They use machines to produce goods.
So a large number of products were produced. They can't sell all the goods locally
So they need overseas markets. meanwhile
Because of the use of machines, they can produce goods on a large scale.
Need a lot of raw materials. But some countries just fight for colonies to show their strength. To sum up the above is just to make their country strong. About Balkons (balkans)
1 Austria-Hungary and Russia
Serbia wants to expand their influence in the Balkans, so their national interests are challenged by the other side.
That led to humiliation.
As Austria-Hungary and Russia are in different camps, war is likely to break out.
Their bad relationship led to the bad relationship of their camp (Austria-Hungary is on the German side)
Russia is on the French side.
Deteriorate the relationship between France and Germany)
They formed an alliance. They became reluctant to settle the dispute peacefully. War may happen, and the Bosnian crisis and Balkan war have worsened the relationship between Australia, Hungary and Serbia. That leads to the Sarajevo Association-the event leads to the World War12007-1-0410: 37: 58 Supplement: Sorry.
The word' humiliatio' should be' humiliation' 2007-11-0410: 38: 58 Supplement: Sorry.
The word "humiliatio" should be "humiliation"
Reference: I
To a certain extent.
Because there were many factors leading to World War I, the outbreak of World War I occurred in 19 14 to 19 18. This is a great war in the early 20th century. There are five factors: alliance system; Arms race; Colonial and economic hatred; Extreme nationalism and the fuse-Serreli incident. Now analyze the following points. First, the alliance system. The alliance system was initiated by Bismarck to isolate France. however
Through 1907
The alliance system divided Europe into two camps-triple alliance and the Three Kingdoms Agreement. If members of the two camps suddenly clash,
therefore
A regional war turned into a world war. The second is the arms race, which is triggered by the formation of the alliance system.
The purpose is to strengthen the armament of the incident.
Maintain national security. The arms race has greatly increased the weapons, forces and fleets of European countries.
In particular, Britain and Germany compete for maritime hegemony, so that when disputes arise, countries will not easily give in.
Promote the formation of a world war. The third is colonialism and economic hatred. The purpose of colonization and economic hatred is to compete for raw materials and markets in Asia and Africa. The fiercest one was that Germany and France competed for Morocco in Africa. Conflicts caused by economy and colonialism.
Relations between European powers have been deteriorating.
Eventually led to the outbreak of the First World War. The fourth is extreme nationalism. The purpose of extreme nationalism is to establish power in a powerful country.
National struggle. One of them is that Russia advocates "pan-Slavism".
Contradictions between great powers
It triggered several international crises in Africa and the Balkans, and finally led to the outbreak of war. _ _ _ _ _ _ Germany's responsibility in the First World War? At the end of World War I, a committee investigating the responsibility of war creators submitted its report. It pointed out that the war crime trafficking clause should be added to Article 23 1 of the Treaty of Versailles. According to the report, "the Axis countries and their allies Turkey and Bulgaria have long planned to wage war, and their actions make war inevitable. The agreement between Germany and Austria intentionally undermined the compromise proposed by the three countries. " Germans can't participate in the decision of this Committee. These are the views expressed by the Allies. Obviously, a passage in the treaty is not enough to solve historical problems, nor can it be used as a reasonable judgment. If we want to consider crimes or disputes, criminals will never have to take full responsibility for the events. He doesn't have to be personally responsible. This problem of responsibility distribution is more obvious in the international crisis. If we want to find out to what extent Germany caused the war, we must carefully consider the causes of the war. Because if the background is ignored, the view is unfair. Generally speaking, there are many distant causes of world war: imperialism and economic competition, European Union system, arms race and aggressive nationalism. Allies and Axis countries are involved in these factors. Most international disputes come from imperialism and economic competition. The struggle between France and Germany in Moro, the struggle between Russia and Austria in the Balkans, the struggle between Germany and other big countries in Turkey and so on. These struggles pose a threat to peace in Europe. It is difficult for us to draw conclusions about any participant and evaluate his hostility and responsibility for causing the crisis. However, as a country without colonies, Germany's colonial strategy is very rude. Around 1907, Europe was divided into two camps, namely triple alliance and triple alliance. Bismarck initiated the European Union system. The alliance system, whether it is the first alliance or the anti-alliance, is defensive in nature, but it eventually creates an atmosphere of war clouds. This is because big countries believe that if they are attacked, they will definitely get help from their allies. In this way, in the conflict between countries, everyone is unwilling to give in. With the rise of alliance system and the fear brought by this system, a huge arms race is coming. The demand for huge armaments is nominally based on peace, because everyone thinks that the best way to deal with war is national defense armaments. On the whole, Germany stood out against land disarmament, while Britain blocked all steps that would weaken her control over the ocean. To a certain extent, every country, especially Germany, has contributed to the growth of armaments, which has developed into a spirit that can be described in one word: militarism. In the twentieth century, nationalism instilled a sense and feeling in Europe, which consolidated the background of war. Extreme nationalism prevailed at that time. Europeans began to feel that everything that * * * did with other countries was right. The strongest advocates of the sense of national superiority are those newly unified countries, and all countries, especially Germany, suffer from it. Germany's economic and naval strength has developed rapidly, and it has reached the point where its neighbors are wary. Her tough foreign policy frightened other countries and gave them no illusions of reconciliation. Bismarck annexed Alsace and Lorraine in 187 1, which seriously undermined international peace. The problems of Alsace and Lorraine poisoned the relationship between France and Germany and increased the pain felt between the two peoples. The basic factors of war listed above show that not only Germany, but also other countries should be responsible for the outbreak of war. Modern writers believe that Germany is not innocent, but the crime is not as big as that accused by the powers. Obviously, the conclusion that Germany is the only guilty country is incorrect. In any case, if we carefully study the recent causes of the war, we will find that Germany needs to bear greater responsibility for the war. 19 14 The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand and his wife in Sarajevo, the capital of Bosnia, on June 28th was an event that triggered the war. In fact, there is no internal reason why this incident led to the war between Austria and Serbia. Austria's action is based on Vienna's policy. Austria-Hungary consulted her allies and learned that Germany would fully support any action of Austria. This promise was later called Germany's blank check to Austria. Under such circumstances, Germany released the strong horse racing. Austria immediately drafted a final draft that it found unacceptable and handed it to the Serbs. However, Serbia's answer was unexpectedly warm and sincere. Even so, Austria-Hungary thought it was a very disappointing answer. She then severed diplomatic relations with Serbia and declared war. No one doubts that Germany really encouraged Austria-Hungary to take military action against Serbia, a small empire. We have reason to believe that if Austria had not been encouraged by Germany at the beginning of the crisis, she would never have dared to behave so uncompromisingly in the following days. Later, Germany may want to influence Russia's actions, but it is too late and useless. Moreover, Germany also put pressure on Austria, prompting the latter to tend to modify and compromise. Undoubtedly, seeing Germany's determination to support its allies and Austria-Hungary's will to destroy Serbia, Russia had to step forward and become the first country to send troops. This kind of transfer will inevitably have a bad influence on officials in other countries. On the other hand, Germany is obviously the first country to declare war on other countries. This naturally turned the Ossetian War into a major conflict between European countries. As far as the spread of war, the combination of East-West conflict and the destruction of Balkan war regionalization are concerned, Germany's alliance system and German policy should bear a particularly great responsibility in promoting the coming of war. In addition, Germany's cynical decision violated the solemn international commitments announced in the London Treaty 1839. The invasion of Belgium means that Germany lost its moral support from the beginning, while the western powers gained moral support in their firm stance against the German invasion. From the above analysis, it can be seen that in the final stage, the responsibility of the war should fall on the axis countries. There is no doubt that Germany has known and approved Austria's final notice to Serbia, which is the first crime. This has reduced Russia's desire not to participate in the Ossetian war and to limit it to a certain region. The second crime is that Germany sent the last obituaries to Russia and France. Although the last series of events cannot explain the cause of the war, Germany's uncompromising attitude is more responsible than other European countries. Weighing the above arguments, a fair conclusion is that Germany's war responsibility is dominated by a universal responsibility-all European powers are responsible for the absence of * * * doctrine in Europe. Dixon has clearly pointed out that this is a "state of international non-ism". Without any effective international organization invading the country, world war is inevitable. All European countries are guilty, but Germany is more guilty of the outbreak of war than any other country. Finally, the fuse-the Selali incident. The Selali incident took place on June 28th, 2004.
Crown Prince Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary paid an official visit to Sarajevo. Unfortunately,
Archduke Ferdinand and his Austro-Hungarian royal wife were assassinated. This is the well-known Selali incident. A month after the incident, it triggered a world war. Among the above five factors,
It was all kinds of reasons that led to the First World War.