Both chariots and horses 1. Pei Gong’s participation in riding Fan Kuai.
2. Looking down at the path, he climbed up to Shi and looked at it, saying: "That's OK."
3. The merchants of Zheng led the market to the Zhou Dynasty at Xiangao. When they encountered it, they took advantage of it. Wei Xian and Niu Twelve rewarded the master.
The article adopts the method of citation and quotes eighteen ancient books. From the "Book of Songs", "The Analects of Confucius" and "Zuo Zhuan" in the pre-Qin Dynasty to the works of Wang Bo in the Tang Dynasty, the time span is two thousand years. When quoting, some only quote without explanation; some quote with a brief explanation; some quote with a detailed explanation. Quotation includes two forms: 1. Direct quotation, that is, directly quoting the narrative in ancient books as confirmation. For example, to give an example of "carriage and horse riding together", it quoted "The Book of Songs·Tang Feng·Shan You Shu" "Chi Fu Chu" and "The Analects of Confucius: Gongye Chang" "May the chariot and horse wear light fur, and be with friends without shaking" fully confirm that "chariot and horse" are indeed "simultaneous".
2. Quotes combined with explanations. When quoting classics, the necessary explanations are given for fear of being unclear and causing misunderstanding. For example, it is explained that "driving four horses is a four-horse horse" and quoting "The Analects of Confucius: Ji Shi" "Qi Jinggong has a thousand horses" and then explains that this does not mean that he has four thousand horses, but that he has a thousand chariots. In this way, readers can understand the meaning of "Si" from the characteristics of "both chariots and horses".
There are ten quotations in this article that are not explained. Among them, "The Book of Songs·Tang Feng·Shan Youshu" and "The Analects of Confucius·Gongye Chang" prove that ancient books often use both chariots and horses. "Zuo Zhuan: The Eleventh Year of Yin Gong" states that "Gongsun Yan and Uncle Yingkao fought for the chariot, and Uncle Yingkao took it away", which means that if you take away this military chariot (car), you cannot drive it, which proves that it was used for a small car. "The Analects of Confucius·Wei Linggong" "In public service, one can see him serving in the public service", and "in public service" means riding in a small car. The other six places are "Laozi", "Huainanzi", "The Analects of Confucius: Wei Zheng", "Zuo Zhuan, the Second Year of Xuangong", "Chu Ci·Guo Shang" and "Tengwang Pavilion Preface". The original meaning of these examples is the meaning to be explained, so No need to explain. A sentence is meant to prove a point, so there is no need to explain it.
An example of a detailed explanation is "The Book of Songs·Beifeng·Gao has bitter leaves". Because rail has ambiguity, the former one is equivalent to the meaning of 莻, which is not known to people, so it is not suitable for "Ji Ying Bu Ji". The sentence "rail" needs to be explained in detail. The latter one is equivalent to the meaning of rut, but what does it have to do with the structure of chariots and horses? Therefore, it is explained in detail by citing "get off the car today and share the same track". Citing the story of "Zuo Zhuan: The Twenty-Fiveth Year of Duke Zhao", two viewpoints are put forward: Kong Yingda believes that in the late Spring and Autumn Period (the twenty-fifth year of Duke Zhao of Lu is 514 BC and 38 BC of the Warring States Period), there is still no one riding alone; Liu Xuan believes that this It was the beginning of solo riding, that is, the start of solo riding no earlier than the late Spring and Autumn Period. Su Qin's words were addressed to Zhao Suhou, who had just taken power. Zhao Suhou reigned from 349 to 326 BC. "Thousands of chariots ride, ten thousand horses ride", the number of horses far exceeds the number of chariots, so there were indeed single riders in the middle of the Warring States Period. In order to explain the situation, I will explain it in detail.
If it can be understood through explanation, examples will not be given. For example, what are the axis, , , axis, etc. Once explained, there are no examples. There are three situations where examples are necessary: ??1. Without examples, they are not enough to convince people. For example, "It is common in ancient books to use both chariots and horses", so we must give examples, and one example is not enough. 2. A word has two meanings, which cannot be explained without giving examples, such as rail. If a thing has two names, such as Yuan and , and , examples should also be given. 3. Examples can better enhance the effect of explanation, such as a sentence from "Huainanzi" to illustrate the importance of jurisdiction.
Generally speaking, the examples in the article, whether citing ancient books or allusions, in detail or in detail, are effective in explaining the basic characteristics of things, and irrefutably prove their conclusiveness. nature, which quite clearly shows the scientific nature of the article's explanation of things.