Yu Dan, an "academic star" who came down in the dark, basically left the screen and returned to the classroom standard of colleges and universities. Since then, Meng Man, Kang Zhen, Li Bo and other "academic stars" have appeared in the "China Poetry Conference". But soon there was a lot of discussion on the internet. At first, Kang Zhen and other judges' poetry level was poor, and later Li Bo's own "set of sentences" was also poor. Some people defend Kang Zhen, saying that he is a professor, not a poet, and that Congress recites poems instead of writing them, so why demand the poetry level of the judges. I didn't know that famous poetic theorists in past dynasties were all good at poetry. It's hard to avoid being ridiculous to learn poetry without being good at it.
China Poetry Conference will undoubtedly play a positive role in guiding the popularization of poetry. But to the dissatisfaction of netizens, the judges invited by the program group, such as Kang Zhen and Li Bo, are amateurs and can't write poems at all. In the program, Li Bo's "rhetoric" and Kang Zhen's "poetry" both attracted criticism from insiders. To tell the truth, the biggest drawback of classical literature now is that researchers are amateurs in creation, mainly studying poetry culture, and many of them are studying "the study of culture" Both Li Bo and Kang Zhen wrote a poem on the spot. Li Bo collected Su Shi's poems:
"People taste pure joy, according to powder incense. I hate that this body is not mine, and this peace of mind is my hometown. "
Kang Zhen's self-written poems:
"Big river flows the sun and the moon, and the ancient rhyme has a new face for wheatgrass. The rooster sings the world wide, and the generation sings the spring. "
Both of them are totally incompatible works, which is out of proportion to their status as literature professors. From the beginning of meter, quatrains from ancient times to the present, the first sentence is not an ending, but a rhyme. As a judge of the poetry conference, it is a pity that there is no such common sense. This is one of them. Secondly, among the 28 words, there are two "yes", two "I" and two "this" besides the words that must be repeated. Which poet or poet did this? Unless it's intentional. Poetry is an art that emphasizes simplicity. Third, there is a problem with leveling. It is wrong to "hate this body for a long time". The original text is "I hate this body for a long time." My word is Pingsheng, and my word is Xu Sheng. Su Shi's training is right, but Li Bo is wrong. Fourth, the word "Huan" doesn't rhyme. Two rhyming words, one is "Xiang" and the other is "Xiang", have the same pronunciation, have no change and are extremely rigid. Fifth, the four sentences in this poem are irrelevant. Especially the second sentence, the whole poem is completely unintelligible.
In fact, not only scholars such as Kang Zhen, Li Bo and Meng Man, but also many professors have written works. The research objects range from Li Bai Du Fu to Li Shangyin and Li Qingzhao to Yang Shen Nalan Xingde, but they can't write a poem that conforms to the rules. Especially on the CCTV stage, facing countless poetry lovers and audiences, Kang Zhen and Li Bo, as university professors and doctoral supervisors, made many mistakes and misled the audience.
At present, the knowledge structure and knowledge reserve of many college teachers are not ideal, in place and solid. As the president of the Academy of Fine Arts, he only "understands" the theory of fine arts and can't draw, so he is not as good as today's third-rate painters. As a literary tutor, he can't write poetry, novels or even essays, not as good as a Chinese middle school teacher in the Republic of China. These so-called authorities and big coffees knew how to link published papers with degrees and titles as early as in universities and master's degrees, so they "learned from others" and "benefited a lot", but they could not see their insights and touch their hearts.
"When the scissors are cut, the paste is sticky, the signature is long, and the article is long." Many so-called academic papers are concocted in this way, which has spawned a lot of "academic garbage". Look at the papers published in the so-called core journals today. Sometimes quotations, notes and references are even longer than the text, which makes people feel "academic" and "silent". Commentator Meng Fanhua said:
There are serious problems in current academic criticism, and the rigidity of critical style greatly reduces the effectiveness of literary criticism.
Meng Fanhua's academic school is mostly teachers engaged in literature teaching and theoretical criticism in colleges and universities. I have also come into contact with some teachers from the College of Liberal Arts in universities. They talk about other people's novels, essays, poems and plays, which can be said to be drooling and articulate, but if you let them write a literary work, even a few lines of poetry and a mini-novel, they will be at their wit's end immediately! Look at those intellectuals who have been teachers, Lu Xun, Hu Shi, Ye Shengtao and Shen Congwen. Even ordinary primary and secondary school teachers will splash ink and write various works. This is by no means today's accumulation, and this is the fact.
193 1 Mei Yiqi, who became the president of Tsinghua, has always advocated that universities "should have two purposes, one is to study academics, and the other is to cultivate talents". Mei Yiqi has two famous sayings in Tsinghua, which have been told by people for many years. There is a saying: "A great scholar is either an architect or a master." Another sentence is: "There are no bad students, and bad students are all bad teachers."
If universities in the past succumbed to political pressure, today's universities are obsessed with the magic of money. Many professors and scholars regard learning as a profit-making capital, rather than the basis for solving doubts through preaching. If "star scholars" and "star scholars" lose their moral constraints, they will inevitably have the opposite effect.
Most professors and scholars who trace back to China's modern literature are proficient in Chinese and Western literature, and their theories and creations are correct. For example, Lu Xun, Hu Shi and Qian Zhongshu have not only profound theoretical research achievements, but also brilliant literary creation achievements. In contrast, contemporary university professors and scholars are often eager for quick success and instant benefit, or even conduct theoretical research just to obtain professional titles.
At the same time, many scholars and professors in universities are generally "one-armed generals" because of their narrow knowledge and narrow professional division of labor. These people often talk about Kan Kan, quote classics and fly in the air, but you ask him or her to write a poem, fill in an empty word, write a novel or an essay, immediately tie his or her hands and feet, and find a gap to drill.
In fact, today's scholars and professors don't necessarily have to be intellectuals like Lu Xun, Hu Shi and Qian Zhongshu, but as a literary leader who teaches ancient poetry, being invited by CCTV to be a judge of classical poetry will always make a poem that is not so excellent but acceptable. You can't just talk on paper, but you are also afraid of "showing the stuffing"? So how can these "academic stars" stand the test of time?