Nicholas’s theory is not only wrong, but also harmful. At that time, Hitler advocated Nietzsche's theory, but the result turned from prosperity to decline, and he became a sinner through the ages. Nietzsche's theory belonged to power politics. In order to achieve his goal of rule, he used all means and trampled on the bottom line of human morality. Therefore, people who think like Nietzsche should be wary, because When the time comes, they will conquer the crowd with violence. Morality has never won over reality! People who can survive in this system exist in a form that adapts to this system. If the system is evil, evil people will live freely; if the system is good, good people will live nourished. Only the legal system can achieve fairness. If the law can treat people of different classes differently, then it will be difficult for the system not to be evil! Using this kind of legal system and illusory morality to restrain people's selfish desires will only be a battle that can never be won.

Morality has different standards for different groups of people; different concepts have different standards; different eras and social forms have different standards. But just like laws, different moral standards also contain certainties, that is, they are based on their own political and economic interests, and they only represent the interests of a few or the majority. For example, the large conglomerates in the United States that control its political and economic foundation must have legislation and moral standards based on safeguarding their fundamental interests! I think this is just the values ??produced by the value orientation in the ideology of an era, which determines the understanding of issues from different standpoints. Therefore, it cannot be denied that the consciousness of Datong will also appear in the era of Datong. What Nietzsche said makes sense only relative to class. It is a matter of consciousness that believes that social development will reduce class differences. Because this is a source of unrest.

Higher people pursue law, while lower class people pursue morality. Everyone has different moral standards. Also, because everyone has different experiences and different perceptions of right and wrong, it is impossible to require everyone to be the same. Look at the saints, and only sound laws are things that the people of a country or the world can unanimously enact after revisions over the ages. Laws are what the people should pursue, not morality. You can look at the country of gentlemen. . Nietzsche was right. Morality is a constraint for low-level people. High-level talents do not talk about morality and their actions are not restricted by morality. Their success has nothing to do with morality. People just say he is moral or immoral according to need. For thinking, there are only pioneering and conservative ones, not moral and immoral ones.

First of all, we must confirm that humans are social animals, and they are divided into higher and lower classes, in other words, nobles and commoners. Morality is the minimum bottom line. Nobles do not need to be reminded of the bottom line, so there is no need to use morality to remind them. Civilians have no bottom line, and they must be warned by the red line of morality. Some people say that rich people are high-class people, which is completely wrong. There are also low-class people in the aristocracy. People who do not need to use moral bottom lines to judge are superior people. Those who understand will understand naturally, but those who don’t understand don’t need to be taught. Morality, except human ethics, and law all protect the weak. The strong can obtain more resources on their own, but the weak must unite to restrict the strong and strive for more opportunities for survival and development. Therefore, some benevolent strong and weak people who were inspired by the weak formulated social orders such as morality and law. Of course, only in this way can human beings have today's civilization!