First of all, we should further raise awareness. Criticism and self-criticism were put forward by Comrade Mao Zedong on the basis of summing up the historical experience of our party. They are the basic methods to solve contradictions within the party and the important means for producers to transform the subjective world. Comrade Mao Zedong once pointed out: "With the weapons of Marxism-Leninism, criticism and self-criticism, we can get rid of bad work style and maintain good work style." Many of us in party member can become excellent leading cadres, both in wartime and in the period of peace building, thanks to the ideological weapon of criticism and self-criticism. Comrade Chen Yun said: "As long as we are brave enough to carry out criticism and self-criticism, adhere to the truth and correct mistakes, our * * * production party will be invincible in the world." Comrade Xu Teli said: "Only by accepting criticism can we get rid of all the spiritual dross. Only by absorbing the opinions of others can we add new spiritual nourishment. " These famous sayings are all things that we should keep in mind. Secondly, we must adhere to the principle of party spirit and eliminate selfish distractions. Comrade Deng Xiaoping once pointed out: "We have to criticize all kinds of wrong tendencies seriously." Party member's thoughts and actions should be consistent with the Party's line and principles at all times, which is determined by party member's party spirit. Only by adhering to the principle of party spirit and fighting against unhealthy trends selflessly and fearlessly can government decrees be unblocked and the cause be successful. Therefore, when considering a problem, every party member should proceed from the overall situation and the interests of the Party, so as not to lose the true colors of the vanguard of the working class. As long as each of us in party member gets rid of distractions and strives to enhance party spirit, we will certainly be able to enhance the courage of criticism. Third, we should learn to absorb political nutrition from criticism. For party member, criticism, like air, moisture and sunshine, is the key to life and the magic weapon to keep political youth forever. A person will inevitably have shortcomings, mistakes and mistakes in his work because of the inconsistency between subjective and objective, and his self-cognitive ability is limited. No matter how strict his self-dissection is, it is not easy to fully see his own shortcomings and deficiencies. The ancients said: "It is easy to know people, but difficult to know friends." Only when leading cadres in party member sincerely accept criticism from others and actively absorb nutrition from other people's criticism can they make continuous progress. Fourth, dissect yourself strictly. If listening to others' criticism is the external motive force of our progress, then self-criticism is the internal motive force. With this driving force, we have the ability of self-purification and self-care and can make continuous progress. As the saying goes, a doctor who can treat himself is a really good doctor. If there is no spirit of self-criticism, if you can't dissect yourself strictly, you will have psychological rejection of criticism, even if others' criticism is correct, profound and comprehensive, it is hard to accept. External factors need to play a role through internal factors. Criticism of others needs self-criticism to digest. Comrade Chen Yun put it well: "Self-criticism is a valuable weapon for party member to learn, and accepting the party's criticism with an open mind is a necessary condition for party member's progress. Good * * * produces party member, and every criticism of the party should be accepted and understood with a sincere attitude and a pleasant attitude, and your mistakes should be corrected. " It goes without saying that criticism has become a faithful companion of life and an important part of our life. In recent years, criticism and self-criticism have almost disappeared. As one of the party's three fine styles, this weapon is used too little. "Goodwill" (actually synonymous with liberalism) prevails, and there is a sense of harmony in the organs. Nobody will offend anyone. Superior to subordinate, coaxed to protect; The lower level to the higher level, holding and carrying; Between peers, wrap it up. Because criticizing superiors for fear of retaliation will affect their career development and lose their jobs; Criticizing peers is afraid of affecting the relationship and hurting harmony, which makes people say "mom", but it is even worse to be labeled jealous; Criticize subordinates for fear of losing votes and mass base. Self-criticism is even more difficult, for fear of affecting prestige and losing face, and fear of "getting burned"; To make matters worse, how can a person who knows his mistakes clearly but doesn't admit or accept them talk about self-criticism? Better, criticize dragonflies, avoid reality, avoid weight, and talk about hope; Self-criticism is superficial, while public criticism is implicit praise. Objectively speaking, the above phenomena are not individual phenomena, but have certain universality. Every party member knows the importance of criticism and self-criticism to Party building, but why can't it be carried out? I think the reasons are various and complicated. Telling the truth is human nature, and no one wants to tell lies (as evidenced by many harsh criticisms in private). The key lies in the lack of a good environment for telling the truth, carrying out criticism and self-criticism. At work, it is not uncommon to get revenge for criticizing leaders, and there are few good results. It is a "rational" choice for people to seek advantages and avoid disadvantages. Except those who seriously hurt their own interests dare to criticize, most people choose silence and response. Even if the leader is not a person who takes revenge, he really wants to listen to everyone's opinions. Most people will not be "naive" and say whatever they have. Who knows if it is a "set"? The crux lies in the crisis of trust between people and the imperfect inner-party democratic system, which can not effectively protect critics. So I think it is necessary to create a good environment that dares to criticize and self-criticize. There are two keys. First, leaders set an example and become an example of criticism and self-criticism. Dare to manage strictly, not afraid of offending people, not afraid of losing tickets, and put the party's cause first; Be open and honest in the team, meet each other honestly, be open and aboveboard, put any opinions and criticisms on the table, and don't engage in intrigue, duplicity and duplicity; Be strict with dissecting yourself, not afraid of "flesh aches", be strict with self-discipline and put pressure on yourself; There is a measure of all rivers running into the sea, and there is an open mind, and critics are regarded as friends and self-aware. Even if there are differences in criticism, they can be corrected and encouraged without differences. The second is to further expand inner-party democracy and improve and perfect the inner-party democratic system. For example, the democratic life meeting system, the party branch's heart-to-heart talk system with party member, and the provisions for protecting comrades with different opinions within the party have ensured the healthy development of criticism and self-criticism from the system. It is dangerous not to criticize Dong Aiping. At present, it is a common phenomenon that criticism and self-criticism cannot be carried out within the party. There are two main reasons. On the one hand, some party member's ideals, beliefs, world outlook, outlook on life and values are distorted, emphasizing economy over politics; Pay attention to material interests and ignore spiritual pursuit; Pay attention to individual enterprising, abandon collectivism and form a kind of "political indifference". On the other hand, some leaders have a "centralized" and "paternalistic" style, and party organizations lack the relaxed conditions to carry out inner-party criticism. It is quite dangerous for our ruling party not to carry out criticism and self-criticism well within the party. The former Soviet Union and Eastern Europe are not far away. We should take this as a warning, seriously educate all party member, especially leading cadres, correct our understanding of inner-party criticism, and enhance our sense of party spirit and high sense of responsibility. Create the ideological basis, political environment, humanistic conditions and organizational measures to carry out criticism and self-criticism, and make full use of criticism and self-criticism as the weapon of Marxism-Leninism, so that the Party will always become the vanguard of the proletariat and the strong leadership core of the socialist cause. It goes without saying that the history of Beijing Institute of Organization and Personnel has almost disappeared in recent years. As one of the Party's three fine styles of work, this weapon is used too little, "Goodwill" (actually synonymous with liberalism) prevails, and there is a harmonious atmosphere in the office. Nobody will offend anyone. Superior to subordinate, coaxed to protect; The lower level to the higher level, holding and carrying; Between peers, they are all wrapped up. Because criticizing superiors for fear of retaliation will affect their career development and lose their jobs; Criticizing peers is afraid of affecting the relationship and hurting harmony, which makes people say "mom", but it is even worse to be labeled jealous; Criticize subordinates for fear of losing votes and mass base. Self-criticism is even more difficult, for fear of affecting prestige and losing face, and fear of "getting burned"; To make matters worse, how can a person who knows his mistakes clearly but doesn't admit or accept them talk about self-criticism? Better, criticize dragonflies, avoid reality, avoid weight, and talk about hope; Self-criticism is superficial, while public criticism is implicit praise. Objectively speaking, the above phenomena are not individual phenomena, but have certain universality. Every party member knows the importance of criticism and self-criticism to Party building, but why can't it be carried out? I think the reasons are various and complicated. Telling the truth is human nature, and no one wants to tell lies (as evidenced by many harsh criticisms in private). The key lies in the lack of a good environment for telling the truth, carrying out criticism and self-criticism. At work, it is not uncommon to get revenge for criticizing leaders, and there are few good results. It is a "rational" choice for people to seek advantages and avoid disadvantages. Except those who seriously hurt their own interests dare to criticize, most people choose silence and response. Even if the leader is not a person who takes revenge, he really wants to listen to everyone's opinions. Most people will not be "naive" and say whatever they have. Who knows if it is a "set"? The crux lies in the crisis of trust between people and the imperfect inner-party democratic system, which can not effectively protect critics. So I think it is necessary to create a good environment that dares to criticize and self-criticize. There are two keys. First, leaders set an example and become an example of criticism and self-criticism. Dare to manage strictly, not afraid of offending people, not afraid of losing tickets, and put the party's cause first; Be open and honest in the team, meet each other honestly, be open and aboveboard, put any opinions and criticisms on the table, and don't engage in intrigue, duplicity and duplicity; Be strict with dissecting yourself, not afraid of "flesh aches", be strict with self-discipline and put pressure on yourself; There is a measure of all rivers running into the sea, and there is an open mind, and critics are regarded as friends and self-aware. Even if there are differences in criticism, they can be corrected and encouraged without differences. The second is to further expand inner-party democracy and improve and perfect the inner-party democratic system. For example, the democratic life meeting system, the party branch's heart-to-heart talk system with party member, and the provisions for protecting comrades with different opinions within the party have ensured the healthy development of criticism and self-criticism from the system. From Mu case and Ma case, we can see the importance of criticism. Mu, the former mayor of Shenyang, who was sentenced to death with a two-year suspension of execution, and the former executive deputy mayor who was sent to the guillotine had many reasons for their corruption, but their arrogance and refusal to criticize and self-criticize were one of the internal causes of their crimes. I live frugally when I am eager to be a worker. In order to save a few cents a month, my wife cuts my hair. You can discuss with your wife and accept other people's opinions in your work and life. When I became the mayor of Shenyang, not only did my life style derail, but my car, house and even my wife changed beyond the standard. The leadership style is also arrogant and arrogant, putting individuals above party organizations. The Standing Committee of the Municipal Party Committee often makes excuses not to attend, and will strike the table and call names in case of different opinions. At the meeting of the municipal government, it was even more centralized. Others are not allowed to talk, and whoever they want to scold is often "Fuck you!" Talk about it, and threaten to "withdraw your post" and "stop your official" if you are slightly unhappy. Ma Xiangdong, the executive vice mayor, was proud of not being scolded, and he was deeply proud of it in the interrogation room: "Hum, I admire anyone who dares to scold me, but my old horse dare not scold me."