we will definitely make further progress. Interesting Debate Composition 2
Today, we held a special debate. The teacher divided the students into two groups. Boys are in favor, agreeing that the advantages of the Internet outweigh the disadvantages, while girls are in opposition, agreeing that the disadvantages of the Internet outweigh the advantages. After the teacher finished his speech, a heated debate began.
The discussion in the group was fierce. Both sides talked endlessly and talked a lot. After a while, the teacher said, "Let's give you the next time, please show your opinions and point out the defects in the other side's views. Ok, let's start!"
The teacher writes the right and wrong on the left and right sides of the blackboard. The positive side argued: "I am only positive, and I think the advantages of the network outweigh the disadvantages." The benefits brought by the network are numerous, and the appearance of the network is a sign of the progress of modern society and the development of science and technology.
After hearing the positive speech, the opposing party immediately stood up and retorted: "Although this is true, some unhealthy websites are very harmful to students and will affect our physical and mental health. Indulging in computers for a long time will cause myopia in the eyes and cause serious consequences. "
pros and cons: "Those who are hurt by the Internet are all personal, and they only blame themselves for not using it correctly. The Internet has provided convenience for people, narrowed the distance of the world, and added another tool for communication. We should use it correctly!"
after hearing the second argument, the opposing party frowned and said, "However, under the influence of bad information, some students went straight ahead and embarked on the criminal road of theft and robbery, and even killed or committed suicide. Therefore, we believe that the disadvantages of the network outweigh the advantages. "
the other side is still arguing endlessly, and each side has its own views. In the end, everyone came to the conclusion that the computer is a window for us to know the world, so we can contact it. However, because computers are geared to the whole society, there will naturally be some things that are not suitable for primary school students. Therefore, no matter whether the advantages of the network outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages, we should have a choice, use it correctly and moderately.
Grade 5: _ Xixi Interesting Debate Composition 3
In the fourth week of school, all the teachers and students of our Grade 5 group held a special debate in the multi-functional hall, and the topic of the debate was "Is it beneficial to open books?"
The participants in this debate are four classes in Grade Five. There are four debaters in each class. All of them are well dressed and fully prepared. The cheerleaders in the audience are also very excited. When they are introduced to their class, they shout out slogans loudly and show their own brands, clappers and some ribbons.
After the host introduced the special guests, parents' representatives and the rules of the competition, the first debate officially kicked off. The first match between Class 13 and Class 4 was wonderful. As soon as the positive debater's voice fell, the opposing side immediately stood up, especially during the free debate, the opposing side immediately stood up to refute, and both sides were not to be outdone. The first game was bound to be applauded by us. The second debate was between us and Class One. We were in favor. First, we argued about Chen Huiwen's point of view. We all applauded her for her very good. At this time, the opposing side stood up and said, "What's the benefit of some people reading casually?" As soon as the voice fell, we stood up and said, "This is a personal problem." The opposing side was stupid for a moment, but it quickly reacted and immediately said, "If everyone reads a crime-solving novel at the same time, they all learn bad things, is it still a personal problem?" At this time, we just sat there like idiots, and we were all worried about our debaters! At this time, Liu Jinghan suddenly stood up and said, "This is because the people who read books are not in the right state of mind, and they can't blame the books. Can someone blame the knife for killing people?" The students cheered straight and showed their signs. A stone in my heart finally fell to the ground, but it was led away by the opposing side. Finally, thanks to Zhang Xirui's determination, she jumped out of the trap. She loudly said, "As the saying goes, there is a golden house in the book, and there is a Yan Ruyu in the book ..." It pulled us back, otherwise, it would be changed into a mud pit, and the second debate ended with our applause. Interesting Debate Composition 4
This time, our class held a very interesting "Debate Competition"-the second class this afternoon. The theme of this debate is: telling honest and white lies. Don't mention how interesting, how funny!
let me explain it to you in detail first. The pros support honesty, while the cons support white lies. In this way, the positive side should collect information about honesty, and the negative side should collect information about white lies.
"Ding Rinrin ... Ding Rinrin ..." The bell rang in the second class. I am very excited in my heart, because the only "debate competition" is about to begin!
"ok, I declare-the debate is now officially started!" " Small host Yuan Yunlong said. When he finished, there was applause from the teacher.
"Now, please argue for Chen Jintao's honest opinion." The little host is humanitarian. "There is no doubt that a white lie is a lie in itself. Lying is cheating, cheating is immoral, no ... "Chen Jintao replied forcefully. "Well, Chen Jintao told us vividly the difference between honesty and white lies, and so on. Now, please ask Yang Yukai, the opposing party, to give us a statement. "
"hello, everyone! I think a white lie is a lie, but it is preceded by the word' white'. Therefore, I think there are two kinds of lies: one is good and the other is malicious. Therefore, we can't exclude it. I think there can be no white lies in life. " Yang Yukai said with relish.
in this way, the arguments for the four arguments and the arguments against the four arguments have all been discussed. Among them, I think Zhu Yuesha said it best!
As soon as she appeared on the stage-holding her head proudly and gesticulating with her fingers, she knew at a glance that she was a proud person. "I think ..." After a long time, she finally finished. At this time, our whole class, including the teacher, was infected by his language. Everyone clapped their "golden palms".
"Ding Rinrin-Ding Rinrin-"It turned out that the bell rang. Alas! This debate ended like this. This is really an interesting "debate contest", which benefited me a lot. Interesting Debate Composition 5
In the second class this afternoon, our class held a debate contest. The topic of the debate is "opening books is beneficial", Xu Shenjun is in the affirmative and Huang Ziyin is in the negative. Everyone has made full preparations for this debate, and as an opponent, I have also looked up a lot of information to prove that "opening books may not be beneficial."
The debate began. First, Huang Ziyin made a speech: "I think it is beneficial to open books. Isn't it just for us that people invented high-tech such as laptops?" As soon as Huang Ziyin finished speaking, Xu Shenjun began to refute: "I object to Huang Ziyin's view. If high technology is used to do these things, don't we understand our own strength?" Isn't the exam just to test what you have learned? " In this way, the two of them fought for several rounds. Li Rui, the opponent, found that Huang Ziyin could not resist Xu Shenjun's serial attacks gradually, so he stepped forward and said, "I agree with Huang Ziyin's view that using a laptop can make us all get 1 points." They bullied more than I could stand: "If high technology can do this kind of thing, just sit on the sofa at home and learn the computer well, or just implant a chip in your brain?" Unexpectedly, my words made them speechless.
In the end, Zhengfang won. Everyone thinks this debate is very meaningful. In any case, everyone should study hard and learn knowledge well. Interesting Debate Composition 6
This time, our class held a very interesting "Debate Competition"-the second class this afternoon. The theme of this debate is: telling honest and white lies. Don't mention how interesting, how funny!
let me explain it to you in detail first. The pros support honesty, while the cons support white lies. In this way, the positive side should collect information about honesty, and the negative side should collect information about white lies.
"Ding Rinrin. Ding Rinrin. " The bell rang for the second class. I am very excited in my heart, because the only "debate competition" is about to begin!
"ok, I declare-the debate is now officially started!" " Little host, I said. After that, there was a burst of applause from the teacher.
"Now, please argue with Fan Miaomiao about honesty." I said. "There is no doubt that a white lie is a lie in itself. Lying is cheating, cheating is immoral,no. " Fan Miaomiao replied forcefully. "Well, she told us vividly the difference between telling honesty and telling white lies, and so on. Now, please ask the opposing party to argue that john young will give us a statement. "
"hello, everyone! I think a white lie is a lie, but it is preceded by the word' white'. Therefore, I think there are two kinds of lies: one is good and the other is malicious. Therefore, we can't exclude it. I think there can be no white lies in life. " John young said with relish.
in this way, the arguments for the four arguments and the arguments against the four arguments have all been discussed. Among them, I think Hu Chuanya said it best!
As soon as he entered the arena-holding his head proudly and gesticulating with his fingers, he knew at a glance that he was a proud man. "I think." After a long time, he finally finished. At this time, our whole class, including Mr. Zhou, was infected by his language. Everyone clapped their "golden palms".
"Ding Rinrin-Ding Rinrin-"It turned out that the bell rang. Alas! This debate ended like this. However, our "debate contest" has convinced me and satisfied me. Interesting Debate Composition 7
People often say: "Open books are beneficial, full of poetry, temperament and elegance." It is true that good books can benefit people all their lives, but reading unhealthy books is harmful.
On this day, the teacher held a special debate in the second class. As soon as the bell rang, everyone sat down in their seats. At the teacher's command, the debate began. When I saw that our scores were scarce and the square was outnumbered, I showed a triumphant expression. The representative of the debater stood up and said: We insist that it is beneficial to open books. For example, Zhou Enlai, Mao Zedong and others are knowledgeable only by reading every day. Of course, I am the representative of the opposing side. I said not to be outdone: I don't think it is necessarily beneficial to open books. Liu Xiang once said: "Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools." But there are two kinds of medicine, one is good medicine, which can practice medicine and cure diseases, and the other is poison, which can kill people. Therefore, we insist that opening books may not be beneficial. The debater in the affirmative replied that Shakespeare once said, "Books are the nourishment of the whole world." We had a brainwave: what if it is expired nutrition? We laughed.
after a verbal battle, we both lost each other, and our saliva dried up, but we haven't decided a winner yet. The teacher announced that the discussion meeting was over, but it has just reached its climax, and we are very reluctant to part with it.
This debate has made me understand that everything has a truth, whether it is beneficial to open books or not. Interesting Debate Composition 8
On Wednesday, our class held an interesting debate.
the contents of the debate contest are "opening books is beneficial" and "opening books is not necessarily beneficial". My group is square, which means "opening books is beneficial" The debate began. Our captain is Zhou Ziqi. Zhou Ziqi said, "Books can nourish people's hearts, and books can purify people's hearts ..." Wang Shulin, the captain of the opposing side, immediately retorted, "Although books are good, they are also divided into good books and bad books. If you read bad books, it may not be beneficial to open them." Luo Jiaqin said: "Although books are divided into good books and bad books, as long as you read more books, you can tell the difference between good books and bad books." Peng Beini immediately told a story: "There was a general in Zhao Guo named Zhao Bao, who only talked on paper and made a clear statement, but in reality, his lack of practice made Zhao Guo lose 4 million troops." Zhang Xinyi retorted: "Lin Haiyin, the author in the first lesson of the Chinese book we studied, became a famous writer because she loved reading when she was a child." ............. Finally, under the debate of two captains, the debate ended.
I think it's beneficial to open books. Books are our spiritual food, our wings to travel and learn, and our beacon to the future. Books are our intimate friends, and books are our mentors and friends, so we should read more and read good books. Interesting Debate Composition 9
Today, the teacher suddenly made an interesting request to us-to hold a debate tomorrow, which made everyone very happy. It has never been held before, and I don't know what the debate will be like. The debate is divided into two camps, men's and women's. Each side chooses four representatives, and the topic is playing the net.