But why is there a kind of helplessness that heroic performance and family can't take care of? Throughout the history of China, there are indeed countless people who have done great things and made great contributions to their cause. They can't be filial and take care of their families. From Dayu's flood control to Qiu Jin's death, history will never be forgotten. Needless to say, countless Chinese sons and daughters gave up their families in order to take care of everyone during the Anti-Japanese War. How many people didn't care about their wives, children and parents in class for the establishment and construction of new China! There are also some black-hearted people. For example, Liu Bang can push a pair of children out of the car to escape, and Wu Zetian can kill her daughter to frame others for her superior position. Over time, it seems that you can really ignore your family and your loved ones for your career, let alone your health.
If it is justifiable to say that in the extreme left era in the past difficult years, it was too much emphasis on collectivism and neglected personal interests, then today, with the great improvement of material conditions and great progress and innovation of ideas, people can no longer be encouraged to sacrifice personal interests, family and affection for national interests, which is unfilial. Margaret Thatcher is very successful in politics and is recognized as a great prime minister in British history, but her son and daughter are full of resentment against her: her mother doesn't care about us for her career! Recently, the Prime Minister of New Zealand resigned to take care of his family. Can we say that Margaret Thatcher's disregard for public interests is worth learning and advocating, and that the Prime Minister of New Zealand should be condemned for abandoning the country for a small family?
You must take responsibility for yourself. This is true for both public and private. Abandoning public interests for private interests, no, abolishing private interests for public interests cannot be advocated unconditionally. Mrs. Thatcher has several identities, prime minister and mother's wife. Her incompetence as a mother is a disastrous blow to her children, which is not conducive to her success in life and the kindness of others. Even if you don't care about your children for work, it is also a cruel injury to others and beneficial to yourself. The Prime Minister of New Zealand can resign according to law. Why did he insist on his post at the expense of his family? Why insist on using the standards of sages to demand everything from everyone? If some industries are destined to "waste private affairs" for the public, such as military police and special industries, they often cannot take care of their families, they should have institutional compensation, and at the same time try to avoid and reduce personal losses. In recent years, I have also read some reports that some advanced figures were injured by illness and overworked for a long time, and finally died at the work site or died young. As individuals, they have their own reasons for doing so, but if they can cure the disease and keep healthy as soon as possible, how much work can they do and how much contribution can they make to the party and the people? Are their colleagues and superiors too cold, cruel and selfish? Has our whole society kidnapped some British model figures with high moral standards and forced them to go further and further on the road of anti-humanity? In the end, they created a perfect model image for the society, and the whole society trampled on the minimum kindness and reason of human beings because of its own sacrifice. I don't want to see such an English model appear again!
A great cause should not interfere with family ties, but should try to give consideration to personal interests.