To say "the law is the law and morality is the morality" is a seemingly reasonable statement, but in reality it is a perverse logic. Here, I dare to ask what is truth? Reason can only be called reasonable if most people think it is fair. If something is done that violates moral values, people will think it is unfair, and it should not be called reasonable. Reason, if it is separated from morality or violates morality, people will feel unfair. Therefore, reason and morality are connected, they are brothers, and they grow within the same framework. So what is Dharma? The law is a kind of restraint against those who are unreasonable and do things contrary to the principles. That is to say, people are not allowed to do things that go against the principles. This is called the Dharma. Therefore, the law cannot be separated from reason, let alone morality. Legislators must consider that laws are based on morality. Once legislation is divorced from morality, it will be unpopular with the people. Some people in the management force insist on separating law and morality, and they call it the rule of law and the rule of law. Regardless of whether things are moral or not, only the "laws" determined by the management are used to sanction them. Anyone who dares to disobey will be sanctioned. This is an effective management. But I think this is an ineffective management and an ineffective legal system. Qin Shihuang, the earliest emperor of China, used this kind of ineffective management to push Chen Sheng and Wu Guang into the records of history, and he himself was knocked down. Therefore, the statement "the law is law and morality is morality" is a kind of forced rule of law. He has stolen the word "reason". So I say he is a kind of robber Luoji.

I once heard a successful entrepreneur say, "The poor are poor because they are too lazy." I asked him on my mobile phone that farmers go to the soil in the middle of the night to dig for food 365 days a year. Are they lazy? Migrant workers work more than ten hours a day at construction sites regardless of wind, frost, rain, snow or scorching sun, sleeping in wooden houses and eating rough food. Are they lazy? Children in remote mountainous areas have to cut firewood, make food, and herd sheep and cattle since they are seven or eight years old. They wear plastic slippers in the snow, and sometimes carry younger siblings on their backs. Are they lazy? Open your eyes again and take a look at the sanitation workers around you. They are busy working regardless of the weather, rain or shine. Are they lazy...? But they are poor. Don’t you think it’s a bit guilty for you to blindly accuse them of being “lazy” when they are already weighed down by the burden of life? So what kind of "diligence" do you want them to have? As the saying goes, standing and speaking will not hurt your back, but I think it will hurt your heart to speak with squinted eyes.

There are many examples!

1) Burning straw is environmental pollution. In fact, the air pollutants produced by burning straw are negligible. Mainly burning coal, car exhaust, corporate sewage, etc.!

2)

Cremation! Pollute the environment, organic matter instantly turns into ash and inorganic matter, and more than 4 billion years of evolution have been It has been destroyed and the ecological cycle has been destroyed!

3) Health care products! All the health care products are promoted in a clear and logical way, but the results are not visible!

In fact, there are many, many, many. Tell other netizens!

Brain short-circuit fallacies are everywhere!

In daily life, the illogical fallacy of a short-circuited bandit is always around you and is used as a motto:

1) Don’t do to others what you don’t want others to do. .

(Explanation 1: Judge, if you don’t want to go to jail yourself, you can’t sentence others).

(Explanation 2: Whatever you want, you must give it to others).

(Example 3: I want to beat you, so I will do it to you).

2) Kill the chicken and show it to the monkey!

Why kill the chicken? Is it a crime to kill a chicken?

Who among the rooster and the monkey is guilty of the crime that deserves to be killed?

Why show it to the monkey? Did the monkey commit a crime? If the monkey commits a crime, why not kill the monkey instead of the chicken? Was it a deliberate attempt to create an unjust case?

Killing the chicken to show the monkey, this kind of seriously mentally ill logic can only be thought of by a highly mentally disturbed person!

3), kill one to serve as a warning to others

Why kill one? Was he supposed to kill a hundred people, but only one was killed?

Shouldn’t everyone be killed, but one person should be killed to achieve a terrifying effect?

4) Use heavy scriptures in troubled times!

What does Dianzhang do on a daily basis?

Why do we use allusions when the world is in chaos? Why do we need to use Chongdian because of chaos? Is the misuse of Chongdian an excuse for abuse of Chongdian? Or is it to expand the reasons for indiscriminate punishment in the name of the law?

5) Show mercy outside the law!

What do you want the law for? Why should we show mercy outside the law? Is the power that has the power to show mercy greater than the law? Or is love greater than law? Where is the equality, fairness and impartiality of the law?

6) Keep people under the knife

Those who deserve to be killed must be guilty of killing. Since it is a capital crime, why should we keep people who deserve to be killed?

Why should we kill people who should not be killed? Is there another grievance? Since the case has not been brought to a clear trial, why should he be put to death?

Is law child's play?

Let me tell you a joke. Three people went out to do business together. They put the copper coins together and took turns carrying them. One day when they saw a park, the three of them handed the money bags to the gatekeeper. , please take care of his pocket until all three of us are here. You can give it to us. Not long after we entered, we saw a pond with very good water. Someone suggested that we wash our hair together. Some people say that we don’t have a wooden comb, what should we do after washing. One of them said that I should borrow it from the doorman. The man came to the door and yelled at the two people that he would not give it to me. The two people waved at the old man and shouted, "Give it to him." As a result, the man took the money bag and ran away. The two men negotiated with the old man and said, "We asked you to lend us the wooden comb. How could you take the money away from him?" In the end, the lawsuit went to the county government. The county magistrate judged that the old man at the door must compensate the two of them. The old man was walking down the street dejectedly when he met a seven-year-old child who asked the old man why he was unhappy and looked sad. The old man thought that the county magistrate had already sentenced him, so what's the use of telling you a child? The child keeps asking, tell me, maybe I can help you? In the end, the old man really didn't have to pay. The child told the old man that the money was still with me, but two of you couldn't come to get it. You had to come together as three of you before I could give it to you.

The world is not lacking in black humor. I heard some time ago that a father beat his own teenage son to death in a certain village. When the police came to arrest him, he told them calmly that his son always caused trouble for the family by being naughty and disobedient, and that he was beaten to death to eliminate the source of trouble. When he was arrested, he shouted: This is our family matter, you have no right to arrest me. This reminds me of the word "sovereignty". Everyone in this world recognizes that the world is a global village. Are there rules that are universally recognized by the world? If everyone does not abide by the rules and breaks them wantonly, and also raises the flag of "sovereignty" and does not allow others to interfere. I really don’t know where the human world will go? .

Giving money to foreigners is for ridiculous international relations. Money is given to Chinese people and divided into three, six or nine grades. The second generation of red officials and second generations should share the dividends from me, but it should not be given to the common people. , everyone has money, who will work as a slave to the officials? Harmony is a mess, but the reports are full of flowers. What is a well-off society? People don’t understand. They only know the policy of not encountering pitfalls, but watching TV says it is necessary. We have achieved a moderately prosperous life in all respects, so don’t make up any more. History always has its summary.

I feel deeply about this!

The first sentence,

If the leading cadres want to punish you,

and there is no legitimate reason,

they will throw out the officialdom sentence Wise words from the Internet:

"You must have an overall view"!

This sentence has almost become the exclusive official language used by leading cadres to attack and demean their subordinates in officialdom!

No subordinate dares to refute!

The most annoying and resentful thing is:

Knowing clearly that it is the fault of the leading cadres and deliberately embarrassing or framed, but they are said to be high-sounding and politically correct by the leading cadres!

The most shameless thing in the world is this!

The second sentence: "It's all for your own good"!

Teachers often say this to students! Everyone should have experienced it!

Parents often say this to their children!

The third sentence: "Don't let your children lose at the starting line"!

What teachers often say to parents!

Advertising slogans often promoted by businesses to parents!

Huawei has a high proportion of overseas sales: it makes money abroad and is a source of national pride;

Xiaomi has a high proportion of overseas sales: it is not good at home and the Chinese people hate it.

Xiaomi has a rich product line: a large grocery store that sells everything;

Huawei follows suit: it has strong R&D capabilities and rich products.

Xiaomi pays patent fees to Qualcomm: Qualcomm’s godson has no strength and can only hold on to its thighs;

Huawei pays patent fees to Qualcomm: respect intellectual property rights and be responsible.

Xiaomi did not collect patent fees from Huawei: It is not capable enough, so the loser still wants to collect patent fees?

Huawei did not charge Xiaomi’s patent fees: The national hero is so impressive, he should still charge a certain amount, Xiaomi is too clueless...

Generals and soldiers do different jobs, and their salaries are different. . Why do teachers have different salaries for doing the same job? And junior teachers do more than senior teachers. The sale of certificates and professional titles has enabled corrupt officials and eliminated scientists. The evaluation of professional titles is purely based on who can commit fraud, who has a large network of connections, and who has great power. There is no way to tell how good someone is at teaching and educating people! Those who are rated as senior are either leaders, or they have cobbled together some false and empty so-called papers on the Internet. Once they are rated as senior, they find ways to find excuses to do other things, and start to mess around and do less. The salary is higher than others. Can this kind of job evaluation have a positive effect? China's teacher evaluation is a shameless and cruel sharp knife that kills the enthusiasm of those hardworking and honest teachers on the front line! There is absolutely no fairness or justice in the job evaluation, only darkness, filth and shamelessness! Because job evaluations set various restrictions, ostensibly to select the best, but in fact it is to open the door to power. They can use their power to first let themselves and those who have relationships with them be evaluated, and more importantly, You can charge a benefit fee! They are good at building relationships, looking for backdoors, and giving and accepting bribes. This is the core of the problem. Looking at the education world, there are many books that teach like shit, but they are advanced. This is the effect of professional evaluation! Vocational evaluation has no effect on improving education and teaching! Instead, the education world is plunged into darkness! ! !