Does the questioner want to ask "What are the similarities and differences between "Everyone can be intolerant" and "Pity is human nature"?

1. Similarities: The intolerance mentioned by Mencius and the compassion described by Rousseau are both emotions that precede reason and are part of human nature.

2. Differences: different ways of argumentation, and different positions in their thinking systems. First of all, in "Intolerance", Mencius did not rigorously demonstrate that people are intolerant, but ended the argument with a few examples; on the contrary, in "Pity", Rousseau very systematically demonstrated theoretically Compassion is human nature and compassion is innate. Secondly, the position in the article that everyone has an intolerance is the cornerstone of the policy of not recognizing others, and that everyone has an intolerance is to elicit and demonstrate the need to implement a policy of intolerance.